Banter RDT 173 - Stupid Americans think wrestling is real

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do yourselves a favour and check The Chaser's twitter account. They ain't pullin' no punches. Exhibit A:

Notice to all Chaser staff about coverage of the Queen's death


Dear Staff,

Her Royal Highness Her Majesty The Queen has just passed away, so it's vitally important that this newsroom remain RESPECTFUL when talking about royals in the coming days.

Remember Charles is the new monarch so it’s VITALLY IMPORTANT we don’t mention that time he told Camilla he wanted to be her tampon. Let’s keep that under wraps.

When talking about The Queen’s legacy, don’t focus on the paedophile son that she protected. And it goes without saying that Diana never existed. We don’t want the website to crash (with complaints about puns about her).

Instead perhaps concentrate on all the children she had that were normal and well adjusted (can’t think of any right now, but I’m sure you’ll be able to find some). Edward perhaps? Is he still a thing?

Actually, maybe skip her children and focus on the grandchildren. Yeah - that’s it. Just DON’T MENTION THAT PEGGING INCIDENT BETWEEN WILLIAM AND ROSE HANBURY. Kate’s still upset about that. And try to pretend Harry and Meghan don’t exist.

Thinking about it, maybe don’t focus on her children at all. Talk about The Queen’s love of animals (except for the ones she shot in all those hunting parties, of course). Actually scrap that. Talk about her love of breeding horses. She loved breeding horses apparently (and no, John, I’m not referring to Anne).

Most importantly of all, don’t mention that she leaves at a time when Britain is literally falling to pieces and thousands of old people will freeze to death this winter, even while the private companies providing that heat reap hundreds of billions in extra profits.

It would be completely unseemly and impolite at a time like this to mention that The Queen presided over a system so unequal that while homeless wandered the streets outside her ******* palace dying of exposure, she owned numerous castles (not to mention half of Sussex) and she still took hundreds of millions of pounds from the public purse to “cover her expenses”.

Monarchs aren’t supposed to be held responsible for the system they sit on top of. Especially not today. Instead, if you need to mention any of that, blame welfare cheats.

Hope this helps. Good luck today. Let’s milk that nostalgia for a Britain that doesn't exist anymore for as much as it’s worth! Fingers crossed this will do even better numbers than Diana’s funeral!

Yours in respectful mourning,

Charles Firth
Publisher
The Chaser
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do yourselves a favour and check The Chaser's twitter account. They ain't pullin' no punches. Exhibit A:

Notice to all Chaser staff about coverage of the Queen's death


Dear Staff,

Her Royal Highness Her Majesty The Queen has just passed away, so it's vitally important that this newsroom remain RESPECTFUL when talking about royals in the coming days.

Remember Charles is the new monarch so it’s VITALLY IMPORTANT we don’t mention that time he told Camilla he wanted to be her tampon. Let’s keep that under wraps.

When talking about The Queen’s legacy, don’t focus on the paedophile son that she protected. And it goes without saying that Diana never existed. We don’t want the website to crash (with complaints about puns about her).

Instead perhaps concentrate on all the children she had that were normal and well adjusted (can’t think of any right now, but I’m sure you’ll be able to find some). Edward perhaps? Is he still a thing?

Actually, maybe skip her children and focus on the grandchildren. Yeah - that’s it. Just DON’T MENTION THAT PEGGING INCIDENT BETWEEN WILLIAM AND ROSE HANBURY. Kate’s still upset about that. And try to pretend Harry and Meghan don’t exist.

Thinking about it, maybe don’t focus on her children at all. Talk about The Queen’s love of animals (except for the ones she shot in all those hunting parties, of course). Actually scrap that. Talk about her love of breeding horses. She loved breeding horses apparently (and no, John, I’m not referring to Anne).

Most importantly of all, don’t mention that she leaves at a time when Britain is literally falling to pieces and thousands of old people will freeze to death this winter, even while the private companies providing that heat reap hundreds of billions in extra profits.

It would be completely unseemly and impolite at a time like this to mention that The Queen presided over a system so unequal that while homeless wandered the streets outside her ******* palace dying of exposure, she owned numerous castles (not to mention half of Sussex) and she still took hundreds of millions of pounds from the public purse to “cover her expenses”.

Monarchs aren’t supposed to be held responsible for the system they sit on top of. Especially not today. Instead, if you need to mention any of that, blame welfare cheats.

Hope this helps. Good luck today. Let’s milk that nostalgia for a Britain that doesn't exist anymore for as much as it’s worth! Fingers crossed this will do even better numbers than Diana’s funeral!

Yours in respectful mourning,

Charles Firth
Publisher
The Chaser

They copped a lot of heat for their Eulogy Song but they are completely right if insensitive.

Same with this one.
 
So is now the time to dump the UK and go it alone?
How much will the changeover cost Aust i wonder, currency and all the other stuff with her head on it.

A bit insensitive for the republic debate to restart until well into Charles' reign - but sooner if he starts bungling it.

The currency is not an issue, obviously the old ones with the Queen on it are still legal tender, all that happens is that when the mint produces new notes and coins as is routine, they will issue them with the King on it instead.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A bit insensitive for the republic debate to restart until well into Charles' reign - but sooner if he starts bungling it.

The currency is not an issue, obviously the old ones with the Queen on it are still legal tender, all that happens is that when the mint produces new notes and coins as is routine, they will issue them with the King on it instead.
Get it done quick I say, who'd want to walk around with a pic of him in their pocket.
Design a new flag without any union jack on it and grow a set!
 

Apparently he’ll be looking the other way on the new currency, because it’s tradition to alternate when there’s a new monarch.

Good thing too, the queen looking east always made me think she was going to ask for a trade.
 
Apparently he’ll be looking the other way on the new currency, because it’s tradition to alternate when there’s a new monarch.

Good thing too, the queen looking east always made me think she was going to ask for a trade.
Would've dumped her quick as and got whatever picks we could while she was still warm!
Although port will probably still take her
 
Apparently he’ll be looking the other way on the new currency, because it’s tradition to alternate when there’s a new monarch.

Good thing too, the queen looking east always made me think she was going to ask for a trade.
What else are you going to do with money? Hold onto it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top