- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
And I would say this has a bit to do with Tex and his new deal. Generally the clubs know before the media so they would know these offers are coming.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's worth about 3 of them to us.If he leaves we better stand our ground Lever is worth more than a 1st round pick.
I can just see it now. They offer us their first, we take it, and then hand it along with our first to Carlton for Gibbs. They would then come out and say how awesome they are for getting the mid we have been missing.If he leaves we better stand our ground Lever is worth more than a 1st round pick.
Stop it, JR might be reading.I can just see it now. They offer us their first, we take it, and then hand it along with our first to Carlton for Gibbs. They would then come out and say how awesome they are for getting the mid we have been missing.
They can throw my membership in with that deal.I can just see it now. They offer us their first, we take it, and then hand it along with our first to Carlton for Gibbs. They would then come out and say how awesome they are for getting the mid we have been missing.
Big, unrealistic offers coming from other clubs mean Jake is very close to resigning with the Crows.
Happens frequently.
It's pretty rare to hear about enormous offers from multiple club mid season for a player that goes on to leave.I want to believe.
Menzel Hampton and Seedsman would all be on decent money to get them to choose us.We're idiots then. Absolutely mind boggling idiocy if we let Lever go for that kind of deal.
Who the hell are we paying all our money to if we can continually lose top end talent and not be able to afford to keep a player as soon as they get a decent offer? We must have a massive middle section where we're over paying a huge group of very average players, but that system doesn't work anymore.
We're idiots then. Absolutely mind boggling idiocy if we let Lever go for that kind of deal.
Who the hell are we paying all our money to if we can continually lose top end talent and not be able to afford to keep a player as soon as they get a decent offer? We must have a massive middle section where we're over paying a huge group of very average players, but that system doesn't work anymore.
525K, though he did have offers of 700K to move, so he obviously wanted to be here. Doesn't sound like Lever is wants to think about doing the same.I'm so sick of losing talent or big players in our team
How much did we give JJ?
Around $550k a year for 5 years. JJ doesn't deserve a 20% on top.I'm so sick of losing talent or big players in our team
How much did we give JJ?
Isn't he at the same age tracking similar to Rance was?
He's clearly a talent that is only going to get better. He is a must keep unless the club is prepared to add to its reputation of losing players.
Boyd taking a pay cut?Chanel 7 reporting bulldogs offering 850 plus per season for 5 years....
Jake Stringer is playing like a player that needs a change, he'd be my starting point.
You and reality are distant acquaintances aren't youJake Stringer is playing like a player that needs a change, he'd be my starting point.
3 way deal Lever to dogs J.McGovern to crows JJ to Eagles.IF Lever was to go (god forbid) what would we an appropriate deal?
Menzel is the only one that would be on decent coin of the 3 newbies IMO and he has clearly been the biggest under achiever when it comes to supporters expectations.......starting to look like a bust if we use his form since he joined us as an indicator.Menzel Hampton and Seedsman would all be on decent money to get them to choose us.
Douglas wouldn't be cheap and he's in decline.
Mackay is Mackay.
Thommos is paid to play SANFL.
The list goes on.