Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread VI

  • Thread starter Thread starter DesertRoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
On this day in 1980, KISS played at VFL Park as part of their Unmasked tour. My two older sisters were in attendance. I wasn't allowed to go because my parents thought I was too young.

I am still bitter about this.
Saw the David Bowie concert at VFL Park. Plonked myself down on the seat next to my girlfriend, then felt a tap on the shoulder... Was my ex, in the seat immediately behind me. FFS.
 
Siunce you didn't answer the question i'm gonna

One side of the mainstream media did this with Russiagate, which we now know was a lie (it turns out Trump was right to call it "fake news" - it literally was,) and which has resulted in legal action against the people responsible. (Trump may be owned by some Russian, but they are the mobsters who financed and bailed out his businesses in the US and those people have been aligned with Us intelligence services since the 90s. He certainly wasn't working for or put into power by Putin.)

The other side of the MSM has been denying the reality of climate change for decades. And yes the MSM is partisan.

We've never seen society as divided as it is now and much of that is the MSM refusing to recognise Trump was elected in a legitimate election win. its no different to his "stop the steal" bullshit only they did it first.



Facebook's entire business model is built around damaging people in that manner.




Why should Rogan be held to that standard when the MSM doesn't hold itself to that standard? Rogan doesn't claim to be an accurate source of news or gatekeep what is and isn't acceptable discourse. He just talks with a huge bunch of people, many of whom contradict each other.

What inaccurate information has Rogan promoted (i honestly dunno, I've probably listened to less than an hour of his stuff in my life) and how is it worse than the MSM examples I cited from the US?
Sorry mate, I went to bed after that last post last night and forgot about it this morning.

But i really don't know what you're getting at here or how it's relevant to the parts you bolded. I never said that media shouldn't be held to account for mistakes they make. You're using a strawman there.

Also, you're making the same mistake that i mentioned before in terms of thinking of the 'MSM' as a monolithic organisation and not one with a diverse range of people, views, opinions, sources etc.

I've already explained why I think the 'he's just saying shit' argument doesn't hold any weight.
 
Sorry mate, I went to bed after that last post last night and forgot about it this morning.

But i really don't know what you're getting at here or how it's relevant to the parts you bolded. I never said that media shouldn't be held to account for mistakes they make. You're using a strawman there.

Also, you're making the same mistake that i mentioned before in terms of thinking of the 'MSM' as a monolithic organisation and not one with a diverse range of people, views, opinions, sources etc.

I've already explained why I think the 'he's just saying sh*t' argument doesn't hold any weight.
No worries.

My point is you're expecting a higher standard from Rogan than the actual standard the majority of large media organisations hold themselves to or are held to, even tho Rogan is providing entertainment not actual news or current affairs. If people are actually relying on him for their worldview its because those other sources are perceived to be full of shit and with good reason.

And unfortunately the MSM is two monolithic POVs at the moment. (In Australia its basically one, News ltd.) There is no real diversity if you're looking at CNN vs Fox and even less if its News vs the ABC especially when News ltd regularly has its editors on the ABC and former employees on the ABC board. The Guardian isn't much better and has a long way to get back any real credibility given what happened with Julian Assange and Wikileaks.

The MSM isn't New Matilda, Crikey, the Saturday Paper or even the Conversation. Its didn't break the stories Jordan Shanks or Micheal West broke. Its mostly opinion and they mostly fit within a very narrow viewpoint.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No worries.

My point is you're expecting a higher standard from Rogan than the actual standard the majority of large media organisations hold themselves to or are held to, even tho Rogan is providing entertainment not actual news or current affairs. If people are actually relying on him for their worldview its because those other sources are perceived to be full of sh*t and with good reason.

And unfortunately the MSM is two monolithic POVs at the moment. (In Australia its basically one, News ltd.) There is no real diversity if you're looking at CNN vs Fox and even less if its News vs the ABC especially when News ltd regularly has its editors on the ABC and former employees on the ABC board. The Guardian isn't much better and has a long way to get back any real credibility given what happened with Julian Assange and Wikileaks.

The MSM isn't New Matilda, Crikey, the Saturday Paper or even the Conversation. Its didn't break the stories Jordan Shanks or Micheal West broke. Its mostly opinion and they mostly fit within a very narrow viewpoint.
I'm really not. News orgs have a responsibility to their audience too and I never said otherwise.
 
If you are taking any sort of advice from Rogan then you deserve everything coming your way.

Lightweight pseudo intellectual who is a deep as a sheet of A4 paper.

He is like all of the other grifters out there, looking out for #1; which is fine if you are aware of that.

Classic click bait maker.
 


Fair point


She's been dog-whistling the populist right for a while now. Her social security positions gave me a little bit of respect for her but I always had a hunch, and I have a very good spidey sense with these things now, that she was lurching rightward for a while.
 
She's been dog-whistling the populist right for a while now. Her social security positions gave me a little bit of respect for her but I always had a hunch, and I have a very good spidey sense with these things now, that she was lurching rightward for a while.
Latham-esque
 
Latham-esque
Latham was always the opportunist. He basically had a meltdown when he lost to Howard, then completely lost it when the ALP dumped him as leader.

Nothing like being scorned to make you seek revenge on your once allies.

She is more Amanda Stoker, align yourself with the fringe and ride on the coat tails of actually talented people who stand for something.
 
Latham was always the opportunist. He basically had a meltdown when he lost to Howard, then completely lost it when the ALP dumped him as leader.

Nothing like being scorned to make you seek revenge on your once allies.

She is more Amanda Stoker, align yourself with the fringe and ride on the coat tails of actually talented people who stand for something.

Latham is a piece of shit. Wait till the stories come out.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

As an impressionable 12yr old KISS ARMY member I just went with the flow and did as the cool kids did..........Prima war activate!

Here it is, just over a minute in:


I seen em a few times but was to young to go the VFL park. My cousin and his best mate went and I was pretty jealous. Still got my copies of dynasty and unmasked in vinyl
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Not a real band, iirc was a project thing some of the suicidal tendencies blokes did with Scott Ian from anthrax. I could be wrong however. Did like the music.
I thought it was just Anthrax guys doing something else.

Its been a long time since the 80s tho.
 
Not a real band, iirc was a project thing some of the suicidal tendencies blokes did with Scott Ian from anthrax. I could be wrong however. Did like the music.
Yep, think that was the case.

Our bass player was an enormous thrash head back in the day and turned me on to Anthrax and all the multiple collaborations and side projects.

Our man serial non poster The Other Dean probably could confirm.
 
I thought it was just Anthrax guys doing something else.

Its been a long time since the 80s tho.
Turns out it was a Scott (not) Ian/Charlie Benate collaboration with Dan Lilker from Nuclear Assault.

Charlie was a seriously awesome drummer too just quietly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top