Post BF Upgrade Feedback - Click Here

Remove this Banner Ad

Random Questions Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlanod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sprout said:
I've got both. :thumbsu:

Heppell will keep his average. Kid's a star.
Click to expand...

Thing is, my other defenders are:

Deledio, Goddard, Gibbs, Enright, Broughton, Adcock.

So can't really get both. I'm thinking, is it worth having Heppell as B7, or should I get suckling for him? Will they average that different for the rest of the season?
 
BarcaRulz said:
Thing is, my other defenders are:

Deledio, Goddard, Gibbs, Enright, Broughton, Adcock.

So can't really get both. I'm thinking, is it worth having Heppell as B7, or should I get suckling for him? Will they average that different for the rest of the season?
Click to expand...
6 of one and half a dozen of the other. Considering Suckling is an extra 30K, I wouldn't do it personally.
 
BarcaRulz said:
Thing is, my other defenders are:

Deledio, Goddard, Gibbs, Enright, Broughton, Adcock.

So can't really get both. I'm thinking, is it worth having Heppell as B7, or should I get suckling for him? Will they average that different for the rest of the season?
Click to expand...

If you've got Heppell already, I wouldn't bother trading him out for Suckling.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No. Now it's too late. With Gysberts it's known he gets the bill, but efficiency is crap. Also he always gets tagged out of the game, given his frame I cannot fault him. I wasted a trade to get him in before his initial price rise, and punting on him to become like foley-crotchin like (ie, adequate cover on field AND making moneY), his inconsistency burned me and I resolved to have him benched, and unfortunately upgraded him just before his 111 (making about 80k). With his recent score you get about 30k or more out of him rise but that's about all the upside unless he can keep it up - which has too many outside factors eg Melb overall performance etc, not going to bank on it. At this stage of the game, you have many teams already with full mid-premium, you cannot afford to play gysberts, so it's a bad trade.
 
potchip said:
No. Now it's too late. With Gysberts it's known he gets the bill, but efficiency is crap. Also he always gets tagged out of the game, given his frame I cannot fault him. I wasted a trade to get him in before his initial price rise, and punting on him to become like foley-crotchin like (ie, adequate cover on field AND making moneY), his inconsistency burned me and I resolved to have him benched, and unfortunately upgraded him just before his 111 (making about 80k). With his recent score you get about 30k or more out of him rise but that's about all the upside unless he can keep it up - which has too many outside factors eg Melb overall performance etc, not going to bank on it. At this stage of the game, you have many teams already with full mid-premium, you cannot afford to play gysberts, so it's a bad trade.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I might not take the punt at this stage, but wouldn't be surprised if it came back to bite me.
 
Sprout said:
Thanks. I might not take the punt at this stage, but wouldn't be surprised if it came back to bite me.
Click to expand...
You want my advice? Take the tips on here with a grain of salt, it's your team, do want you want.

Remember, you're trying to get ahead of the pack, not be in line with them.
 
J Squad said:
You want my advice? Take the tips on here with a grain of salt, it's your team, do want you want.

Remember, you're trying to get ahead of the pack, not be in line with them.
Click to expand...
..and also not trying to fall behind the pack. :D Cheers. :thumbsu:
 
never really had this problem before but 3 of my defenders - heppell, lower and hibberd - have the orange circle next to their name and sc says they're 'unlikely to play'

what's the deal with that? surely lower and heppell will get a game.

anyway id just like some clarification before selecting my emergencies/who starts on the field

thanks
 
juddBOOM said:
never really had this problem before but 3 of my defenders - heppell, lower and hibberd - have the orange circle next to their name and sc says they're 'unlikely to play'

what's the deal with that? surely lower and heppell will get a game.

anyway id just like some clarification before selecting my emergencies/who starts on the field

thanks
Click to expand...

All named on extended bench as playing in a Sun game. Wait til after 5pm today and check sides again, then you will have an answer
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yep, it's just an annoying glitch in the system.
Until Fri 5pm, they should be ditching the phrase 'unlikely to play'.
 
Where else can I find SC breakevens? Fanfooty has been down for a while, for me at least.
 
Contemplating running with two forward emergencies this week. Have both Sylvia and Franklin on the field, with Darling and Mzungu warming the pine. The donut Franklin gave me last week still stings.
 
Any way of getting Sylvia into your midfield (if you have a Swan or non-premium M6), then playing Darling in forwards with Mzungu as emergency, and a midfield reserve? It's what I managed to do this week (I have Chappy and Franklin).

If not it's up to you I guess.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

JasRulz63 said:
Any way of getting Sylvia into your midfield (if you have a Swan or non-premium M6), then playing Darling in forwards with Mzungu as emergency, and a midfield reserve? It's what I managed to do this week (I have Chappy and Franklin).

If not it's up to you I guess.
Click to expand...

I didn't think of that. Thank you, problem solved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom