I'll wait until North Melbourne make a huge offer for him. It's only then I'll know for sure he's staying.
1.2 million over 4 years got to land that big fish haha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll wait until North Melbourne make a huge offer for him. It's only then I'll know for sure he's staying.
But then he will have to surf in Dangerfields shadowotherwise Danger could use Moggs Creek as a lure, and they'll go surfing together in a suit and tie
You average fewer than 1 post per week and this is the sorta stuff you come out with. Im sure glad you dont post more often. Come back in 9 days and try again champ.God Geelong supporters are ******s
yeah beacause he's UFACarlton are going to throw the kitchen sink at him. And I doubt Adelaide can match.
I can see him giving up 50k per year to stay, but 150-200k per year? Might be too much to give up. No matter how loyal he is. Also need to think about his family and future too.
On SM-N920I using BigFooty.com mobile app
He is, but i think he is the type that will give them the opportunity to match regardless. Seems a loyal type who would stay if the offer is similar.yeah beacause he's UFA
Like I said he's one of the very players, I claim to have connections with. I was right last time, and sure I will be this time too.
Adelaide are going to have to pay close to market rate to keep him though.Like I said he's one of the very players, I claim to have connections with. I was right last time, and sure I will be this time too.
He'll be at Geelong next year mate
We have to play at that hole again?He'll be at Geelong next year mate
No.. didn’t wanna meet the trade demands of the origin club is vastly different to not being able to accommodate the SC.Doubt it couldn't afford to pay for Stringer or Watts
We need to keep that spare to sign guys to 400K contracts who barely play for us.Surely Adelaide have plenty of money in their cap post Dangerfield and Lever?
yeah beacause he's UFA
yes he is ...no he is not
He would have been RFA but the new cba agreement he is now an UFA.
He would have been RFA but the new cba agreement he is now an UFA.
Well yeah but that's what happened with the RA rules in the first place.they changed the rules retrospectively?
The way Tex goes on he must be on 200 a year and donates half back to the club to buy training equipment.Surely Adelaide have plenty of money in their cap post Dangerfield and Lever?
No he's not ...you're wrong buddy.