- Jul 14, 2005
- 18,723
- 29,560
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC
- Banned
- #876
Maybe but we owe him to get to 300 games giving his years of service, 2 B and F's an All Australian spot and of course loyalty.
I admit Murph has not had a great 18 months, but deserves far better than the constant crap dished at him here and on social media.
I Will be at the A League Grand Final, unable to watch the game live, but would love it if Murph stuck it up his haters tomorrow.
We don’t owe him anything.
He is playing poorly due to a combination of general decline and not having the athletic traits or proclivity to play the role we need him to. It’s not entirely his fault, but that is the nature of professional sports and when the end comes it often comes quickly.
I’m loathe to give him games on the basis of his form and our present, pressing need to prioritise younger players. Selecting him hasn’t worked in the first half of the year - what is different about this week?
He also had plenty of opportunity to move to a better performed club on a lower salary, but chose not to. In those instances it’s hard to reconcile loyalty with being well paid, and on the basis of his past few seasons we haven’t got much of a return on investment either. Not only has his performance been mediocre, as an older statesman and as a former captain his leadership has been sorely lacking.
Wouldn’t call myself a ‘hater’ in any case either. He was my favourite player from his first season until Cripps first full season. I loved his gut running and nous when he was in his prime, but the game has passed him, and I’d rather we look to other players at this point. Nothing I saw of his performance in the reserves last week leads me to believe he should be up for re-selection.