- Apr 21, 2018
- 17,035
- 21,861
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I've pencilled this in as a win from the start of the year.
John way lee .
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I've pencilled this in as a win from the start of the year.
I thought newnes was very good in the first half of the year last year for saints. I remember him being a a very good winger for a while before that so i'm confident he has it in him. But I agree he did drop away horribly towards the end of last year.The last 3 years of his career before being let go by St.Kilda is a fair sample size though.
Again, if he’s performing like Curnow or Jones, there’s no argument ... but he isn’t and hasn’t been for quite some time.
Let’s hope he finds a new lease of life but at 27, not many improve.
We’ve invested plenty in our rated youth and they need the opportunity to improve and repay.
Willo is an interesting one. I think we're one 'creative' defender too many with everyone healthy - Simo, Doc, SPS, Newman.Pretty sure there's gonna be 6 on the bench this year now. So everyone will get a better go of it now. If Newnes can add something, that will be great. But the narrative that he "deserves" a game but a Cuningham or LOB or Willo or Dow don't bewilders me.
I don't consider them a nothing side. They have between dicks to us for the last few years.. Hogan and lewis etc.
Agree. There are teams that tackle to hurt or injure. We aren't one. Too nice. Would love a Jack Steele type or even that bloke who went to * (Bloody mind has gone blank on that one).
On SM-N960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yep another team i can’t cop, the list is very long...
This is the point.
If Newnes was delivering like a Curnow or a Jones he’d be worth his place in the team.
But he hasn’t been for quite some time and in no way deserves a game over our highly rated and improving youth that are our future.
And what you expect is not necessarily the same as what the club expects.Again, what you expect from these guys is not necessarily the same as what the club expects.
Did you see Newnes shirk any contests? I'm prepared to stand corrected, but I didn't.
I saw a player who despite a pretty ordinary overall game provided plenty of run and carry. Which is exactly what he's there to do out on a wing.
We're not really comparing the two are we?
Newnes has been a regular at AFL level for over a decade. Never a star but generally a good, solid contributor for a decent side. Seemingly a well liked and respected leader, and had a contract offer to remain at the Saints.
Fasolo was at the other end of the spectrum. He was on the footy scrap heap. A well liked character but someone who wasn't consistent, wasn't a leader, but was capable of the brilliant. Had well documented issues also.
They're not even remotely similar.
That's great, so Newnes' addition throws down a real challenge to these players.
Let's hope they rise to that challenge.
Really impressed with his vigour and attack at Princes Park practice match. I would play him ahead of Newnes or even Seterfield who has been terrible to date.I’m normally quite conservative in my thoughts about selection, but after 23 tackles in round 1, I’d be seriously tempted to throw Philp in as it seems he shows tackling intent, and maybe it might be infectious?
Yeah two teams that are difficult to get a consistent read on. Both have upside but also more than occasionally show their downside. If we play like we did in quarters 2-4 of round 1, I think we can break them. They strike me as a fragile side that will take a backward step if we start well. We need to be strong with our pressure and convert on the scoreboard when we have momentum. On the other hand, if we start like we did round 1, they will jump us and they’re good as front runners (when the going isn’t tough). A massive game given we’re already 0-1 and heading to Geelong for round 3. I’m hopeful we come out firing - we’ve had nearly 3 months to stew over the round 1 start.This is a danger game
Yeah two teams that are difficult to get a consistent read on. Both have upside but also more than occasionally show their downside. If we play like we did in quarters 2-4 of round 1, I think we can break them. They strike me as a fragile side that will take a backward step if we start well. We need to be strong with our pressure and convert on the scoreboard when we have momentum. On the other hand, if we start like we did round 1, they will jump us and they’re good as front runners (when the going isn’t tough). A massive game given we’re already 0-1 and heading to Geelong for round 3. I’m hopeful we come out firing - we’ve had nearly 3 months to stew over the round 1 start.
And what you expect is not necessarily the same as what the club expects.
"Did you see Newnes shirk any contests? I'm prepared to stand corrected, but I didn't." That's the bar? I don't recall ever seeing Willo shirk a contest eiterh. I expect my senior leaders to actually win these contests and lay some tackles.
So you are suggesting Fasolo was recruited to play VFL?
Neither have I, but I'll go out on a limb and suggest laying more than 1 tackle and winning more than 2 contested possessions would also be on that list of expectation.I accept that and have never suggested otherwise.
I'll go out on a limb though and suggest leadership, experience, good disposal and powerful running is exactly what they expect from Newnes.
We haven't recruited him for his weaknesses.
Not the bar, but thought it may be a consideration given you have highlighted a number of times Newnes didn't "crack in".
I'm suggesting Newnes is a far more bankable addition to the squad than Fasolo was, for a whole host of reasons that I've already mentioned.
Martin McKay Cuningham
Betts Casboult McGovern with Silvagni off the bench.
Get the ball inside 50 enough times and we should have no trouble kicking a winning score. Excited.
Martin McKay Cuningham
Betts Casboult McGovern with Silvagni off the bench.
Get the ball inside 50 enough times and we should have no trouble kicking a winning score. Excited.
Really is an exciting mix, Cuningham and Martin both do a good job takcling and adding pressure, those 2 plus Betts have a knack of turning a few possessions into a significant impact, McKay, McGovern and Casboult are all great contested marks and should minimise the oppositions ability for intercept marks and then you have JSOS, smart hard working team player who could be a great mid size forward who create a difficult match up.
My read on our list is that players (like) Dow/Setterfield/Kennedy/Fisher/LoB all have to lift to genuine 4Q AFL standards sooner rather than later - and for these blokes who were high draft picks they should be showing 4Q ability to impact on the game.
SPS has demonstrated AFL ability for 4Q playing HBF and doing it very well. Weitering and Walsh are proven genuine AFL players, in my books anyway.
Charlie/Harry/Cuningham/Williamson in my books are all genuine AFL quality players - but they all have one unfortunate thing in common.
Newnes is the least of our problems - I'd rather him with ball in hand kicking into forward 50 than either of Setterfield or Dow - and Dow at this stage is the biggest concern amongst the lot - he was awful against tuggers, anyone can tackle a bloke like Dow with his burst leg speed should be able to bring anyone down just by running with them- and yet he is the softest tackler on our list.
All that said - we have a sample space of one game in 2020 to refer to - hardly proof of anything.
With our current midfield - there are no 'easy' games I dont understand where people get their confidence from tbh.
I want to see Stocker/Kemp/Philps etc pushing for inclusion - Dow/Fisher/LoB and Setterfield have a fair bit to prove.
Tom McDonald seems to turn into a competent footballer when ever he plays against us, rather than a less talented version ofJosh Jenkin that he is against everyone elseMelbournes forward line V our backline is the biggest source of confidence for mine followed by the fact I think ou foward line will present too many challenges for their defence.
Agreed. If Pittonet can stop Gawn from having a BOG performance and we match them in the clearances, we should* be more than right in the mix.Melbournes forward line V our backline is the biggest source of confidence for mine followed by the fact I think ou foward line will present too many challenges for their defence.