Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Rd 5 Blues go down by 90 points

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I never really understand how all the AFL ratings work, but how does Cripps get something like a 12.5 for the Port game?
He had 37 touches. I know handballs don't score as well as kicks, but he had 14 kicks, 24 effective disposals, 18 contested, 7 score involvements, 3 marks, 5 tackles, 7 clearances, 3 frees for/0 against and only 3 clangers and 121 DT points.

The player who scored just slightly more than him, Aidyn Johnson:
14 disposals, 11 effective, 8 kicks, 5 contested, 5 score involvements, 2 goals, 5 marks, 1 tackle, 0 clearances, no frees for/against, 1 clanger and 67 DT points.

The guy who scored slightly less than him, Charlie Dixon:
5 disposals, 4 effective, 3 kicks, 3 contested, 2 goals, 3 score involvements, 2 marks, 4 tackles, 0 clearances, 0 clangers, no frees for/against and 47 DT points.

It just doesn't make sense.
Lies, damn lies & statistics.
 
OMG we're up to page 32 of painful comments. Just couldn't bring myself to read your pain over the weekend.
Can't say I'm surprised about our blue boys.
I still reckon we needed players like Kerridge that can throw in their bigger bodies and run all day.
I look at the low possession numbers os so many of our players. You can't tell me that Kerridge collecting 25 disposals and kicking quickly to a contest is not better than someone getting 10 accurate possessions and with hardly no tackles.
Alot of our players look small in comparison. There is definetely a balance required. Get the games into the young players, but don't have them totally demoralised and indoctrinated as losers.
Was really happy with I saw in Charlie & Casboult. The players look spent.
cheers from Joe

Would have made sfa difference. At least a kid got a game in place of him.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Rd 5 Blues go down by 90 points

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top