Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Remaining List Changes?

Who is still to be delisted prior to final list lodgement?

  • Lambert

    Votes: 41 22.5%
  • A Moore

    Votes: 140 76.9%
  • Batchelor

    Votes: 23 12.6%
  • Butler

    Votes: 99 54.4%
  • Morris

    Votes: 24 13.2%
  • Townsend

    Votes: 45 24.7%
  • Yarren

    Votes: 7 3.8%

  • Total voters
    182

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Should have got rid of moore earlier and taken richards with a nothing draft pick . Club has been over most things this trade period , but IMO let its gaurd down on this one. It also isn't with hindsight , I was suggesting it as trade period closed.
We didn't need to delist moore to do that, we had enough spaces, then do it afterward.
 
offered a contract then got delisted for crawling back like a mutt- did he just shit on his brothers legacy-? no dick head policy---? jaded and average---???

not sure about this one/

Yeah you're right. He's rubbish and we shouldn't try and get him. Were blessed with KPP already
 
Hopefully we kick the tires on Litherland, Schade & Richards. See if they are willing to sign a one year deal to add depth


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Everyone goes on like we are the only club that delist players.


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yet there are some of us who go on like we dont delist enough.

Lets be honest we could easily cut half the list or more and lose very little.All it will leave is a 5 or 6 proven players a few foot soldiers and a heap of juniors.
The footy club never cuts players we give em 2yr extensions that usually takes them into long service leave.
 
Yet there are some of us who go on like we dont delist enough.

Lets be honest we could easily cut half the list or more and lose very little.All it will leave is a 5 or 6 proven players a few foot soldiers and a heap of juniors.
The footy club never cuts players we give em 2yr extensions that usually takes them into long service leave.
Couldn't agree more. I have on numerous occasions heard people mutter words stating we retain our players and nobody wants to leave. Pretty obvious and the Conca scenario was the classic case.
 
Last edited:
Couldn't agree more. I have on numerous occasions heard people mutter words stating we retain our players and nobody wants to leave. Pretty obvious and the Conca scenario was the classic case.

Exactly. Conca should have been de-listed. Even just to prove a point.
He wanted out, so you know his mind isn't with the club. Why keep him here if he's not 100% commited.
He needs to have the best season of his life to get me back onside, It'l be a struggle for him. Don't rate him in the best 22
 
We didn't need to delist moore to do that, we had enough spaces, then do it afterward.
Not point hanging on to him though if not one of the players that we are undecided on. Gives him a chance to get to another club, but more chance of me winning the lottery than that happening.
 
Couldn't agree more. I have on numerous occasions heard people mutter words stating we retain our players and nobody wants to leave. Pretty obvious and the Conca scenario was the classic case.

Conca would be in my 22 if fit & playing 2013 - 2014 form.
BUT
2 years with less than 10 games warrants delist.
A 1 year contract maybe, to see how the legs go, but not 2 years.
Even though best 22, I think he now needs to earn his stripes again in the 2's and dislodge someone from the 1's.
Maybe still trade bait in 2018.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Conca would be in my 22 if fit & playing 2013 - 2014 form.
BUT
2 years with less than 10 games warrants delist.
A 1 year contract maybe, to see how the legs go, but not 2 years.
Even though best 22, I think he now needs to earn his stripes again in the 2's and dislodge someone from the 1's.
Maybe still trade bait in 2018.
The football world has moved on from Reece except for the RFC. I look at Short who was rookied who has more upside.
Reece is nothing special and now is one of those so called back up players which we seem to have a pile of.
 
I really do wish people would actually watch players rather than making comments based on the media because if you had watched Barlow you would know he still has plenty to offer and he played some real good footy this yr.

2IQ4NLZ-suHmFuNZ-uuoRsC3xbLFhSgNVHvmKFLyQowL06peV40Wiuopad_9Il8D6bw2OFaO4TNWe996ByQ48bxy3A2SNtpjNS6fO32Y8GokAi5JPKav0d2GkdgLyJ_T94OM=w300-h300-nc
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Are you Reece Conca - guessing from your name? Only 4 live picks in a strong draft pool and with some tempting DFAs seems too few.
No Prestia is refered to as the human meatball
 
Not point hanging on to him though if not one of the players that we are undecided on. Gives him a chance to get to another club, but more chance of me winning the lottery than that happening.
Sure but wasn't the point I way making. I was just saying considering we have more list culling dates we could have got him him without delisting anybody at that point.
 
We've picked up two quality players, but our ruthless list review hasn't cut very deep.
Chaplin retired mid-season, McKenzie for health reasons.
Losing TV was always going to happen. Lids traded out was a surprise but not the end of the world.

So we've delisted McBean, Marcon and Moore; three spuds that will be hard pressed to get a contract anywhere else. Is that it? Or is the review working alphabetically and only got to the M's?
 
In all defence to the club (and I stand to be corrected), pretty difficult to negotiate a contract with like 3 days in the trade period left.
Why ?
two conversations were needed.
Manager : Whats he want ? Sign here .
Sydney : We'll give you pick xxx. sign here.
All of 20 minutes tops and you cant tell me his manager wasnt sounding out clubs prior to the trade period .
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom