No Opposition Supporters Re-signing Tex, Danger and Sloane *** Crows Only ***

Your thoughts on Dangerfield?


  • Total voters
    684
Status
Not open for further replies.

gothecrows

All Australian
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Posts
703
Likes
840
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Adelaide
I'd put Wingard ahead of Betts. But I have both safely ahead of Cyril.

I'm pretty sure the Player Ratings doesn't reset at the beginning of each year though. It continues using stats from previous years.
That page is listing points gained from games this year only. I really have no idea why their rating system has Rioli so high (sure, he should be relatively high up, but not near Betts/Wingard). It's almost as if their formula is along the lines of:

rating = decode(surname, 'Rioli', 1.5, 1) * rating
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Allefgib

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
21,134
Likes
13,251
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
GO YOU CROW BOYS
Thread starter #36,778
That page is listing points gained from games this year only. I really have no idea why their rating system has Rioli so high (sure, he should be relatively high up, but not near Betts/Wingard). It's almost as if their formula is along the lines of:

rating = decode(surname, 'Rioli', 1.5, 1) * rating
The system measures impact of each action on the field a player is involved with.

Kicking sideways in the back 50 gets you negligible gains.

Winning a contest in f50 and setting up a team for goal, or goaling yourself, gets you tons of points.
 

TexForPM

Premiership Player
Joined
May 21, 2015
Posts
3,562
Likes
3,654
Location
Zegema Beach
AFL Club
Adelaide
The system measures impact of each action on the field a player is involved with.

Kicking sideways in the back 50 gets you negligible gains.

Winning a contest in f50 and setting up a team for goal, or goaling yourself, gets you tons of points.
Cyril has a ridiculously high goal to possession ratio. Meaning when and if he touches it good things happen for hawks
 

dogs105

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jan 12, 2002
Posts
28,621
Likes
33,124
Location
Edinburgh
AFL Club
Adelaide
If you want people to buy and invest in property then don't abolish if you don't want them to then abolish
I don't want them to do it subsidised by the taxpayer.

Out of interest, do you believe that "the deductibility of costs associating with investing in an income-producing asset" should be abolished on all investments, or just housing?
Maybe not business loans - margin loans for shares, yes.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Posts
1,794
Likes
3,153
AFL Club
Adelaide
Why would you possibly think that?

Interesting that multiple studies have shown that left voters tend to be more intelligent than those from the right.
Intelligent or academically qualified ?

Pot smoking hippies on the left want to shut the country down and live off good vibrations in nimbin, let every refugee in the world in.

Redneck conservatives on the right build a wall around Australia and demand everyone conform to their way of life.

Same shit different smell
 

TGFC

All Australian
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Posts
763
Likes
900
AFL Club
Adelaide
Get rid of it or don't, people will still invest in property, rents will just go up.
very few will, the number of investment properties will reduce, the house prices will then be at their actual value, rather than the inflated value that the tax breaks bring. meaning less will need to rent (they can now afford their own house). rent prices will not go up as demand will reduce for a rental property, meaning it will cycle down.
 

MattyB_76

Premium Platinum
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Posts
1,359
Likes
905
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Redlegs, Yankees, Fulham FC
I rent because I don't want long term responsibility.
Rent won't go up if less people rent
Getting rid of NG won't see investors immediately sell their properties and have them snapped up by Owner Occupiers.

Investors will keep their properties, for the capital gains, and rents will go up because investors will no longer be happy making a loss.

The Income Tax increase to the Govt will probably be returned to low income earners in a form of rent assistance.
Net benefit for the Govt = 0. Net benefit for the public = 0.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

TexForPM

Premiership Player
Joined
May 21, 2015
Posts
3,562
Likes
3,654
Location
Zegema Beach
AFL Club
Adelaide
Getting rid of NG won't see investors immediately sell their properties and have them snapped up by Owner Occupiers.

Investors will keep their properties, for the capital gains, and rents will go up because investors will no longer be happy making a loss.

The Income Tax increase to the Govt will probably be returned to low income earners in a form of rent assistance.
Net benefit for the Govt = 0. Net benefit for the public = 0.
You see it all the time. Investments won't go up when people will look elsewhere for affordability.
When no ones paying rent for 1-2 months investors re-think their percentage of profit. Simples.
 

TGFC

All Australian
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Posts
763
Likes
900
AFL Club
Adelaide
Getting rid of NG won't see investors immediately sell their properties and have them snapped up by Owner Occupiers.

Investors will keep their properties, for the capital gains, and rents will go up because investors will no longer be happy making a loss.

The Income Tax increase to the Govt will probably be returned to low income earners in a form of rent assistance.
Net benefit for the Govt = 0. Net benefit for the public = 0.
there wont be any capital gains because no new investors will enter the market. rents wont go up, rental tenants will hit a threshold that when rents equal the cost of loan repayments, due to some jumping out early, then the whole industry that is investment properties dies. it will happen quickly, akin to ripping off a band aid.
 

dogs105

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jan 12, 2002
Posts
28,621
Likes
33,124
Location
Edinburgh
AFL Club
Adelaide
How? Half of each incremental dollar I earn goes in tax as it is! Blood out of a stone.
That's great for you (seriously) - you are earning more than $180,000 pa. It's just that for people on lower incomes, GST increases hurt them more in proportion than for those on higher incomes.

I think it would be good to have a tax system similar to some Scandinavian countries - and also with their education, health, and public support systems.

Also,

 

Freddy Bassett

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
9,433
Likes
4,537
Location
At Work
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
PANTHERS,CHELSEA
Let's just make GST 15% and claim CGT for IPs and be done with it.
Let's not raise GST!

As for Danger, I am over him...
He is a champion player but he can go...
Obviously puts himself above our great club...
Won't even commit to us for probably a million a year cause it is such a burden being the biggest superstar in Adelaide...

Lets not sugar coat it any more... He is leaving, our coach got murdered but even that wasn't enough for him to commit.

I just hope our club matches Danger for ruthlessness on the trade table and we do him NO favours...

Rant over
 

Freddy Bassett

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
9,433
Likes
4,537
Location
At Work
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
PANTHERS,CHELSEA
That's great for you (seriously) - you are earning more than $180,000 pa. It's just that for people on lower incomes, GST increases hurt them more in proportion than for those on higher incomes.

I think it would be good to have a tax system similar to some Scandinavian countries - and also with their education, health, and public support systems.

Also,

I like your views!

I am heading over to Edinburgh in November for 2 months, any tips of where to go?
 

TGFC

All Australian
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Posts
763
Likes
900
AFL Club
Adelaide
That's great for you (seriously) - you are earning more than $180,000 pa. It's just that for people on lower incomes, GST increases hurt them more in proportion than for those on higher incomes.

I think it would be good to have a tax system similar to some Scandinavian countries - and also with their education, health, and public support systems.

Also,

ah ha education, lets expect people to pay huge amounts of money just for a piece of paper that gives a person a better chance at teaching others (teaching). How in the world can we expect all vital services to pay for their own education and still get the best people doing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom