Remove this Banner Ad

Ricky Ponting

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

And while the Australians aren't perfect - I was very disappointed no-one was shaking Kumble's hand while they revved each other and the crowd - I won't be heading to India for lectures about the integrity of the game either.

I think he has lost respect from most Aussies. To go and question the spirit of Australia's game was just beyond poor.

Kumble didn't even shake the umpires hand ffs let alone Punter's.
 
I have to agree with a lot of the comments on here, especially from MBP... and have to say that as a spectator of cricket, I don't care if a player decides not to walk, or over-do an appeal to influence the umpire. And to be honest, in the sporting arena, I'm not too fussed about integrity in sport (unless, of course, it is an illegality such as match-fixing or drugs). Remember, these guys are paid to do just one thing- win. So what if the players decided to stand their ground. Their job is to win- it is what they get paid to do. The umpires job is to make the decision whether the player is out or not- that is what they get paid to do. In a game where you get paid lots of money to remain victorious, you would be stupid to start walking before the umpires finger goes up.

If Clarke hadn't had that killer over, this would all be a moot point. Its sour grapes by Kumble, a man that I had mountains of respect for. And I wonder how much his comments were meant to take some of the heat away from Harbarjhan. On that topic, this is the farce in world cricket today. And I can't understand the irony of a country like India allowing their players to show such dissent- these guys would cop a pile of it because of the colour of their skin. And the irony lies in the fact that they have again targeted the only black player in the Australian team with stupid immature comments. This is why racism will never die out- the vilified become the vilifiers in a vicious circle.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Clarke standing on a ball nicked to first slip was bullshit.

It looked inconclusive to me, and to suggest a player would commit professional suicide by blatantly lying in these days of frame by frame video replays is ridiculous.

India are mentally soft.

They are the Hawthorn of the I.C.C.
 
It looked inconclusive to me, and to suggest a player would commit professional suicide by blatantly lying in these days of frame by frame video replays is ridiculous.

India are mentally soft.

They are the Hawthorn of the I.C.C.

Yep, and the player in question being the golden boy of Australian sport for today and years to come.
 
If only those hard nosed indians would cop it on the chin and live with it. Very hard for them to move on.

Jeez, GR... I just go on a rant about vilification in sport and then you single out the 'hard-nosed Indians'.

For shame:D
 
Think of it as another term for being stubborn. Sorry.:eek:

I know, champ... in fact, can hard-nosed really be a racial trait??:)

Who wears a leather jacket when he eats a meal at an Indian Restaurant.

I dislike Clark.

You got it all wrong, RB... it was a 'Pleather' jacket. See? All good.

He just wouldn't dare wear it in Pakistan, where I believe large plastic cows are considered god-like:D

But, yeah. I dislike Clarke too, but don't hate him.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Am I the only one finds it hilarious that a nation that has continually played the neutral umpire and race card is breaking the decibel record for whinging?

They had Australia on the rack after the first 3 hours of the test match, yet found themselves on the rack in the last three hours.

Buncha sooks.:thumbsdown:

Agreed:thumbsu:
 
It looked inconclusive to me, and to suggest a player would commit professional suicide by blatantly lying in these days of frame by frame video replays is ridiculous.

India are mentally soft.

They are the Hawthorn of the I.C.C.


What looked inconclusive about Clarkes nick to first slip?

Its funny to see that on this board that poor umpiring is accepted because Australia won but if the Kangaroos get a bad dose we are up in arms.

The fact is that Symonds was gone not once but twice in the first innings,
Ponting was out before his lbw and Dravid was most certainly not out.

The Indians are more than entitled to have a sook.
 
Australia play within the "spirit of cricket" but only while things are going their way. The minute things turn tough, as they did on Saturday, incidents occur. The whole Harbajahn thing started with a playful tap on Lee's bum by Harbajahn which Symonds (not Lee) decided to take offence to.

I'm sure the Aussies practice their appealing just to put added pressure on the umpires. The umps are such duds (and seemingly anxious to please their hosts) that they end up cracking under the relentless pressure.

Gilchrist is so "fair" that when he appeals everyone thinks it must be out. That Dravid one was a shocker. Earlier on there was a massive appeal for a catch against Kumble but the replay showed he'd hit it into the ground then onto his boot. Bring in the technology to help the umpires. Please!!!

Ponting put that ball on the ground while it was still in his hand, before claiming the catch (even if he is our number one ticket holder). I'm not sure that you can claim a catch in those circumstances.

A great test match, spoiled throughout by dud umpiring decisions which cut both ways but still favoured the Aussies.
 
How about not walking when you know your out and Im not just talking about Symonds. Michael Clarke did the same thing. Surely you dont need the umpire to put his finger up when you know you have hit it and have clearly been caught.

How about also appealing for a catch when you know that the batsman didnt hit it which was what happened with Dravid.
Have you ever watched the Indians appeal and carry on when they play at home?

Also remember how Ian Botham had to bowl around that Fat umpire years back? That's the sort of horseshit sides have had to put up with playing in India for years.

Yeah I know we have neutral umpires now but the Fat Indian Umpire had to be mentioned. It's all because of him.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Dravid was most certainly not out.

Swings and roundabouts, Dravid got away with a plumb LBW that Billy Bowden missed in the Melbourne Test. Everyone gets good ones and bad ones. And the Indians should be the last ones to whinge about umpiring and not playing in the spirit of the game, the intimidation of umpires on the sub-continent is discaceful, if you have Foxtel and watch some of the games telcast from there you'll know what I mean. Go back a few more years to when home umjpires stood in Tests and the blatant hometown decisions that went on in the sub-continent was mindboggling. People have very short memories.:rolleyes:
 
Australia play within the "spirit of cricket" but only while things are going their way. The minute things turn tough, as they did on Saturday, incidents occur. The whole Harbajahn thing started with a playful tap on Lee's bum by Harbajahn which Symonds (not Lee) decided to take offence to.

I'm sure the Aussies practice their appealing just to put added pressure on the umpires. The umps are such duds (and seemingly anxious to please their hosts) that they end up cracking under the relentless pressure.

Gilchrist is so "fair" that when he appeals everyone thinks it must be out. That Dravid one was a shocker. Earlier on there was a massive appeal for a catch against Kumble but the replay showed he'd hit it into the ground then onto his boot. Bring in the technology to help the umpires. Please!!!

Ponting put that ball on the ground while it was still in his hand, before claiming the catch (even if he is our number one ticket holder). I'm not sure that you can claim a catch in those circumstances.

A great test match, spoiled throughout by dud umpiring decisions which cut both ways but still favoured the Aussies.
**** - can we launch a mutiny against Dingster and install Mr Reliable?

This is sterling.
 
Ponting put that ball on the ground while it was still in his hand, before claiming the catch (even if he is our number one ticket holder). I'm not sure that you can claim a catch in those circumstances.

He'd caught and controlled the ball before the ball came in contact with the ground, and it was still in his possession. They were talking about that issue on Fox Sports and according to the laws of the game, it was a fair catch. So there's one decision that the Indians got in their favour.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Ricky Ponting

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top