Because clearly all beliefs are rational and logically formed.
You've never encountered jealousy before in your entire life? Seriously? When women are involved, the 'belief' or 'impression' a man may be under has no credibility what so ever. Nothing in anything youve claimed is actually not explainable under an alternative theory. Example..
Rann strikes up a friendship with a waitress of all people - 'A waitress of all people'. Interesting extrapolation Jo. Waitresses are obviously akin to Hookers.
This friendship transforms into numerous phone calls and 100s of text messages. - Yes. A friendship. How many text messages do you send daily, lets not pretend we live in the stone ages.
The Waitress's marriage falls apart - Which could be entirely due to his own personality defects. Rabid jealousy and insecurity for instance.
The husband spends two years trying to get into contact with Rann.-Signs of obsession? Jealousy?
The husband taps Rann with a magazine - A friendly way of putting a form of criminal assault.
Waitress claims affair- Husband is now charged with assault. Woman claims to want reconcilation. What credibility does she have?
Ive ignored the stuff about Ranns admissions etc, because hes a politician. We all know they manage the media in an attempt to control the light in which issues are portrayed/covered. That in itself doesnt constitute evidence of anything.
See, its your rabid and bordering on blind acceptance of everything Phillips has spouted that makes me wonder about your agenda, because i know you're not stupid enough to be unable to fathom the concept that people can act irrationally. Ive dealt with the jealous boyfriends of girls ive been friends with before. If one of them writes me letters, tries to ring me etc accusing me of something, i tend to not communicate back. Even more so if its a jealous ex. Maybe they should take a swing at me for daring to allow their fragile egos to be hurt.
I don't understand?
So you're saying Phillips is jealous of the friendship between Rann and Chantelois but is not jealous of an affair he assumed they were having?
It seems to me that the only difference we have in opinion is that you think the affair was a fabrication made up after the assualt and I think that the affair actually occurred or was a fabrication of Chantelois well before the assault.
Either way I suppose it'll all out in the court case conveniently timed after the election
If you want evidence of the blokes arrogance, just look at his actions. Anyone who thinks they can assault the head of Government within a state, and get away with it clearly has some issues of arrogance.
I would say that it's more an irrational act than an arrogant one. As you've pointed out it was an act out of jealousy and anger.
These two would much more clearly correlate with irrationality than arrogance.
I mean lets face it, if it was arrogance it would have been at least a little bit pre-planned and thought out. Not hitting a bloke with a rolled up magazine he found lying about ...





