Remove this Banner Ad

Ref Watch

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

glenferry23 said:
To be fair it's quite to difficult to speak or make any noise (aside from an incomprehensible mumble) when Mourinho's **** is permanently jammed in his mouth.
Click to expand...
Funny how you're quoting Magma who walks around with a picture of Guardiola's.
 
So from this point forth - Mourinho time shall be referred to when a team is given far less than the just amount of stoppage time when chasing a game.

Oh and Hull fan I won't bring up the League Cup decisions - I guess on a technicality you could argue the penalty was technically available to give - even though it was a blatant dive. (jumping forwards when having a small shirt tug pulling in the opposite direction)
But if we're talking penalties on technicalities then things like handballing and pushing people off balance in the penalty area are fair awards as well, right?

Oh that's right. We only mention the small number of (linesman) decisions that favour United.
We don't bring up the thousands which don't.

Funny that.
 
apollo_creed said:
How many of them impacted the result of a game? Answer? 1.
So that's one point gained from a bad decision. The other two were both nothing/meaningless goals.

Now how many blatant penalties and incorrect decisions have cost United points this season?
lol. We're talking probably about 10 points.

Funny how people are silent about all the decisions from referees they don't get.

Real funny.
Click to expand...

You're into a Cup Final because of an offside goal.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

apollo_creed said:
So from this point forth - Mourinho time shall be referred to when a team is given far less than the just amount of stoppage time when chasing a game.

Oh and Hull fan I won't bring up the League Cup decisions - I guess on a technicality you could argue the penalty was technically available to give - even though it was a blatant dive. (jumping forwards when having a small shirt tug pulling in the opposite direction)
But if we're talking penalties on technicalities then things like handballing and pushing people off balance in the penalty area are fair awards as well, right?

Oh that's right. We only mention the small number of (linesman) decisions that favour United.
We don't bring up the thousands which don't.

Funny that.
Click to expand...

A fistful of shirt and then jumping into the back of a player (who then highlighted the contact by lunging forward, you are correct) is still a penalty for a fistful of shirt. Cute of you to bend over backwards to somehow try and get out of admitting it was a pen, but you got there in the end.

5 minutes of added time is adequate when 3 minutes (not 4, not sure where you get that from) is the standard amount, given there was about a minute spent treating players who clashed heads, and another minute for the time wasted when United players whinged about decisions rather than getting on with playing.
 
SM said:
A fistful of shirt and then jumping into the back of a player (who then highlighted the contact by lunging forward, you are correct) is still a penalty for a fistful of shirt. Cute of you to bend over backwards to somehow try and get out of admitting it was a pen, but you got there in the end.

5 minutes of added time is adequate when 3 minutes (not 4, not sure where you get that from) is the standard amount, given there was about a minute spent treating players who clashed heads, and another minute for the time wasted when United players whinged about decisions rather than getting on with playing.
Click to expand...
Hahahaha if you think five minutes was adequate then i'm wasting my time. In relation to the offside goal, if the rashford or the other penalty was given then they go through. In other words the right team went through in the end. Another cup final for the great man.
 
apollo_creed said:
Hahahaha if you think five minutes was adequate then i'm wasting my time. In relation to the offside goal, if the rashford or the other penalty was given then they go through. In other words the right team went through in the end. Another cup final for the great man.
Click to expand...

I'm still unsure why you're so fixated on the added time, because all I can do is compare the time given to every single other PL game.. ever. No game ever does an AFL and adds on all of the time wasted - whether from subs, goals, ball out of play, injuries, etc. - 5 minutes was perfectly adequate and he even added an extra 90 seconds onto that and you still didn't score.

If if if. Cry more. Meyler on Rashford wasn't even a foul let alone a penalty (especially as it was paid and was outside the box....) "The other penalty" is real specific but there were no legitimate penalty shouts for United in that game.
 
castlesletter.jpg
 
If stoppage time always included all the wasted time by teams playing for a draw, halves would last 60 minutes
 

Remove this Banner Ad

SM said:
I'm still unsure why you're so fixated on the added time, because all I can do is compare the time given to every single other PL game.. ever. No game ever does an AFL and adds on all of the time wasted - whether from subs, goals, ball out of play, injuries, etc. - 5 minutes was perfectly adequate and he even added an extra 90 seconds onto that and you still didn't score.

If if if. Cry more. Meyler on Rashford wasn't even a foul let alone a penalty (especially as it was paid and was outside the box....) "The other penalty" is real specific but there were no legitimate penalty shouts for United in that game.
Click to expand...
Huddlestone...
Very interesting memory you possess. In no way was five minutes accurate and reflective of the extreme, cheating instances of timewasting which occurred. By far the worst i have seen from any team in the PL for a long, long time. Should've at minimum been seven originally. Anyway keep selectively tallying those decisions that go against/for your side. It's amusing if nothing else.

Enjoy watching another team playing in the League Cup final.
Kee enjoying the referees
 
hawkman said:
If stoppage time always included all the wasted time by teams playing for a draw, halves would last 60 minutes
Click to expand...
This was excessive. Far more than anything seen this season. I have seen far less time wasting and more added time given. Funny that.
 
apollo_creed said:
Huddlestone...
Very interesting memory you possess. In no way was five minutes accurate and reflective of the extreme, cheating instances of timewasting which occurred. By far the worst i have seen from any team in the PL for a long, long time. Should've at minimum been seven originally. Anyway keep selectively tallying those decisions that go against/for your side. It's amusing if nothing else.

Enjoy watching another team playing in the League Cup final.
Kee enjoying the referees
Click to expand...

Clucas...

Are we naming Hull City CMs? What did Huddlestone do?

Cheating lol. I'm checking out of this now, you have serious issues.
 
SM said:
Lol, cry more.

I've already said elsewhere Niasse was lucky to stay on, what more do you want?

Cheating from Hull players hey?

Click to expand...

comical from Ibra, lol.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's a weird infatuation you have with Mou AC, what is so appealing about him?
 
SM said:
Clucas...

Are we naming Hull City CMs? What did Huddlestone do?

Cheating lol. I'm checking out of this now, you have serious issues.
Click to expand...
Nope you just don't know when to admit you got lucky.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top