Quadrant online editor Roger Franklin laments that Manchester blast was not against ABC
http://www.theage.com.au/national/q...last-was-not-against-abc-20170523-gwbreb.html
Wanting to kill panelists and the studio audience of ABC's Q&A programme...I wouldn't think such a notion would align with Australia's Judeo-Christian values that we hold so dear. Is this just an outlier, a lone-wolf view if you will? Or is it an extremist view with a significant enough following in the community to justify the banning of all who subscribe to these beliefs? Why this man cannot assimilate with our values and view on the sanctity of life is beyond me.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/q...last-was-not-against-abc-20170523-gwbreb.html
The Australian Federal Police has been notified that the online editor of the Australian conservative journal Quadrant wrote an opinion piece saying that, "had there been a shred of justice", the Manchester blast would have "detonated in an Ultimo TV studio".
He added that, if such an attack took place, "none of the panel's likely casualties would have represented the slightest reduction in humanity's intelligence, decency, empathy or honesty".
Wanting to kill panelists and the studio audience of ABC's Q&A programme...I wouldn't think such a notion would align with Australia's Judeo-Christian values that we hold so dear. Is this just an outlier, a lone-wolf view if you will? Or is it an extremist view with a significant enough following in the community to justify the banning of all who subscribe to these beliefs? Why this man cannot assimilate with our values and view on the sanctity of life is beyond me.