Updated Rolf Harris charges detailed

[Thrawn]

He will most likely be dead before he is released, there's no point giving him anything over 5 years.

Unless you want his corpse sitting in a jail cell?

 

[Donners]

Disgraceful ****ing sentence, feel sorry for the victims who had to endure that trial and for what???

For public vindication by a jury verdict of guilty.

In many ways, that's more powerful than any sentence could be.

 

[worbod]

With all the talk about his awards and honours being rescinded, I wonder whether Moomba will still acknowledge him as one of the Kings of Moomba (1975). In 1999 Zig and Zag were crowned Moomba Monarchs but I believe they were stripped of that title after it was revealed that, years before, Zig had pleaded guilty to child molestation.

Rolf was also named as one of Australia's 100 Entertainers of the Century at the turn of the century. If he is removed from this list I wonder if they replace him with somebody else?

 

[WeetBixKid]

Different perspective:

http://www.libertarianview.co.uk/current-affairs/rolf-harris-beyond-reasonable-doubt

 

[van peebles]

Rolf was also named as one of Australia's 100 Entertainers of the Century at the turn of the century. If he is removed from this list I wonder if they replace him with somebody else?

Im thinking Bill@Boyd to rightly take their place in the top 100.
Although there has been a big push for the Moir sisters.

 

[Silent Alarm]

Meh, the people calling him sick (an a Current Affair buzzword) and wanting effigies to be desecrated and him *******ed are probably the people celebrating arseholes who are committing these things today. It is a different world but this is still going on.

 

[Norwood1878]

Wow. Wishing rape upon people. Classy.

Meh, the people calling him sick (an a Current Affair buzzword) and wanting effigies to be desecrated and him *******ed are probably the people celebrating arseholes who are committing these things today. It is a different world but this is still going on.

 

[rdhopkins2]

1 month and then he gets transferred the Ritz of prisons. Disgusting.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

You're not serious are you?

Yes, yes I am.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Not this shit again

Care to explain this comment?

 

[treeman]

Different perspective:

http://www.libertarianview.co.uk/current-affairs/rolf-harris-beyond-reasonable-doubt

That was an interesting read.

Thanks.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Only half of it in jail. Less than 3 months per kid. ******* disgusting.

How long do you think the sentence should be - taking into consideration that he could only be sentenced according to the laws at the time the offences were committed?

Which of the offences do you believe should have attracted a longer sentence?

 

[Borry]

Meh, the people calling him sick (an a Current Affair buzzword) and wanting effigies to be desecrated and him *******ed are probably the people celebrating arseholes who are committing these things today. It is a different world but this is still going on.

Good point.

The industry he worked in has a lot to answer for for the paedophilic monsters that have been given free reign to do what they want because they are golden geese (Hughes, Harris and a few others)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Catastic82]

How long do you think the sentence should be - taking into consideration that he could only be sentenced according to the laws at the time the offences were committed?

Which of the offences do you believe should have attracted a longer sentence?

Apologist

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Apologist

How does that make me an apologist?

 

[Donners]

How long do you think the sentence should be - taking into consideration that he could only be sentenced according to the laws at the time the offences were committed?

Which of the offences do you believe should have attracted a longer sentence?

Get them to cite legislation, authorities and factors raised in the plea too. I'm sure these opinions are based on careful study of the area, so it shouldn't be too hard.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Apologist

How does that make me an apologist?

So nothing to back it up? Well and truly outed, troll.

 

[Catastic82]

So nothing to back it up? Well and truly outed, troll.

Every thread where a poster has stated that they wish harm on a criminal, you come charging in defending the scum bag rights.

I don't need to defend myself to likes of you.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Every thread where a poster has stated that they wish harm on a criminal, you come charging in defending the scum bag rights.

I don't need to defend myself to likes of you.

So in your view, supporting Australia's (or in this case England's) laws and judicial system makes one an 'apologist' for criminals, what an interesting world view.

I think you are incorrect in your assertion that (in) 'Every thread where a poster has stated that they wish harm on a criminal, you come charging in defending the scum bag rights'. Although if you were correct I would not resile from it. Again, to do so would simply be speaking in support of our laws.

There are a number of places in the world that visit the harm to criminals that you salivate over, if that is the sort of thing you are into, perhaps you could move to one, though I suspect you wouldn't like the reality of it.

If you truly believe that Rolf Harris should be bashed/sexually assaulted/r*ped in prison, which other offenders or offences should this punishment be applied to? I am genuinely interested as to where you would draw the line.

 

[Catastic82]

You're assuming I'm wanting to debate this with you.

I don't

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

You're assuming I'm wanting to debate this with you.

I don't

That's fine and to be honest what I suspected, you can make shock jock style comments but are unable to back them up when pressed.

Anyway, if you do not wish to engage in a debate with me about such matters, which is perfectly fine by me, please refrain from replying to me with posts such as 'not this shit again' and 'apologist'.

 

[Catastic82]

Again the assumptions that I can't back my comments up.

I just don't care about your views and km sure you don't care about mine.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Again the assumptions that I can't back my comments up.

I just don't care about your views and km sure you don't care about mine.

I am actually interested in your views, which is why I asked.

If you don't wish to, or are unable to, back up your comments, that's fine, you can stop replying to my posts.

 

[Oneiros]

Every thread where a poster has stated that they wish harm on a criminal, you come charging in defending the scum bag rights.

I don't need to defend myself to likes of you.

Yes you do, you medieval lunatic.

 

[Borry]

Rape is rape, assault is assault regardless of whoever the victim is.

If a prisoner rapes or bashes a paedophile in prison than they should be convicted and punished the same way as any other offender of such crime would be according to the laws of the land.

If you make exemptions based on who the victim is and whether or not it was deserved, you will just open up a whole can of legal worms. And you will then have future scumbag rapists and assaulted etc. let off without conviction as they will easily engineer valid excuses for their crimes. That would not be pleasant to say the least.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk