Chadwiko
The Captain!
- Sep 25, 2004
- 30,372
- 54,249
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Washington Commanders, Boston Celtics
There's a separate thread for Ukraine/conflict stuff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And this is the root of the problem, too many people think it’s powers suddenly extrapolate into every area when in reality, it’s just another committeeFor example, I honestly don’t know (probably due to my own lack of looking into it) what the indigenous voice referendum will do.
I had an argument with my cousin on the weekend because he didn’t know either but says he’s voting no based on what he’s heard from other people.
I’ll vote yes, but I don’t know what that means.
Is it my ignorance, probably, but there’s a lot of muddy water around it. I don’t think the government has done a good job of telling people exactly what the role is and what changes it will bring.
Sadly most people are in the same boat - don't really care so vote no. I'm a likely yes right now but the whole 'campaign' by the Albo team has been dreadful. Their inability to answer questions on funding, how the voice folk would be chosen, what they can have a say on (everything that affects them which is everything) - if they don't start answering soon it will fail. Will not be surprised if they defer the vote 12 months tbh.For example, I honestly don’t know (probably due to my own lack of looking into it) what the indigenous voice referendum will do.
I had an argument with my cousin on the weekend because he didn’t know either but says he’s voting no based on what he’s heard from other people.
I’ll vote yes, but I don’t know what that means.
Is it my ignorance, probably, but there’s a lot of muddy water around it. I don’t think the government has done a good job of telling people exactly what the role is and what changes it will bring.
Sadly most people are in the same boat - don't really care so vote no. I'm a likely yes right now but the whole 'campaign' by the Albo team has been dreadful. Their inability to answer questions on funding, how the voice folk would be chosen, what they can have a say on (everything that affects them which is everything) - if they don't start answering soon it will fail. Will not be surprised if they defer the vote 12 months tbh.
I suppose there is a mix. There are the racist/redneck Aussies who will vote no regardless of any logic. There are the labor or liberal rusted ons who will vote yes or no on party lines. Then there are the rest who might actually consider the facts. I'm just saying that if team red do not change the way they are answering media questions it is doomed. Linda Burney is out of her depth in terms of trying to 'sell' the whole deal - and I think that is a major reason it is struggling. When asked for facts they have been so slippery. I still think Aldo will panic and push it back 6 or 12 months. As of today I just don't see it getting over the line.Have they thought? The Albo team, or is there simply just more opposition opinions in the mainstream Murdoch media?
Personally, I switch off when I hear Albo talk because he’s fake as a 2 strip adidas track suit, though most politicians are.
Can’t see it being delayed, he will push and it will get rejectedI suppose there is a mix. There are the racist/redneck Aussies who will vote no regardless of any logic. There are the labor or liberal rusted ons who will vote yes or no on party lines. Then there are the rest who might actually consider the facts. I'm just saying that if team red do not change the way they are answering media questions it is doomed. Linda Barney is out of her depth in terms of trying to 'sell' the whole deal - and I think that is a major reason it is struggling. When asked for facts they have been so slippery. I still think Aldo will panic and push it back 6 or 12 months. As of today I just don't see it getting over the line.
I suppose there is a mix. There are the racist/redneck Aussies who will vote no regardless of any logic. There are the labor or liberal rusted ons who will vote yes or no on party lines. Then there are the rest who might actually consider the facts. I'm just saying that if team red do not change the way they are answering media questions it is doomed. Linda Barney is out of her depth in terms of trying to 'sell' the whole deal - and I think that is a major reason it is struggling. When asked for facts they have been so slippery. I still think Aldo will panic and push it back 6 or 12 months. As of today I just don't see it getting over the line.
I suppose there is a mix. There are the racist/redneck Aussies who will vote no regardless of any logic. There are the labor or liberal rusted ons who will vote yes or no on party lines. Then there are the rest who might actually consider the facts. I'm just saying that if team red do not change the way they are answering media questions it is doomed. Linda Barney is out of her depth in terms of trying to 'sell' the whole deal - and I think that is a major reason it is struggling. When asked for facts they have been so slippery. I still think Aldo will panic and push it back 6 or 12 months. As of today I just don't see it getting over the line.
I hope you didn’t drop the opportunity for:So my 3 year old just locked himself in his room and broke the shitty doorknob in the process.
I spent the next hour experimenting with various different way of destroying the doorknob, all the while trying to calm him down.
By the time he was out, it felt like I was part hostage negotiator, part champion woodchopper.
There is no functional policy beyond a performance of repelling invaders and the manufacture of suspicion that Starmer would welcome them ashore. This technique is not restricted to the Home Office. Conservative environmental policy has been stripped down to the idea that Labour is the puppet of eco-fanatics, determined to price hardworking drivers off the road. Tory economic policy is a game of running public services into the ground and waiting for Starmer to commit to investment so he can be accused of planning tax rises.
There's a separate thread for Ukraine/conflict stuff.
That's not the same as unprovoked, mate.
i.e. it can still be labelled an unprovoked invasion (which I tend to agree with) even if they invaded in a 'careful' manner to avoid civilian casualties. Though even the latter didn't last long if you look at actual civilian casualties.
Sadly most people are in the same boat - don't really care so vote no. I'm a likely yes right now but the whole 'campaign' by the Albo team has been dreadful. Their inability to answer questions on funding, how the voice folk would be chosen, what they can have a say on (everything that affects them which is everything) - if they don't start answering soon it will fail. Will not be surprised if they defer the vote 12 months tbh.
Have you done that, especially in comparison with Iraq?
It's a relatively low number, but that shouldn't be acceptable just because it isn't of the magnitude arising from the disgraceful US invasion of Iraq.
I think your phraseology of arose organically before is so good.
Iraq was entirely unprovoked, and the US went a long way (physically and intellectually) there.
That the numbers in Ukraine are so low and that Russia STILL hasn't undertaken the kind of attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure that woukd be BAU in a US attack demonstrates - perhaps perversely - that it was a provoked invasion.
It is a family feud. The Russians don't want to destroy or occupy Ukraine, they just don't want a neighbour that's an open threat.
There is no such thing as unprovoked family fight or feud, because there's so much history and so much emotion that both/all parties can feel genuinely aggrieved or provoked.
It's interesting how desperately hard the Ukranian nationalists work to "other" the Russians ... orcs etc.
The Anericans didn't need to other the Iraqis, thats why they could so easily justify a brutal and unprovoked war of conquest to themselves.
The real question on Ukraine is why we're choosing sides in a family feud.
Seen him and archie roach the last time he came back in 2016, was a ripping and very memorable show let him with Archie rest in piece.View attachment 1769508
![]()
Rodriguez, subject of Searching for Sugar Man documentary, dies at 81
The singer died in Detroit after a short illness, according to his family.www.abc.net.au
One of my great younger day albums and the subject of one of the best award winning music documentaries.
☹
Seen him and archie roach the last time he came back in 2016, was a ripping and very memorable show let him with Archie rest in piece.
Had to cancel his past tour and was quite fragile for a while.
I think the answer is that the straight out invasion breached the boundaries of acceptability. No doubt the rest of the world was aware the ongoing regional animosity, and wouldn't have interfered if it stayed at "skirmishes" level. But the invasion and effective declaration of war was a bridge too far (possibly a poor idiom to use in the circumstances).