- Jun 12, 2008
- AFL Club
- Other Teams
- NY Giants
What's your point exactly?This aged well cookie monster
I would argue that this doesn't enhance our chances of winning. It's picking the safest player -- highest floor, lowest ceiling -- rather than picking players who have a greater ceiling but due to being unproven the lowest floor. If you were picking for increased likelihood of winning you pick...www.bigfooty.com
But, then you follow it up with this
Hawthorn are likely to finish 17th this season with the list I could argue is under performing. He is cooked.The list is rubbish but they remain competitive most weeks. He's proven what he could do with a good list. Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalkwww.bigfooty.com
Yet not a single post in this thread. Nothing you liked about the win?
Do you disagree that Willow hadn't earned selection?
Or do you disagree that selection integrity is a problem at the club?
As for what I liked, well it's already been discussed ad nauseum. Jack was great looked a match winner, Stocker is building well and has genuine aggression, Walsh's talent goes without saying. But I feel we can only discuss individual brilliance because that's what's won the last 2 matches - in fact we were outplayed for the majority of both games. (3/4 quarters lost v adelaide, 2/4 quarters lost v freo - saved by a barnstorming final 10 mins). Coaching and strategy continues to be the biggest problem and is holding us back big time. I make no apologies for voicing my gripes with that