Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread VI

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Egregious means outstandingly bad. Do you feel the same way for Zuckerberg and the people that control Google?
Of course he doesn't. They control the narrative to favour the chadwiko's of the world. Censorship, adjusting algorithms, and control.
 
Because elon musk is a rogue element. No different to rogan in that he is an individual that can't really be controlled. That upsets people. It wouldn't be an issue if he was in the status quo and was compliant.

Besides some data breaches the majority have been pretty happy with dorsey and zuck because they fell in line for the most part. As evidenced by the censorship during covid and the US presidential campaign. Sure they'll get called in every now any then and asked questions so it looks like politicians are doing something. But all it turns out to be is "unsure, I'll look into that" on repeat and nothing ends up happening. Regular people shrugged off any data and privacy issues and just say "well I've got nothing to hide" and continue to use the platforms.

It'll be a very different story for Elon. I mean he memes...won't somebody please think of the children!!! He has guts though because i don't think he'll be painted as this happy (slightly crazy) tech guy that wants to save the planet with his green cars anymore. All the usual suspects will come out and throw everything they can at him and see what sticks.

Already the MSM has stoked fear into the people and made this out to be this big scary thing. I find it quite humourous to see MSNBC and CNN quoting things that could happen, when they've already been happening for the past few years.

At the end of the day he sees potential and a way to make more money. Which in fairness is a real possibility. The paid subscription service he proposed would generate a lot of revenue. There is a reason why dorsey was ousted before, why he was voted worst CEO on numerous occasions and why the board threatened to remove him again...he has his head in the clouds. He was too busy with square, bitcoin (wanting to spend months in africa educating people), and doing yoga for multiple hours a day to really care about maximising profits. Elon on the other hand...i think he has 5/6 companies now all worth over a billion dollars. The man prints money.

That MSMBC bloke complaining that he could shape the outcome of elections and is bad for democracy was funny. It was like, hey only we’re allowed to do that.
 
At the end of the day he sees potential and a way to make more money. Which in fairness is a real possibility. The paid subscription service he proposed would generate a lot of revenue. There is a reason why dorsey was ousted before, why he was voted worst CEO on numerous occasions and why the board threatened to remove him again...he has his head in the clouds. He was too busy with square, bitcoin (wanting to spend months in africa educating people), and doing yoga for multiple hours a day to really care about maximising profits. Elon on the other hand...i think he has 5/6 companies now all worth over a billion dollars. The man prints money.
That attitude is everything that is wrong with the world.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That attitude is everything that is wrong with the world.
Sure but it's the way the cookie crumbles. For some they want to make hay while the sun is shining. Dorsey is mega rich, you can't blame others for wanting him to move on or take a figurehead position so they can get to work. If he has other interests - move on and do them then.

It's like goldstein coasting in the ruck and our younger players getting pissed off because they want to win things and win it all. Same concept.
 
Egregious means outstandingly bad. Do you feel the same way for Zuckerberg and the people that control Google?

You're still not getting it.

Musk owning Twitter
Zuck owning Meta
Murdoch owning News Ltd/Fox

That's all significantly worse than Bezos owning one newspaper.
 
Sure but it's the way the cookie crumbles. For some they want to make hay while the sun is shining. Dorsey is mega rich, you can't blame others for wanting him to move on or take a figurehead position so they can get to work. If he has other interests - move on and do them then.

It's like goldstein coasting in the ruck and our younger players getting pissed off because they want to win things and win it all. Same concept.
Goldstein isn't coasting in the ruck. He's playing on the forward line.
 
You're still not getting it.

Musk owning Twitter
Zuck owning Meta
Murdoch owning News Ltd/Fox

That's all significantly worse than Bezos owning one newspaper.
True.

Bezos is a piece of human shit for other reasons.
 
What podcast? Tim Pools? I can’t listen to him anymore. Not since his crap about Australia being a dictatorship.
I don't give a shit about pool or his pod. But the one they did on rogan's with her, rogan, pool and dorsey. They got taken to task. Expected a softball but got something very different. It was good because there has been no other time where the ceo of a social platform, goggle or youtube has been asked tough questions like that. Especially from someone that has their finger somewhat on the pulse. Which is very different from the fossils in politics asking Pichai if his iphone tracks him :drunk:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You're still not getting it.

Musk owning Twitter
Zuck owning Meta
Murdoch owning News Ltd/Fox

That's all significantly worse than Bezos owning one newspaper.


The original post that you’re conversing with me about is that I showed that all the richest people in America own the information.

You’re nitpicking for some reason and it doesn’t make sense to me.

Playing down Bezos owning the Washington Post and literally changing the way they report about him. You say you’re not a fan boy but it certainly seems like it.
 
The original post that you’re conversing with me about is that I showed that all the richest people in America own the information.

You’re nitpicking for some reason and it doesn’t make sense to me.

Because I think it's nonsense to include Bezos in the same list of Musk/Zuckerburg/Murdoch when talking about "controlling the media/information".

And again, let me be absolutely clear; I am no Bezos fanboy and I don't think billionaires should exist. Eat the rich.

But on this one specific topic/issue, Bezos is unequivocally not on the same level of Musk/Zuck/Rupert.
 
Because I think it's nonsense to include Bezos in the same list of Musk/Zuckerburg/Murdoch when talking about "controlling the media/information".

And again, let me be absolutely clear; I am no Bezos fanboy and I don't think billionaires should exist. Eat the rich.

But on this one specific topic/issue, Bezos is unequivocally not on the same level of Musk/Zuck/Rupert.


At least they don’t own tiktok. That’s some real evil stuff right. Controlled by the CCP.
 
At least they don’t own tiktok. That’s some real evil stuff right. Controlled by the CCP.
At least TikTok allows very progressive LGBT kind of stuff on its platform.

If it was owned by Rupert Murdoch I'd be less confident.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I haven't watched. Was Johnny in the bed at the time? He strikes me as the sort of bloke who'd be into that sort of thing.
No. He left for the night because she hit him a few times and wouldn't stop trying to pick a fight with him. She left for coachella with friends. He thought he'd better take the opportunity to go get some of his things just in case she destroyed some of his costly or meaningful items. He called one of the staff and they said it'd be better if he didn't come back etc. Etc. He wanted to know why. He was sent of photo of shit all over the side of his bed. She'd left him a nice present before she took off for a few days :drunk:
 
At least TikTok allows very progressive LGBT kind of stuff on its platform.

If it was owned by Rupert Murdoch I'd be less confident.


It’s the most invasive app though. It’s been back engendered and it shares all the users information back to the owners in China.

They don’t allow any of that liberal stuff in China fwiw. They have a very strict algorithm.
 
I haven't watched. Was Johnny in the bed at the time? He strikes me as the sort of bloke who'd be into that sort of thing.


Nah she’s completely mental. She tried to destroy his career and he’s exposed her as a psychopath. Literally cut his finger off by throwing a bottle at him. She lied and said he hit her, when it was her who was hitting him.

She’s got no money but he’s just suing her to clear his name.

The dudes got his own issues but in this case, it’s all her. She’s legit got serious mental health issues.
 
He literally does not. His value is bound up in speculation. He’s a fraud and and has been played:


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Wait the guy has a monopoly over privately owned satellites, just brought one of the most influence pedalling sites in history and hes a fraud?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top