Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread V

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Far be it for me to defend a current affair, can’t stand them...

They appear to be a credible sopurce of information when it suits you.

BUT I can understand why they wouldn’t want to let a violent lunatic into the building.

How could they have known this until they attempted to stop him getting in to the building? Is this another blind assumption?

To play your game, how do you know that the journalists didn’t contact them prior to running the story for a chance to comment and they declined?

I don't, but logic tells me that's it's kind of pointless for them to then show up at the studios.

Now your turn.
 
Last edited:
It was in the article Zondor shared, and it ended the question of whether or not he’s a neo nazi immediately.

So you weren't aware of the imagery when I first put my questions to you?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Anyone who thinks my discussion this morning is actually about neo-Nazism is completely missing the point.

The people who knew this should be commended for being capable of reasonable levels of critical thinking.

The rest of you still have some work to do. You are Pavlovian responders.
 
So you weren't aware of the imagery when I first put my questions to you?

Nah. There’s so many of these dickheads out there that I’m not wasting my time being across them all. I saw the story. Did a quick Google search, found the pictures of him with Cottrell, saw the lads group, saw that they reached out to the Christchurch shooter and let’s not forget he was calling the security guard a monkey before beating him. Ticks a lot of boxes.

Why are you defending this guy? He’s just some moron trying to make a name for himself
 
Why didn't "A Current Affair" immediately bring him in to the studio, or conduct a live interview with the man, and show the world just how nefarious he is?

Because giving these people a platform and oxygen to spread their bullshit is extremely irresponsible, and is exactly what they are hoping to get.

Don't know why I'm bothering to reply though. The mental gymnastics on display are once again laughable.
 
The story is that he turned up to channel 9 after they ran a story about his group and belted a security guard. Obviously he’s unhinged

You've got your facts a little off there.

He went to Channel 9 yesterday afternoon BEFORE they ran the story. He went there to either try and stop them, or to demand they interview him or some other such nonsense.
 
Anyone who thinks my discussion this morning is actually about neo-Nazism is completely missing the point.

The people who knew this should be commended for being capable of reasonable levels of critical thinking.

The rest of you still have some work to do. You are Pavlovian responders.
Nobody thinks it's a discussion on neo-nazism.
Tom Sewell (known neo nazi, and focal point of discussion) bashed a security guard.
You chose to question his fashy cred;
"The man is not a neo nazi" you said.
He's seen to be a 1488/ fanboy going back years.
You pivot to attacking posters for blindly agreeing with ACA, even though a)they're right and b)it's easily searchable.. ignoring the facts to make yourself sound less wrong about this. Again.

Ffs telling people to give you evidence then attacking them for giving you evidence?

 
Here's anotrher bizarre one that pops up.

What's "cowardly" about confronting a man one on one? It actually takes courage to do that.

I mean, he's possibly an arseh*le, sure, but a coward?
Again its a generalisation, a throw away line and as you stated earlier modus operandis of "tabloid" style TV shows and printed press agencies, They pretty much to drum up faux rage and discussion that boosts circulation or ratings depending on the media, Facebooks algorithms also have been optimised to boost these types of posts for the same reason, to engage input and more input means more traffic and more exposure to advertising.

its hardly anything new and there was even a parody called frontline that ran for 3 or 4 seasons based on the methods used by said tabloids. The main reason i responded to your post ( also you posted a meme with the words "anyone" emblazed along the bottom) was that i was genuinely surprised you saw that as anything out of the established norm.

Personally if i was reporting the story it would have been along the lines of "bloke who had gegative story published against him rocks up to the media outlet and punches out a security guard"

Whether it is implies that he is a member of any group is immaterial as faw as the actual account of events goes in immaterial IMO.

And the discussion on if he is a coward or anything else reminds me of the typical response the tabloids roll out when an old lady gets mugged in her home with references like "careless" and "cruel assailants", I mean really what do they expect from these sort of lowlives? do they reckon they are gonna rock up to said victims house with a freshly baked cake and a bouquet of flowers asking nicely if they could "borrow" her antique jewellery for the afternoon.

anyway my rant over.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

facebook marketplace ad of the day,
Welder is in good condition it runs but i can't get it to arc. Tig torch regs and bag are good to go.

i would have thought that having an arc welder able to stike an arc would be the primary fucntion of its condition? after all a welder that wont weld by definition isnt actually a welder?

but iam sure he will get the full 80 percent of new price he is asking. :rolleyes:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You've got your facts a little off there.

He went to Channel 9 yesterday afternoon BEFORE they ran the story. He went there to either try and stop them, or to demand they interview him or some other such nonsense.

Cheers. I saw the video and thought the news reported that this morning.

That’s even more mental tbh.

Imagine turning up and being like “hey don’t run that story about my group” thinking it’ll matter and then racially abuse and assault a security guard.

He’s just given them more ammunition. Though usually those type of people aren’t at the high end intelligence wise, but I would expect a little bit of street smarts.
 
Cheers. I saw the video and thought the news reported that this morning.

That’s even more mental tbh.

Imagine turning up and being like “hey don’t run that story about my group” thinking it’ll matter and then racially abuse and assault a security guard.

He’s just given them more ammunition. Though usually those type of people aren’t at the high end intelligence wise, but I would expect a little bit of street smarts.
reread the fb conversation at the end of this thread.. he knows what he is doing and he is manipulating others..
he would also know he is a political ideologue, linked to terrorism, attacking a national broadcaster, which takes the charges up a notch from simple assault.

I certainly smell a snitch..
 
reread the fb conversation at the end of this thread.. he knows what he is doing and he is manipulating others..
he would also know he is a political ideologue, linked to terrorism, attacking a national broadcaster, which takes the charges up a notch from simple assault.

I certainly smell a snitch..
You're giving the guy too much credit. These guys are well known to be very open with their beliefs online- its what gets them attention, and builds their numbers.

 
reread the fb conversation at the end of this thread.. he knows what he is doing and he is manipulating others..
he would also know he is a political ideologue, linked to terrorism, attacking a national broadcaster, which takes the charges up a notch from simple assault.

I certainly smell a snitch..

I just watched the whole video on Reddit. Think he’s just a moron tbh. Wish the security guard knew BJJ or something and just humiliated him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom