I'm "comfortable" with Vlaustin not getting fined, but I would have probably been just as comfortable if he hadn't and the MRO from that moment on penalise anyone who throws their head back to make it look like they got hit in the face (those ones to milk high contact), take a tough stance on players to hopefully make it easier for umpires.
Add in fining Players jumping forward the moment they feel contact at every opportunity, make it easier for umpires again. Use the system to help umpires and change player behaviour dont need to change interpretations for them.
On the bolded. This act of sending it to the tribunal is Exhibit A of the system being set up poorly to police the game with the message/optics the AFL wants to convey.
Lynch has engaged in off the ball acts 3 weeks in a row, 2 striking offences, a misconduct for shoving someones head into the ground and another borderline strike (hurley one).
None are suspendable offences in isolation, the Hurley one is borderline even a fine.
But the AFL ever about the optics feels like they have to try and do something, and for the strikes i think they have a good point. But the system is not set up to police it.
It's not black and white enough for me to think there is any merit in any of this.
I know Papley took a dive but he was still mid air with momentum going in a direction. It's the same with Grimes. What happens when blatant pushes stop getting paid because someone's arms fling out as a reflex. It's the same as throwing your head back.
There are already too many rules and too many way for umpires to pay technical free kicks that do not allow the contest to flow.
If the umpires were not geed up to find every meaningless free they'd be much harder to con.