Remove this Banner Ad

Random thoughts not worthy of a thread (Part I)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
whoa - my brain is being consumed by some kind of vortex where thoughts that aren't worthy of a thread have their own thread. i need to move to an alternate reality

You should start your own thread before you move.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Jacques Kallis is the best all rounder ever and Majak is friggin huge....can't wait to see him play next year for us
 
Leon Cameron has a 5 year plan for GWS. Was he around at Richmond when Wallace was there? Must have liked the 5 year plan power point presentation.
 
When does Brian Cook get back from Nepal?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

[quote="Moose Malloy, post: 26350154, member: 107055"
As per YOTR's suggestion re: Thompson/Grima/McMahon, we won 8/9 (or 89%) with that combination... the one horrible loss against the Eagles in the EF.

As per Mixed Results' suggestion, we won 8/11 (or 73%) with the Thompson/Grima/Firrito combo.

I realise these are pretty small samples and a lot of other things were going right for us in the games that McMahon played, especially in the run home, but statistically (or otherwise) he's clearly so important. And when our full strength backline plays, we're in pretty good nick. Thompson's year was fantastic, there were a few dark days where he seemed like the only one out there really doing his job.[/quote]


Agreed with the analysis, there were a lot of other things going for us but I think it's relatively safe to say that our best defence combo is Grima, Thompson, Firrito and McMahon. I'm trying to see if there was another combo (other than Petrie/Tarrant/Hansen) that worked well up forward.

Our marking forwards (+ if we played both McIntosh/Goldstein - if both we had a ruck resting forward):
1-Petrie, Tarrant, Edwards, both - loss
2-Petrie, Edwards, both - win
3-Petrie, Edwards, both - win
4-Petrie, Edwards, both - loss (was wet)
5-Petrie, Tarrant, Edwards - win
6-Petrie, Tarrant, Edwards, Pedersen (f or d? kicked a goal so assuming f) - loss
7-Petrie, Edwards, both - loss (Lake BOG)
8-Petrie, Pedersen, Warren - loss
9-Petrie, Edwards, Black - win
10-Petrie, Edwards, Black - loss
11-bye
12-Petrie, Tarrant, Black - win
13-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
14-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
15-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - loss
16-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
17-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
18-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
19-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
20-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
21-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win
22-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - loss
23-Petrie, Tarrant, Hansen - win

So we played both Goldstein and McIntosh 5 times - for wins vs Geelong & GWS and losses to Essendon, Sydney and the Dogs.

McIntosh was played rounds 5 & 6 by himself (6 had Pedo)

Goldstein was played rounds 8 onwards by himself - 3 poor rounds then our great run of form. Those 3 poor rounds had Pedo & Warren, Edwards & Black and Edwards & Black as the others to Petrie.

Round 7-we played Petrie, Edwards, McIntosh, Goldstein, Thompson, L.Delaney, C.Delaney and Firrito...
Round 8-we played Petrie, Warren, Pedersen, Goldstein, Thompson, L.Delaney, C.Delaney, Grima and Firrito
Round 10-we played Petrie, Edwards, Black, Goldstein, Thompson, L.Delaney, C.Delaney, Grima and Firrito

Fair to say when we had a smaller marking target in the team (like Edwards, Warren or Black), combined with our big backline, we struggled. I think Petrie, Tarrant and Hansen work so well because 1 or 2 can make space for the other by running up the ground and being a link from defence to forward.

Our best key position team from 2012 statistics:
B: McMahon, Grima
HB: Firrito, Thompson

HF: ......., Hansen
F: Tarrant, Petrie
Ruck: Goldstein

Place in a few (currently) flankers (Thomas, Harper, Adams, Atley etc) and combination of inside/outside mids (Wells, Swallow, Ziebell, Cunnington etc) and that will be our no.1 team for round 1 2013
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

[quote="Moose Malloy, post: 26350154, member: 107055"
Our best key position team from 2012 statistics:
B: McMahon, Grima
HB: Firrito, Thompson

HF: ......., Hansen
F: Tarrant, Petrie
Ruck: Goldstein

Pretty hard for the opposition to expose the smallish backline when they are worried about Clarke or Shaw playing on Hansen from the goal square or Petrie monstering someone.

If Goldy holds up and the midfeld at least breaks even then Scott has a tactical advantage.
 
True. The difference in class of both South Africa's batsmen and bowlers sticks out like dogs balls.

I can handle not being as good, and I can handle losing.

What I can't handle:

1. Shit decisions by selectors;
2. Shit decisions from administrators;
3. A failure to learn from previous shit decisions.

Cricket is incredibly simple but too often gets ****ed with by idiots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top