Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
hello Kitty
I don't recall who. But if it was a deliberate set up then it was a great kick and an equally good lead and mark by young Phebe McWilliams. She does look like at leading forward to me.
Phoebe McWilliams is 23think Phoebe is 33 Rabbi - young in my eyes, but for a footballer no spring chicken - she apparently led the Giants goalkicking the past two AFLW seasons, too .. Boyd was the one who passed it to her, very much deliberately
Phoebe McWilliams is 23
think Phoebe is 33 Rabbi - young in my eyes, but for a footballer no spring chicken - she apparently led the Giants goalkicking the past two AFLW seasons, too .. Boyd was the one who passed it to her, very much deliberately
33 and how old is the girl with the tatts at the Pies..near 40?
Probably another example of the shallow talent pool .. as the comp progresses im sure we will mainly see girls in the 20's .. Maybe even ones who have missed the Olympic dream (eg Blitz) swapping to a sport where they can earn a dollar for their effort.
Cecilia McIntosh is the veteran Pie, she actually turns 40 in June!
Winty pointed out late last year that we actually entered the AFLW with the oldest average age in the comp (!!)
Cats over 30 to my memory:
McWilliams
Coventry (injured; ACL)
Trevean (haven't seen her yet)
Hickey
Teague
Clifford
O'Connor
I'm sure there are 2 or 3 others too ...
Speaking of Phoebe, each week Hickey has a little video segment called "Minute with Mel" and Phoebe was last weeks guest - she is so quietly spoken
My guess is it balances out as we draft more ..give a year or two...
I'm pleased that he's finally found his calling.
GEELONG could be without two key players against Brisbane this weekend, with Aasta O'Connor offered a two-week suspension for striking and fellow ruck Maddie Boyd in line for a one-week ban for rough conduct.
O'Connor was charged with striking Carlton's Nicola Stevens in the first quarter of their match on Saturday, with the incident assessed as intentional conduct with medium impact to the head.
If she accepts, O'Connor will miss games against the Lions and Dockers.
Boyd was charged with rough conduct against Blue Jessica Hosking, with the clash deemed careless conduct with medium impact to the head.
Carlton's Sarah Hosking can accept a $400 fine with an early plea for making forceful front-on contact against Cat Jordan Ivey in the first quarter. The incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head.
I didn't see the Boyd one, or the others from other games... But the O'Connor one is on the money.. She was always in trouble for thatThere was a total of 7 charges laid over the weekend, the only players to be offered suspensions happen to be wearing blue & white hoops, while all others were either fines or reprimands
https://womens.afl/news/16816/two-cats-suspended-as-mro-lays-seven-charges
There was a total of 7 charges laid over the weekend, the only players to be offered suspensions happen to be wearing blue & white hoops, while all others were either fines or reprimands
https://womens.afl/news/16816/two-cats-suspended-as-mro-lays-seven-charges
The O'Connor one happened nearly in front of me but because I was watching the ball and the players trying to win possession, I didn't see the incident but I did see the Carlton player hit the ground hard.I didn't see the Boyd one, or the others from other games... But the O'Connor one is on the money.. She was always in trouble for that
I'm glad that Blues girl that collected Ivey didn't get games either, I said at the time it looked worse live but on replay she didn't actually do anything wrong
ffs ...
thought there was very little between the Boyd and Hosking incidents, surely either both cop a week or both get a fine/reprimand.
I thought both should have been given the same penalty - either both get a week, or both get a fine. I can't see how you can determine how hard contact is just by looking at the incident on TV.
Bigger problem is that one was deemed intentional and the other carelessI thought both should have been given the same penalty - either both get a week, or both get a fine. I can't see how you can determine how hard contact is just by looking at the incident on TV.
Bigger problem is that one was deemed intentional and the other careless
Was actually O'Connor's which was deemed intentional, which I have no issue with. Both Boyd and Hosking were classed as careless, but Boyd was described as medium impact and Hosking was classed as low impact.
Oops - I need to read betterWas actually O'Connor's which was deemed intentional, which I have no issue with. Both Boyd and Hosking were classed as careless, but Boyd was described as medium impact and Hosking was classed as low impact.