JustaBattler
Everyone Looks Better In Blue
- May 31, 2012
- 26,982
- 63,198
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Perhaps have a rethink of how disposal efficiency is measured
Doc (or any other player) takes a 100 kicks that travel 40 metres or more to a 50/50 contest or better (better meaning more to the advantage of a teammate). If the opposition mark the 50/50 ball, or the teammate drops the mark and we don't retain possession, Doc still gets credited with 100% efficiency
Gibbo (who isn't a long kick, but can still kick over 40 metres), takes the same kicks as Doc but they travel 39 metres or less. Whether it is to a 50/50 contest and the opposition mark it, to a teammate in the clear but drops the mark and doesn't retain possession, he receives a disposal efficiency of 0% (A kick under 40 metres must be retained by the intended target to be considered an efficient disposal). Bizarre
And what happened in the 2nd half when we restarted the game from behind? How can you say he padded his stats when the game was in the balance?
If he was padding his stats, what were other players doing
Equal 1st for i50 tackles
Equal 2nd clearances
3rd for pressure
Equal 3rd for contested possessions
Equal 4th tackles
Equal 5th I50
Equal 6th score involvements
C'mon mate - you are talking relative to team performances and a different argument is being made in absolute numbers.