Sometimes I wonder if you are just joking around with some of your strange positions on things
You are now arguing an entirely different point.
Let's recap shall we?
I said:
You replied with some examples of players that had signed on early:
I said we shouldnt expect him to sign just because your examples did:
Then somehow you showing examples shows that we should expect it:
I said why not - and didn't miss Tex out on purpose, you can add him in if you like it doesn't change my point:
Now you are arguing that it is not unreasonable to expect Dangerfield to sign, because it's an entirely normal thing to do:
I think you may be just stirring? Or your logic would also be ok with Woody Allen's classic:
“All men are mortal. Socrates was mortal. Therefore, all men are Socrates.”