- Mar 24, 2011
- 31,315
- 52,414
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
no WhykickamoocowI cleaned up backing Rogan Josh in the Mackinnon Stakes and Melbourne Cup in 1999. Good horse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
no WhykickamoocowI cleaned up backing Rogan Josh in the Mackinnon Stakes and Melbourne Cup in 1999. Good horse.
You called Val insane despite him not stalking people in their homes.You think it's reasonable for people to be stalked/harrassed at their home?
Really?
Same here!!!I cleaned up backing Rogan Josh in the Mackinnon Stakes and Melbourne Cup in 1999. Good horse.
You called Val insane despite him not stalking people in their homes.
That's what I'm talking about. There is no link between Val and what happened to Hotez.
He bought it on himself by posting about Rogan platforming doctors with opposing views to his, even though Rogan also had him on his podcast as well.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ok then "overly authoratitive, corporate favouring, anti-democratic, dissent hating" leanings.I think people who use the term neo-fascist to describe people like Joe Rogan or our government don't really know what that term means, it is crazy to even think it. Even One Nation isn't neo-fascist and they have barely any support because they are too nationalistic for our country's liking.
No it isn't.Sigh.
I'm gonna quote Val here from what he said in response to me first posting about that awful incident;
"He bought it on himself" is an insane thing to say.
Do you really think we should not take every opportunity we can to separate those people from their money, especially if someone needing charity benefits?Do you really look at this list of people and think "yeah, these are the good guys and we should follow them..."
I mean... really?
View attachment 1716396
See this is exactly the sort of out of the box thinking I was talking about with my last post.I'd make them donate to a pro-vaccine group - and I'd get evidence that the money has actually been received by the charity.
Then I'd turn up to the studio, say "thanks for the money", get up and walk out.
Sigh.
I'm gonna quote Val here from what he said in response to me first posting about that awful incident;
"He bought it on himself" is an insane thing to say.
Calling someone a conspiracy theorist is a great way to not have to risk being wrong about something too. Its a great way to marginalise people who might have a valid complaint.lol absolutely not.
If that were true, we wouldn't have flat-earthers or "vaccines cause autism!" or "jews control the world!" types still prevalent.
Conspiracy theorists aren't worth debating because they aren't coming to the table willing to exchange ideas or knowledge. They believe they're right, and everything else is a lie or a hoax or a conspiracy.
Are you willing to accept that the way Pfizer carried out its vaccine program was questionable and at least unethical in documented instances?lol absolutely not.
If that were true, we wouldn't have flat-earthers or "vaccines cause autism!" or "jews control the world!" types still prevalent.
Conspiracy theorists aren't worth debating because they aren't coming to the table willing to exchange ideas or knowledge. They believe they're right, and everything else is a lie or a hoax or a conspiracy.
Ok then "overly authoratitive, corporate favouring, anti-democratic, dissent hating" leanings.
Happy Sheldon?
The state of our countries is a disgrace given we're sposed to be bastions of freedom and democracy.
So what? if he's good enough he'll still win.The debate offer isn't in good faith.
It's the equivalent of Kane Cornes moderating a debate between David Koch and some random North guy on whether JHF should have asked for a trade. It wouldn't be a genuine debate, that's why a bunch of anti-vaxxers have joined the pile-on.
That isn't what I meant at all tho. I actually agree with that.I agree with you, I just think it is important to be accurate, there is a big difference between a neo-fascist and someone who is right wing. If we blur the line of the labels then it is the boy crying wolf scenario, a bit like misogyny, it has been watered down by mislabelling that it doesn't really mean anything to people in general anymore. It was used as a slur to dehumanise people for silly things and now it has lost the impact it once did.
We shouldn't get sucked into American political shitfighting, a conservative isn't the second coming of Hitler anymore than a liberal is the second coming of Stalin.
Our democracies have been eroded because people aren't fighting for it, the fault isn't only on our governments, it is on the people who elect them.
100% back this up.My experiences with Val are that he almost always discusses in good faith. In fact, I can't remember ever seeing him not discuss in good faith. You might not agree with him, but it's good faith. Just because it's a controversial topic which others jump on, doesn't mean the original discussion wasn't good faith.
I do actually agree with that stuff about Q-Anon but if I actually told you my full position you'd have to call me a conspiracy nut.For anyone who wants to actually know who RFK Jr is, including who is supporting him and encouraging him to run for President, then this is a good article for you.
You can even just read the first few paragraphs if you're busy. It'll tell you enough.
![]()
Why Steve Bannon and Alex Jones love RFK Jr.
Fascists know their path to victory goes through turning more Americans into QAnon-style conspiracy nutswww.salon.com
Snap.Always humourous when people think quoting Alex Jones and gay frogs is a gotcha moment...except it just exposes how misinformed people are.
Atrazine exposure disturbs frogs' sexual development
newsarchive.berkeley.edu
Pesticide atrazine can turn male frogs into females - Berkeley News
The herbicide atrazine, one of the world's most widely used pesticides, screws up the sex lives of adult male frogs, emasculating three-quarters of them and turning one in 10 into females, according to a new study by UC Berkeley's Tyrone Hayes.news.berkeley.edu
Two berkeley references.
Always humourous when people think quoting Alex Jones and gay frogs is a gotcha moment...except it just exposes how misinformed people are.
Atrazine exposure disturbs frogs' sexual development
newsarchive.berkeley.edu
Pesticide atrazine can turn male frogs into females - Berkeley News
The herbicide atrazine, one of the world's most widely used pesticides, screws up the sex lives of adult male frogs, emasculating three-quarters of them and turning one in 10 into females, according to a new study by UC Berkeley's Tyrone Hayes.news.berkeley.edu
Two berkeley references.
Never heard of her.Can’t stand Mehdi Hasan.