He can be a good bloke 99% of the time. That doesn't mean that hitting someone in the face and knocking them out isn't a dog act.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
LOL...LOL...LOL...Grigg
Gotta laugh at Reiwoldts comments... i mean who would take what he has to say seriously... a sook of the highest order. I have little respect for this bloke.What about the flog Reiwoldt's comments:
“I assume he might have been targeted physically by the Carlton players,” Riewoldt told ABC Grandstand.
“It’s extremely out of character. I haven’t seen it, but I can really vouch for Bachar and say that he would never do something like that on purpose."
“I only caught briefly the umpire saying that he’d reported Bachar for striking, so there’s got to be something behind it — whether it’s being held off the play and a reaction or what not."
“I couldn’t speak highly enough of Bachar and I’m sure there’s certainly a story behind it.”
Source : http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/bac...t/news-story/b89cbfb1de2d86d3ba90cbe855ce6dfe
Hope the MRP see it like the rest of us ..4 weeks ..It was a cheap shot behind play.
It's not like he hit him Barry hall style though. You could probably make a movie length montage on players throw arms back into opponents like he did. His was high and caused more damage than intended. Will cop what he deserves, doesn't make him a sniper or a dog. Makes him a player that had a brain fade and caused more damage than intended.He can be a good bloke 99% of the time. That doesn't mean that hitting someone in the face and knocking them out isn't a dog act.
I wasn't meaning early plea I meant coz of his record.
He did the wrong thing throwing his arm back he probably didn't mean to cause the damage he did but he caused it so he will wear it now. Calling him a sniper for it though cheapens the word. He didn't line him up milburn style. He didn't have only eyes to take lamb out like Lloyd on Sewell.
When he said not intentional the way he said it I took as he didn't mean to cause such damage but as he said himself he will cop what he gets.
Didn't say he was a dog. It was a dog act. Can still be a good bloke, e.g. Judd and eye gouging/chicken wings.It's not like he hit him Baryulgil hall style though. You could probably make a movie length montage on players throe arms back into opponents like he did. His was high and caused more damage than intended. Will cop what he deserves, doesn't make him a sniper or a dog. Makes him a player that had a brain fade and caused more damage than intended.
And we ended up with Jones on Costagna a number of times as a result and it didn't work.Backline certainly was too top heavy given our opponents had so few talls. I always thought Jones, Marchbank and Plowman was more than enough talls in back half against an opponent play multiple smalls.
Really was the week to play Weitering forward and for some strange reason they did not. If not Weitering then give Marchbank a run down there for a change up. Probably only time a bit down on Bolts for not doing either.
Anyway, not the end of the world. Charlie Curnow really starting to feel at home out there and Kruezer continues some great form. Cripps starting to find his mojo. Feel for Lamb. Just gets on park for a week or two and injured again. Houli will get 2 I reckon but nothing malicious in it. Just reflex reckless contact sport stuff.
Interesting that the first quarter, which was probably our best and had us in front, had Cripps with negative impact, Murphy, Graham and Smedts in the negative and SOS, Marchy and SPS with little to no impact.
How will he get 2 weeks. He whacked him in the head and he was out cold.
Minimum 3
you're right - games where he breaks the record for 1 metre handballs to disadvantage need to be highlighted - bloke is having a ripper year but he struggled on sunday as did most of them
I don't think any player dodged a clip if it was deserved....graham of course gets extras as current favoured whipping boy.....No doubt we had a lot in that boat on the weekend but just seems Murphy is mentioned a lot of times in isolation.
Just adds to the perception that Murphy is injured. Game-high pressure acts but is struggling with something, limiting his ability to tackle.
Yeh I know it should be minimum 3 weeks but it's chook lotto ..
How the **** did Rance get 4 coaches votes ?
He is at the tribunal now.
It will be 3 plus