Yep. I've boycotted all of their games in Melbourne this year.Kinda like WC and Hungry Jacks eh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. I've boycotted all of their games in Melbourne this year.Kinda like WC and Hungry Jacks eh?
The Taliban blew up religious sites because they are zealots.
There was no such malice in what Rio Tinto did. There wasn't a group of white men in a meeting saying "how can we blow up ancient aboriginal caves?"
It goes hand in handKinda like WC and Hungry Jacks eh?
Kinda like WC and Hungry Jacks eh?
Nah, more like freo and McDonald'sKinda like WC and Hungry Jacks eh?
Nah, Fremantle just take Maccas money as a minor sponsor, they don't use their players to promote junk food to kids like WCE do (after hypocritically doing a complete 360 on the issue).Nah, more like freo and McDonald's
Lol..so FOSNah, Fremantle just take Maccas money as a minor sponsor, they don't use their players to promote junk food to kids like WCE do (after hypocritically doing a complete 360 on the issue).
Why can't people deem it unacceptable now? Do they have to keep the same stance just to remain consistent with a previous generation of people?I note with interest that the WA government (and the people who elect it) is inconsequential to the rag that is The Guardian and its oh so predictable, outrage addicted readers.
Despite that government specifically approving this action and hundreds of others like it for decades (in reality not just approving but actively encouraging). Without a peep of protest from the broader WA community who are far more attached to their mining royalties and fat FIFO incomes.
Are they not allowed to do both?But hey. It's much more satisfying getting all outraged at an evil corporation.
That's not what articles say about the process in Australia specifically. What happens in other parts of the world isn't relevant.The truth is that sites of archeological significance are identified in the way of commercial activity all over the world on a routine basis. And just as routinely the activity is put on hold, the archeology gets done, and then away we go.
I'm lost. Did Hungry Jack's blow up an Aboriginal cultural heritage site?Kinda like WC and Hungry Jacks eh?
Why can't people deem it unacceptable now? Do they have to keep the same stance just to remain consistent with a previous generation of people?
By the way, this demolition was approved in 2013 by the Barnett government, not the present government.
That's not what articles say about the process in Australia specifically. What happens in other parts of the world isn't relevant.
No, I can assure you I am not the government.Yes. Deem it unacceptable if you wish.
But don't hide behind party politics. You are the government, and let me break the news to it. The party or the name at the head of a government make SFA difference.
No, I can assure you I am not the government.
I didn't know one had to be either the government or a non-voting anarchist. What a dichotomy that is.So your a non-voting anarchist?
Okay, so what's the problem with people taking issue with it now?Ok. Let me make it really simple. Hundreds of these applications have been made in WA alone, in a mining context alone, and approved.
Which is quite consistent with longstanding and current processes in this country and other countries in a multitude of different settings.
Are you saying that because people didn't complain about it before, they're not allowed to complain now? Even if the people involved are different?Geez Louise. Maybe this example has special merit for outrage, maybe it does not have special merit for outrage and it is the one among literally hundreds the great unwashed have got their panties in a bunch over without any particular reason on merit.
You seem very determined to conflate me with the government. Are you under the impression that I am the current or former WA Minister for Aboriginal Affairs?Either way, it is the government (IE you) that bears the major share of responsibility.
Why can't people deem it unacceptable now? Do they have to keep the same stance just to remain consistent with a previous generation of people?
By the way, this demolition was approved in 2013 by the Barnett government, not the present government.
Are they not allowed to do both?
That's not what articles say about the process in Australia specifically. What happens in other parts of the world isn't relevant.
Well I can live With the Million Dollar Man Ted Dibiase Runnning the AFL. He is an artist of making money.
Everybodies got a price
Gil doesn't care
Yes. Deem it unacceptable if you wish.
But don't hide behind party politics. You are the government, and let me break the news to you. The party or the name at the head of a government make SFA difference.
Ok. Let me make it really simple. Hundreds of these applications have been made in WA alone, in a mining context alone, and approved.
Which is quite consistent with longstanding and current processes in this country and other countries in a multitude of different settings.
Geez Louise. Maybe this example has special merit for outrage, maybe it does not have special merit for outrage and it is the one among literally hundreds the great unwashed have got their panties in a bunch over without any particular reason on merit.
Either way, it is the government (IE you) that bears the major share of responsibility.
Woke capitalism.
It's the same with Sydney - they participate in the gay pride match and yet gladly accept $$$ from Qatar.
It's astounding how stupid they think we are.
Okay, so what's the problem with people taking issue with it now?
Are you saying that because people didn't complain about it before, they're not allowed to complain now? Even if the people involved are different?
You seem very determined to conflate me with the government. Are you under the impression that I am the current or former WA Minister for Aboriginal Affairs?
That's some lovely word salad you've made there. By the way, are you the government or a non-voting anarchist? Since we apparently have to be one or the other.No. I am under the impression that you are a person who will go through any type of mental gymnastics to maintain the virtue signalling rage at an evil corporation, and without the maturity to accept that this whole furore is a brief flash of indulgence which in the long term will change nothing.