My view on it is who cares.
A lot on here whinge we get two players nominated, the same lot whinge when we get seven and want 10 or 15.
It's a pointless exercise, all it does is once again highlight how many supporters, including a lot of our own, fail to consider the bigger picture and never rate any players outside their own club.
The difference between players 1-10 would be marginal and undoubtedly others would come up with a different pecking order.
Same with players 11-50 - marginal differences.
I rate Grimes higher than most everybody on here - I'm even on record as saying I value him higher than Rance (he's been beaten by his opponent less over the journey and elevated his game to a new level this year), but no way he replaces anyone in that top 10.
A lot on here whinge we get two players nominated, the same lot whinge when we get seven and want 10 or 15.
It's a pointless exercise, all it does is once again highlight how many supporters, including a lot of our own, fail to consider the bigger picture and never rate any players outside their own club.
The difference between players 1-10 would be marginal and undoubtedly others would come up with a different pecking order.
Same with players 11-50 - marginal differences.
I rate Grimes higher than most everybody on here - I'm even on record as saying I value him higher than Rance (he's been beaten by his opponent less over the journey and elevated his game to a new level this year), but no way he replaces anyone in that top 10.