- Aug 22, 2014
- 13,670
- 49,635
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I would argue that this doesn't enhance our chances of winning.
It's picking the safest player -- highest floor, lowest ceiling -- rather than picking players who have a greater ceiling but due to being unproven the lowest floor.
If you were picking for increased likelihood of winning you pick the player with the highest ceiling.
Feels like we're in the 1980s'-1990's English cricket team selection period. Pick the team who will lose by the least rather than giving yourself the best chance to win.
That doesn't make much sense to me.
Your elite players are the ones whose high ceiling matters. The bottom 6 are the ones you want consistent, bankable output from.
Levi is in for structure. The same structure that we had prior to last week, and only went away from because of player availability. The smaller forward line worked against Adelaide...just. But that doesn't mean it's the right structure against Freo.
Newman holds his spot after coming on as the sub and performing. No issues there.
Willo is the odd one, on form anyway. But we need a 7th defender and he's been playing down back his whole career while Ramsay has spent some time down there, but more time elsewhere (mid, wing, forward). He's also 22, and plenty have had him pencilled into our future best 22 for a long while. He's hardly Cam O'Shea.
I want to see some more kids rolled through the seniors, for sure. But I can see why these changes were made.
More than anything else, I'd love to corner Luke Power and get his candid thoughts on how "ready" guys like Ramsay and Honey and Kemp are. Maybe it's not even Teague holding then back, maybe it's the development coach doing his job?