Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread V

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just in case anyone needed final convincing that the sexual revolution had gone in to reverse and society had reverted back to the 1950's:

 
Bloody woman getting emotional about being murdered.

Did you read the whole thing?

She's actually discussing legislation before the Commons.
Lets do this a different way..
how much of the article was attributed to women’s issues?
theres a whole three sentences, there’s much larger chucks of that article devoted to tommy ****ing Robinson of all people..

Purely by the weigh of the article does she care more about women’s issues or demonising a political opponent?
 
Lets do this a different way..
how much of the article was attributed to women’s issues?
theres a whole three sentences, there’s large chucks of that article devoted to tommy ******* Robinson of all people..

Purely by the weigh of the article does she care more about women’s issues or demonising a political opponent?


You're on to their fake bullshit. :thumbsu:

It is the classical definition of virtue signalling.
 
This is so going to be like the fall of the Soviet Union.. so much smoke and fear pr0n..
they didn’t have a capable blue water navy until recently, even that’s based off old Soviet tech..
they still don’t have a semi conductor industry so everything they do have has to be imported.
Their defensive system is based on deterrent missile systems. Unless they’ve got a tyrant who plans to nuke the world. They’ll fall apart with a billion mouths to feed.
Chinese maritime strategy is heavily tied to the island chain containment strategy outlined by Dulles in 1951. The Chinese Navy (PLAN) currently views strategy within the lens of US Cold War containment strategy, which didn't begin influencing thinking a great deal until the AirSea Battle Strategy in 2009/10.

Taiwan was a source of tension during this period as Beijing’s militarisation of the South China Sea threatened the First Island Chain. The first chain is linked to the broader Island Chain Strategy, a regional security concept created in 1951 by John Foster Dulles, a future Secretary of State, outlining a prospective defence perimeter to contain communist expansion.[1] The strategy contains three chains with the First Island Chain stretching from the Kuril Islands, near northern Japan, to northern Borneo and contains the South China Sea.[2] The second chain extends from Japan to Micronesia and the third is linked to Hawaii’s defence.[3] However, the Island Chain concept carried little actual policy weight in Washington, but later formed the central lens of Chinese security views by the late 1980s.[4] China’s use of the chain strategy, and its escalated geostrategic rivalry with America, has ensured that the island chains become a recurring theme in US defence papers.[5] USN planners now believe that the First Island Chain is the most ideal to halt the PLAN from dominating the western Pacific, thereby increasing the importance of freedom of navigation and nearby Taiwan.[6] Australia was consequently concerned that Beijing’s deployment of military assets near Taiwan in April 2020, and ongoing militarisation of the South China Sea, may destabilise the region to the point of war.[7] Destabilisation worries were only amplified by China’s modernisation and expansion of its long-range PGM and naval capabilities.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Lets do this a different way..
how much of the article was attributed to women’s issues?
theres a whole three sentences, there’s much larger chucks of that article devoted to tommy ******* Robinson of all people..

Purely by the weigh of the article does she care more about women’s issues or demonising a political opponent?

Real pattern emerging with you attacking prominent women who are talking about their fear of being killed/violence against women.

Have that game of soggy Sao with the regulars on this thread who are up for that kind of thing.
 
Real pattern emerging with you attacking prominent women who are talking about their fear of being killed/violence against women.

Have that game of soggy Sao with the regulars on this thread who are up for that kind of thing.
Oh come on...
really are we going down that path..
I’m now sexist for pointing out a rubbish article?
go back to the original post, and they are not just womens issues, they are socialite, these are mothers, sisters and daughters all over the political spectrum that suffer, so don’t turn this into a left wing/right wing argument, it cheapens the issue, you’re better then that.
 
Last edited:
Oh come on...
really are we going down that path..
I’m now sexist for pointing out a rubbish article?
go back to the original post, and they are not just womens issues, they are socialite, these are mothers, sisters and daughters all over the political spectrum that suffer, so don’t turn this into a left wing/right wing argument, you’re better then that.

You're inventing a lot of stuff here.

You're the one that became enraged by the article.

As I said, play this game with the usual suspects.

I cbf doing the whole AOC thing again.
 


Some big Candace fans around here iirc.
 
I don't even get people that use dating apps. Have social skills really regressed that far?

Slight sweeping generalisation?

Met my wife through work, but one of my mates who is far more socialable than me met his wife through an app.

Sure there a pitfalls, but you aren't getting the best opportunities to meet someone at the pub on a regular basis.

Not everyone has the ability to meet someone through work or regular social means.

Even on a platonic level, it's the same reason I wouldn't have a crack at people who post heavily on BF as they may not have friends or the ability to meet people offline.

I'm all for people unplugging and and getting out into the real world as much as possible, but that's a bad take mate.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I’m I going to be labelled sexist if I point out she’s a nasty piece of work?
:p

Who has labelled you sexist?

And she certainly is.
 
Slight sweeping generalisation?

Met my wife through work, but one of my mates who is far more socialable than me met his wife through an app.

Sure there a pitfalls, but you aren't getting the best opportunities to meet someone at the pub on a regular basis.

Not everyone has the ability to meet someone through work or regular social means.

Even on a platonic level, it's the same reason I wouldn't have a crack at people who post heavily on BF as they may not have friends or the ability to meet people offline.

I'm all for people unplugging and and getting out into the real world as much as possible, but that's a bad take mate.

It is 2021, for a lot of people, even before COVID, online is where they did their socialising.

Certainly I couldn't talk footy in person as much as I'd like, so I do it here.

Bagging online dating is real never moved on from the 90s vibes.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

In a physical sense, how does that actually work?
You do you Cardi.. don’t anyone ever let you tell it’s wrong.
megan-thee-stallion-cardi-b-grammy-wap.jpg
 
You do you Cardi.. don’t anyone ever let you tell it’s wrong.
megan-thee-stallion-cardi-b-grammy-wap.jpg

And that’s on period[emoji14]


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom