RIP President George Bush

[Thegibbsgamble]

There seems to be two types of tyrant, tyrants that destroyed their own country and tyrants that destroyed other countries through conquest. Ghengis was obviously of the second category. Good for his own people but bad for others. Bush senior is not an extreme tyrant personally, but part of a tyrannical cartel, plutarchy and machine. This cartel is rabidly successful having an empire larger richer and more technologically advanced than any known. Bush junior is more like a tyrant that ruined his own country which is what sometimes happen when incompetent sons take over their greater fathers reigns.

The big picture is the world's elite are scared of the next war. Nukes means nobody is safe. They want a one world government. That is achieved by multi nationals having power. George Bush took the biggest strides towards this. His son phuqed alot of it up.

When you understand this. Then we can't talk about tyrants. None bigger than the house of Windsor.

 

[Geelong_Sicko]

Without him, there'd probably be about 12 billion people on the planet today, chunking up the Pacific with their bits of plastic even worse than we are with our 7 billion.

Ironic the smaller population considering the speculation that ole Genghis himself was one of histories maddest rooters.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-456789/Genghis-Khan-The-daddy-lovers.html

...After analysing tissue samples in populations bordering Mongolia, scientists from the Russian Academy of Sciences believe the brutal ruler has 16 million male descendants living today, meaning that he must have fathered hundreds, if not thousands, of children.

And as the geneticists agree, it can be explained only by Genghis Khan's policy of seizing for himself the most beautiful women captured in the course of his merciless conquests...

 

[Proud SJW]

Ironic the smaller population considering the speculation that ole Genghis himself was one of histories maddest rooters.

Well, no, that would have been Mao, according to legend. Four virgins a day delivered to his door, or something like that. Which was probably a legend on par with Kim Yong Il being a godly golfer, but who the hell knows. There are an awful lot of people in China, and I'm told they all look the same, so maybe there's something in it.

But all the rooting in the world isn't going to replace a few million casualties of sword-swinging barbaric hordes with murderous intent, without a significant amount of time passing.

There's actually a book out there detailing how the depopulation of half a continent in the wake of Genghis led to re-forestation of farmland, and the subsequent global cooling. I mean, I'd take estimates of the overall effect with a grain of salt, but the theory itself may not be entirely wrong. Wildlife in the area around Chernobyl, by way of example, is flourishing. Apparently, nuclear fallout is less dangerous to the environment than humans are, which is something that has to make one sfellow just a little teeny bit. Given a choice between living in proximity to humanity, and their children being potentially born as Blinky the three eyed fish, nature is making its feelings well known.

Honestly speaking, a holocaust on the scale of Genghis would probably be quite welcome in China today. Only real problem is the method. Nukes ruin everyone's day. There's absolutely no point in getting rid of the enemy if you can't use his land afterward.

 

[Geelong_Sicko]

There's absolutely no point in getting rid of the enemy if you can't use his land afterward.

Yeah, that's why 'scorched earth' is a tactic used by defenders. Make the land as useless as possible for the conqueror.

 

[Northalives]

You are deranged and in need of an editor.

Pretty rich coming from an apologist for the murderer, war criminal, terrorist and fraudster Netanyahu.

 

[its free real estate]

Pretty rich coming from an apologist for the murderer, war criminal, terrorist and fraudster Netanyahu.

Everyone is a war criminal according to you.

 

[Northalives]

Everyone is a war criminal according to you.

Sorry, meant to say mass murderer and exporter of terrorism. I wonder if he had anything to do with Rabin's assassination?

 

[Proud SJW]

Everyone is a war criminal according to you.

That's because they made up a bunch of laws a few decades ago regarding how war was to be prosecuted. It's how they determine who is good and who is bad.

See, it's like this. You're allowed to bomb people. You're allowed to shoot them, knife them, disembowel them. You're allowed to smash their skulls in with bricks, if it comes down to that.
But you are absolutely not allowed to shoot a guy if he takes out half your platoon with a machine gun and then surrenders. If you do that, it'll be you they put up against a wall. Because that's against the rules.

Any notion of a war "criminal" is an absurdity.
The West thinking otherwise is one reason they've mostly forgotten how to win a fight.

 

[bfff]

That's because they made up a bunch of laws a few decades ago regarding how war was to be prosecuted. It's how they determine who is good and who is bad.

See, it's like this. You're allowed to bomb people. You're allowed to shoot them, knife them, disembowel them. You're allowed to smash their skulls in with bricks, if it comes down to that.
But you are absolutely not allowed to shoot a guy if he takes out half your platoon with a machine gun and then surrenders. If you do that, it'll be you they put up against a wall. Because that's against the rules.

Any notion of a war "criminal" is an absurdity.
The West thinking otherwise is one reason they've mostly forgotten how to win a fight.

Do you think all rules of war absurd? I can see how it is rather absurd to try and encode the correct action in the scenario you described. What of those laws that are intended to protect civilians?

I would contend the West intentionally does not finish its fights and that there is very little that goes completely unpermitted.

 

[its free real estate]

Do you think all rules of war absurd? I can see how it is rather absurd to try and encode the correct action in the scenario you described. What of those laws that are intended to protect civilians?

I would contend the West intentionally does not finish its fights and that there is very little that goes completely unpermitted.

The rules of war are made by the victors after they win wars.

 

[Northalives]

Wars are about making money and getting rid of some of your poor: there are no rules!

 

[maryjames]

What a relief one of the biggest mafia figures to walk the earth dies.