Wasting money on your emergencies IMO
Different strategy/structure to most teams, I know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Different strategy/structure to most teams, I know.
youve got 16 starting players the same as mine Although i went for a risky midfield.
Different strategy/structure to most teams, I know.
ty. Of the 6 players we have different, all of yours bar Betts ive had in my team for a long time in the lead up to round 1. Youve obviously got more security on your bench. Will be good to see who this plays outWoah, that's a fair effort. Foward/Back Lines look very very solid
Finally locked in. This team will pwn all others in 2010.
Wow some absolutely cracking teams on here lads. Well done. Actually spent a bit of time on mine this year but not enough by the looks!!
Here's mine:
Not bad. All the usual suspects which are present in many BF dream teams. Im assuming that you think Harbrow will become a keeper this year? I personally think Waters is your most important player this year. Nason and Silvagni will be in and out of the Richmond and Freo sides all year. Waters isnt known for playing 22 straight games a year so with some shaky back bench players you really need Beau to avoid suspension and injury.Goddard, Enright, Kelly, Hodge, Harbrow, Hunt, Waters (nason, silvagni)
Bartel, Pendlebury, Prismall, Trengove, Martin, Barlow (bastinac, shuey)
Sandilands, Hille (warnock, cucker)
Riewoldt, Okeefe, Pavlich, Higgins, Hall, Giansiracusa, Dangerfield (Gumbleton, Hitchcock)
Not that pleased with it but at least I wasnt pleased with my team last year
Players in bold are the most important to perform. Trengove is the most important. Aiming at 14 trades for upgrades.
Yeah i thought the 4 mids were more likely to get a game and be covered than starting a back or forward rookie too.Audacious, I see you have the 4 starting rookies as I do. Obviously more risk but I considered it better to aportion the risk to the mids where I believe the kids have more chance of getting a run than starting a pods/hitchcock/gumby/rockliff on the field. Here's my team:
Yeah i thought the 4 mids were more likely to get a game and be covered than starting a back or forward rookie too.
I see youve got Anthony in your mids. I got stung by Dalziell last year and couldnt bring myself to include Anthony. You have a somewhat unique team. I like 4 bulldogs in your team.
well thats one of the most flexible teams ive seen posted. I dont think C.Cornes was necessary as you already have Goddard D/M, and Cornes looks like he will slow up this year. A (D/F) would have given you more flexibility. Cant wait to see how many zero's teams that make use of this DP rule get.Wow - there are some great teams on here - thought I'd done my homework but...
for what it's worth...
B: BGoddard (D/M), CCornes (D/M), HShaw, NKrakouer, TKennelly, RLadson (D/M), JHunt (MMaguire, BNason)
M: GAblett, BGibbs, JSelwood, LHodge (D/M), JZiebell (F/M), DMartin (JTrengove, MBarlow)
R: ASandilands, MSeaby (RWarnock, MLobbe (F/R))
F: NRiewoldt, MPavlich (F/M), RMurphy, MLecras, KTippett (F/R), CMayne, MHitchcock (SGumbleton, RRoberts)
well thats one of the most flexible teams ive seen posted. I dont think C.Cornes was necessary as you already have Goddard D/M, and Cornes looks like he will slow up this year. A (D/F) would have given you more flexibility. Cant wait to see how many zero's teams that make use of this DP rule get.