Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread VII

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think they don't like that his listeners very often fall down into some bad rabbit holes, sometimes reinforced by guests he has on.

However, I think it's more correlation and less causation, and that he's not deliberately malicious. I reckon most of those people would've been down that path anyway and it's on them to pull themselves out of it.

it’s hilarious to me tbh. He’s in the same podcast category as Theo Von, Andrew Schulz, Tim Dillon, Bill Burr, Chris Destefano, Tom Segura etc.. yet he gets held to a higher standard purely because he has such a massive audience.

It’s like when that n word compilation came out after he said he wanted to vote for Bernie Sanders after he had him on and everyone was outraged, yet Sarah Silverman has a similar thing and it gets zero attention.

I spose if you rise to the top you become a target.
 
Let’s gooo


I’ve seen betting options for who makes that list lol.

However it’s worth pointing out that ‘associate’ and ‘client’ lists are two different things.

We want the client list….the other one is suggested to have mainly victims on it.
 
I’ve seen betting options for who makes that list lol.

However it’s worth pointing out that ‘associate’ and ‘client’ lists are two different things.

We want the client list….the other one is suggested to have mainly victims on it.


Long as Santa is not checking it twice we should be ok. 🎅
 
Last edited:
I’ve seen betting options for who makes that list lol.

However it’s worth pointing out that ‘associate’ and ‘client’ lists are two different things.

We want the client list….the other one is suggested to have mainly victims on it.

Mossad/CIA probably has the client list and are still using it for blackmail. There’s apparently tapes too. This must be the biggest conspiracy since they knocked JFK
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I’ve seen betting options for who makes that list lol.

However it’s worth pointing out that ‘associate’ and ‘client’ lists are two different things.

We want the client list….the other one is suggested to have mainly victims on it.

There are companies taking bets lol.
 
Old Joe is all about the cult of personality not substance.

He promotes pseudo science and ignorance and gets fat off the profits of doing so.

He’s a campaigner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This might not be the thread for it but so did Pfizer.
 
Mossad/CIA probably has the client list and are still using it for blackmail. There’s apparently tapes too. This must be the biggest conspiracy since they knocked JFK
LOL.

What about all those other ones we don't know about?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What really happened?

No idea. The official line from the governments has shifted a lot from the original narrative about the origin of the virus and the vaccine efficacy though.

People got cancelled for saying it came from a lab, people got cancelled for questioning the effectiveness of masks, people got cancelled for questioning how well the vaccine worked. Now we pretty much except that it came from a lab, most masks don’t do shit, and the vaccine doesn’t stop anyone from catching the virus, spreading the virus or getting sick from the virus.
 
No idea. The official line from the governments has shifted a lot from the original narrative about the origin of the virus and the vaccine efficacy though.

People got cancelled for saying it came from a lab, people got cancelled for questioning the effectiveness of masks, people got cancelled for questioning how well the vaccine worked. Now we pretty much except that it came from a lab, most masks don’t do s**t, and the vaccine doesn’t stop anyone from catching the virus, spreading the virus or getting sick from the virus.

No, pharmaceutical companies have an excellent record of having the best intentions.

Geez mate, you're sounding more and more like a cooker by the day.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Geez mate, you're sounding more and more like a cooker by the day.

Nah im not. Im just skeptical. Do you think the government has been completely honest with us?

For the record I don’t think the governments were acting nefariously, I think they were genuinely worried about a catastrophe and weren’t prepared.

As for my comment regarding the pharmaceutical companies, their records speak for themselves.
 
I truly don't believe this.

Specifically, I disagree with 'scam', 's**t product' and 'pseudoscience'. There's just no evidence of it.
There is plenty of evidence. Don't you remember what happened?

Why were declining levels of anti bodies after six months used as the basis for providing people with boosters regardless of he health of their immune system?

That was pseudoscience. Ie not real science.
 
Nah im not. Im just skeptical. Do you think the government has been completely honest with us?

For the record I don’t think the governments were acting nefariously, I think they were genuinely worried about a catastrophe and weren’t prepared.

As for my comment regarding the pharmaceutical companies, their records speak for themselves.

It is reasonable to be sceptical, indeed good science is developed from a basis of scepticism. But it does require an understanding of the issues, and there is a lot of mass scepticism around this area due to social media influences.

You second sentence above is absolutely reasonable, and a huge step back from "the vaccine doesn’t stop anyone from catching the virus, spreading the virus or getting sick from the virus", which is just completely wrong and bordering on cookerism.

I get that Big Pharma are a popular target these days, because they're such bad guys, amirite? But just think if you or any of your loved ones has ever relied upon medication to improve, even save, their lives. We all know people in this situation. Such medications were developed by the pharmaceutical companies. Sure, there has been some bad corporate behaviours (price gouging, falsifying trials, withholding data, etc.) but such behaviour is essentially at the periphery of the industry (like in many industries), whilst the core of the pharmaceuticals industry is to develop 'drugs' (including medications, vaccinations, etc.) to save and enhance lives. Without them, we'd be back in the dark ages with an average lifespan of about 30 years.
 
Last edited:
There is plenty of evidence. Don't you remember what happened?

Why were declining levels of anti bodies after six months used as the basis for providing people with boosters regardless of he health of their immune system?

That was pseudoscience. Ie not real science.

Mate, I'm surprised by this. You know how vaccinations work. The reason that boosters exist for this and many other illnesses is that they can't pump you full of a one-off dose that would protect you for years because that dose would do more harm than good in the short term.

It was real science applied to a developing and serious situation. Sure, there were missteps and incorrect decisions made along the way due to the high learning curve (given the virus was a novel one, i.e. not previously present in our immune systems), but it certainly wasn't pseudoscience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top