I'm a fan but Jimmy's lost a yard of pace and is on the downhill, and l hope Leo is given opportunity to take the spot.I think J.Web will do quite well under Lyon's watch. Think we might see the best of him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a fan but Jimmy's lost a yard of pace and is on the downhill, and l hope Leo is given opportunity to take the spot.I think J.Web will do quite well under Lyon's watch. Think we might see the best of him.
My back 6:I'm a fan but Jimmy's lost a yard of pace and is on the downhill, and l hope Leo is given opportunity to take the spot.
I can't see it happening. Cordy will be there somewhere and Sincs will probably become a mid.My back 6:
Paton-Howard-Wilkie
Coffield-Battle-Sinclair
hopefully Sincs is at least tried as a full time midMy back 6:
Paton-Howard-Wilkie
Coffield-Battle-Sinclair
I was thinking Battle fwd but we will already have King/Skunk/Hayes IMOI can't see it happening. Cordy will be there somewhere and Sincs will probably become a mid.
+1.hopefully Sincs is at least tried as a full time mid
Its the knock on effect that makes things interesting. Sinclair goes to the midfield then who fills that spot??+1.
He would add a different dynamic to our midfield - Jones will be back to his best hopefully aswell
Sinclair into the midfield would be a waste. He was the best half back in the comp this year. Whoever replaces in at half back is a much bigger downgrade than who he would replace in the midfield rotation. Especially if we want to give some younger players more midfield time.Its the knock on effect that makes things interesting. Sinclair goes to the midfield then who fills that spot??
DMac, Webster, McKenna ???? at half back.
That still leaves you with Steele, Gresham, Ross, Crouch, Jones, Sinclair, Windy, Owens, Clark as viable midfield options. Might explain why Hunter Clark to North was given a chance to see what might eventuate.
Less of an issue if we don't pick up McKenna.
I'd rather Sinclair be the 16th best mid whilst we play finals.Sinclair into the midfield would be a waste. He was the best half back in the comp this year. Whoever replaces in at half back is a much bigger downgrade than who he would replace in the midfield rotation. Especially if we want to give some younger players more midfield time.
Best way to play finals is having your best players in their best positions. And having the strongest best 22 possible.I'd rather Sinclair be the 16th best mid whilst we play finals.
Agree, Sincs is absolutely elite at what he does.Sinclair into the midfield would be a waste. He was the best half back in the comp this year. Whoever replaces in at half back is a much bigger downgrade than who he would replace in the midfield rotation. Especially if we want to give some younger players more midfield time.
Maybe read what I wrote, we stuffed up Billings and McCartin in 2013 and 2014.How was the draft compromised in 2013+14? All the compromises drafts were from 2009-2011. Unfortunately we don’t have compromised drafts as an excuse.
Sinclair to the mids, Hill to the wingSinclair into the midfield would be a waste. He was the best half back in the comp this year. Whoever replaces in at half back is a much bigger downgrade than who he would replace in the midfield rotation. Especially if we want to give some younger players more midfield time.
RTB wants run.Sincs into the mids mix is a must and I'm sure that's what we'll see
You said we bottomed out right as the compromised drafts began which is wrong. We didn’t bottom out until 2013 when the compromised drafts were finished. So again, we don’t have the compromised drafts as an excuse for anything. You can’t just make things up to suit your narrative.Maybe read what I wrote, we stuffed up Billings and McCartin in 2013 and 2014.
GWS had 10 picks before us in 2011, we didn't have a pick until pick 20 after crashing out of the finals we were done. We chose Saad and Milera and 25 for 20 we got Seb Ross for 25 while GWS got Paton, Coniglio, Tyson, Hoskin-Elliott, Buntine, Hayes, Tomlinson, Toby greene and Taylor Adams before we got Ross.
Nah, no effect on a team that bottomed out at all. Also said we wasted capital we got for Dal, McEvoy and Goddard.
Does help to comprehend what someone has posted
You said we bottomed out right as the compromised drafts began which is wrong. We didn’t bottom out until 2013 when the compromised drafts were finished. So again, we don’t have the compromised drafts as an excuse for anything. You can’t just make things up to suit your narrative.
I'd say that the general rule to which exceptions can apply.Best way to play finals is having your best players in their best positions. And having the strongest best 22 possible.
Sinclair's best position is half back. And our midfield options without Sinclair are a lot stronger than our half-back options without Sinclair.
McKenna is coming?Sinclair to the mids, Hill to the wing
Cordy Howard Wilkie
Coffield Battle McKenna
McKenna will give us lots of run, Coffield intercept mark. If they can't cut it we have Highmore, Webster, Sharman as the intercept mark.
That backline is far too tall and devoid of run. Would be a step backwards.Sinclair to the mids, Hill to the wing
Cordy Howard Wilkie
Coffield Battle McKenna
McKenna will give us lots of run, Coffield intercept mark. If they can't cut it we have Highmore, Webster, Sharman as the intercept mark.
That looks more like the kind of back line I want..Sinclair to the mids, Hill to the wing
Cordy Howard Wilkie
Coffield Battle McKenna
McKenna will give us lots of run, Coffield intercept mark. If they can't cut it we have Highmore, Webster, Sharman as the intercept mark.
Are they though?Best way to play finals is having your best players in their best positions. And having the strongest best 22 possible.
Sinclair's best position is half back. And our midfield options without Sinclair are a lot stronger than our half-back options without Sinclair.