Power Raid
We Exist To Win Premierships
Looks like its on its way,,,,
westpac is calling 2018 as the toughest year but positive growth lead by the US until then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like its on its way,,,,
Looks like its on its way,,,,
Highest Government spending in ten years, highest unemployment figures in ten years, lowest job growth in ten years, biggest debt levels in ten years.
Lucky we've got the "economic managers" in power
I think we will avoid it, if only because the govt will be so desperate to not have that mark on their record.
Highest Government spending in ten years, highest unemployment figures in ten years, lowest job growth in ten years, biggest debt levels in ten years.
Brazil, Canada and Russia all in recession. All commodity reliant economies.
Humour, write cheques to dead people, that will fix it.
Yep we are now paying the price for obscene levels of spending when commodity prices were at boom levels. Economic management indeed.
What impact did;How is any of that relevant? Yes sure the last govt was utterly useless and this one has spent far too much, however, that means bugger all in terms of the impact on Australia with respect to falling commodity prices.
Has Shorten come out lately and supported spending significant cuts or did I miss that?
Have on people?...write cheques to dead people
Sometimes I wonder whether increased productivity just means flogging the poor worker a little harder!but not all beer and skittles
we have a serious issue with productivity which is a real concern for the nation
dare I say it, no govt will deal with it as it is a political hot potato as howard found out
Sometimes I wonder whether increased productivity just means flogging the poor worker a little harder!
If you look at the 7/11 story that seems right, although technology is the main pusher of productivity so it depends on the area you're working in. Generally jobs should get easier with technology helping out, but of course it allows one worker to do more and consequently the benefits are a lower requirement for staff and therefore greater profits for management. In Australia we've been pretty good at bumping the minimum wage along so the personal requirements for productivity have probably been upped by management to balance that out. Enterprise agreements certainly focus of productivity for pay. But if your job isn't helped by technology, then your right they may just get flogged, especially if your in the vulnerable position of being on a Visa.Sometimes I wonder whether increased productivity just means flogging the poor worker a little harder!
It certainly shouldn't. I would love to see the 35 hour working week enshrined here and as a global standard.
We should look to address our productivity but our bigger issue socially is participation. We have way too many locked out of employment.
I was surprised to find paper and pen still being used in a large company I was at, although it was for things that would be checked by audit, so perhaps they were doing that deliberately to give more plausible deniability and make it harder for auditors. Less explainable is that the technology brought in to increase productivity, such as coding, wasn't understood by many people so when it stuffed up, fixing it was an expensive exercise that they often didn't do. There's a chance that people who understood it had been promoted, but they were so busy due to staff cuts, the chances of getting them to come back and fix it were limited. The amount of productivity lost must be immense when you look at the 25% churn rate of staff in some industries.I heard somewhere that even with all the new technology we have, productivity hasn't risen and historically the change in technologies has predated the lift in productivity from that new tech by 20 years.
The managers are set in their ways and don't understand the new technology, then they shuffle off and new wave come in.
How is any of that relevant?
Were you a secretary, EA, or hiding behind the pot plant?In board meetings, I would always work from hard copies and note questions and answers.
Will be hard from 2017 onwards - manufacturing shutdowns kick in, flow on effects... one analysis estimated 200k jobs in total for the new government (post next Fed election) to deal with.wait for the unemployment figures when we try and pay down the debt
oh dear, there will be some tears
Some trials in the US have focused on a 36 hour, 4 day week. I'd love thatIt certainly shouldn't. I would love to see the 35 hour working week enshrined here and as a global standard.
When you consider the amount of goodwill, and political capital enjoyed by the PM when he entered office; to have pissed it all against the wall inside two years is remarkable.
Some trials in the US have focused on a 36 hour, 4 day week. I'd love that
In a thread about Recession, only the conservative poster would say the following about GDP:
But back in the real world, I think 35 hours a week is a great start.
Were you a secretary, EA, or hiding behind the pot plant?
But back in the real world, I think 35 hours a week is a great start. Think of all the spare time you will have to find a job, if you only spend 35 hours on BF.
Some trials in the US have focused on a 36 hour, 4 day week. I'd love that
lol. Your graphs were utterly irrelevant to the issue of falling commodity prices. blah blah blah.