List Mgmt. Ross the Boss

poshman

Club Legend
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Posts
2,168
Likes
2,200
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
CFC, San Antonio Spurs
This is all good and well and I agree with the defence being our standout area - but it is evidently not showing in results or performance which is what everything needs to be measured by. At this rate, we will be lucky to be fighting for a top 8 position by 2020. Not a premiership which was the goal in this rebuild.

Mundy will be gone in a year or so and has been one of our best this year. S Hill doesn't look like he has too much left in him. Logue looks like a blunder of a top 10 pick and based on evidence, McCarthy is a fail. We could have had Taranto instead.

We are slightly ahead of Carlton, Dogs, Saints & Gold Coast in the rebuild stage, significantly behind Brisbane though. If some supporters are happy with that, then so be it.

Lyon and our awful drafting has put us in this spot, I don't see us getting back to the top anytime soon.
You said there had been 'no progress' and I simply pointed out some clear areas of progress.

S Hill will play for another 5 years easily. As for Logue being a 'blunder' that is a worse statement than 'we have made no progress'

How anyone can rate Logue anything other than extremely positively and high potential after his first season is beyond me. He is huge, very fast and showed towards the end of his first season that he could play. Add him to Pearce, Hamling, Ryan, and Wilson and we have some weapons. He showed an ability to stay in the contest, keep his feet and strength that I thought was great for the first year. Wait until we see him after his second full pre-season. We should all be full of hope on him and the trade down that included Cam was a good one at the time.

I don't think we can judge Cam until he plays in a stable forward line with a decent midfield in front of him. He was our leading goal kicker last year and is in obvious need to can some fitness. We judge him over the next 12-18 months. Even if he is not playing then, the trade was a good one to make at the time and that doesn't change based on results. Much like the Bennell deal was a good one at the time.

I am not happy with our position on the ladder, though I thought it was expected and from memory didn't most posters here say we would finish between 12th and 15th? If we have moved ahead of those clubs in our rebuild despite them starting their rebuild two years or more prior we have achieved something. Dare I say progress?

Personally, I don't want us to finish higher than we are now. Pick six is handy and I thought we would finish with pick 4 or 5. GCS and Carlton have been historically poor.

Our awful drafting was from 2011-2013. (And now we could say 15 wasn't good either) Although Neale came during that time. And Apeness - Pearce and Tabener picked in 13 draft. 2012 = Simpson - Tanner and Duffy... Vomit! We effectively got four players out of that time.

Blakely - Langdon - Weller - Tucker - Logue - Cox - Darcy - Brayshaw - Cerra - Banfield - Ryan

Add to that - Hamling - Wilson and Brad Hill (all traded for picks) and I would say we have had a robust three years.

Pretty handy last few drafts don't you think?

Our biggest error was not seeing how shite our foot soldiers were in 2014 and trading them out then. However, even in 2015, I was calling for that and most here were shouting that down. Anyway - to say there has been 'no progress' and Logue is a 'bust' and we aren't getting anywhere is simply false.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

go_the_dockers

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Posts
8,700
Likes
5,266
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Man Utd
Our biggest error was not seeing how shite our foot soldiers were in 2014 and trading them out then. However, even in 2015, I was calling for that and most here were shouting that down. Anyway - to say there has been 'no progress' and Logue is a 'bust' and we aren't getting anywhere is simply false.
If Fyfe did not get injured we were probably in a GF. Trading them out would have cost us that chance.
 

Purpletown

All Australian
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Posts
925
Likes
1,539
Location
Restumping
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SFFC Denver Broncos
Tabs and Cox are tracking pretty well of course but I don't think it should be ignored that for both their main attribute is contested marking.

Helps a lot that if in a perennially disappointing forward line that frequently has no real structure beyond long bombs you're main strength is an ability to mark those long bombs...


Jeremy McGovern will set a new record for intercept marks this weekend unless we do something different than our "Bomb it Long" MO for the past 3 years.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Posts
4,774
Likes
15,917
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
TGO, South Fremantle, Hajduk Split
"We're on a journey and we're working really hard

I urge you to stick with us, we're going to have some ups and downs but the real enjoyment comes out of jumping on, doing the hard yards and seeing the growth in our young players. That's where the enjoyment comes from.

We see you as apart of our community, the unconditional support we can't do without and we rely on you enormously. Stick with us, we're working incredibly hard.

We see great possibility. We talked to the players about taking the emotional risk to commit yourself and dedicate yourself with no guarantee - because it gives you your best chance but if you don't take that emotional risk you have no chance.

At the minute we're opening ourselves up, we're doing the work and we're starting to see the wheel turn slowly but surely. So get behind us, there will be some great times there will be some tough times.

Thank you, stick with us."
Sorry mate, but the only thing you are highlighting here is your naivety.
 

Frigate

Club Legend
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Posts
2,120
Likes
1,241
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Liverpool
My two cents.

I do not care who is coaching what team, but if players make skill errors repeatedly, then you can have the best game plan in the world and it will not change a thing.

All the signs of a young team are there. Inconsistent. When the tail is up we are convincing at times, and good enough to win some matches. When we are down the confidence drops off quickly.
This time last year, this game would have been a 100 point blow out. They stemmed the flow and it really should have been closer to a 40 point margin with some woeful misses. In my opinion it was not a disaster. It was just a solid beating.

So we play Johnson, Ballantyne and throw in Pearce and the margin is probably around 30 points. Then the questions about youth come in. It is very rare that young teams win consistently. So who here honestly believes we are capable of winning consistently when our Peel team cannot win a game. People need to get real and look at the team we are playing. This year is dusted, and all we can do is get games into players.

Any game plan looks crap when you can not hit a target. Cox is in struggle town as McCarthy has been, as any forward has been, apart from when we are winning which is not often. I think the clearance count was 9-1 in the first half. This is simply a lack of an experienced ruck.

Anyway, they made us look silly, but as they always do - they hit target after target.

Finally, would I change some things - yeah I remember us over committing to the player with the ball. They always had an out and they waited perfectly for that option. I think this is definitely inexperience, and really they needed to stick with their player, but I guess that is the learning of AFL.

This season has been a nightmare. From Fyfe to the Hill brothers, to Bennell, to Taberner (who is our main fey forward hope), to Blakely who was perhaps our runner up Doig medalist, to Darcy - it has been a terrible injury ridden year. Most of us hoped for 7 or 8th - that was without the injuries. Bennell was going to play round 1. He is that good. He can even play full forward. But he is now an if and a week to week. Hindsight is great, I wanted to get him, we got him, I am still happy we have him.

I am probably more optimistic about our list than most. I just find it funny that some think a coach would miraculously get young players to make the right decisions and skill under pressure. If it was an old list, I accept that, but that ain't so. We are playing a half WAFL team in the AFL. That is a fact.

Is Beveridge a good coach? He was coach of the century for one year.
Hardwick was about to be fired if there was one more loss, before they went on their incredible run.
Fans were calling for Simpson at the end of last season.
Pyke is getting the axe apparently.
Worsfold was the problem at Essendon, then they start winning again playing exciting footy.
Hinkley - are Port going places?
Buckley??? he was gone numerous times.

I think Ross is our best chance of going to a premiership. I am still on board.
 

Rion

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Posts
1,586
Likes
2,161
AFL Club
Fremantle
For the pro-camp if we are solely blaming youth for our losses right now how do we explain 2016? For that year we consistently sent out the oldest team in the league and got thumped. I mean we had a 10 game losing streak with a team that was nearly 26 on average. That team was pretty much exactly the same as the prelim team the year before.

I just don't get how he's still seen as this 'super-coach' when every sign from the last three years points otherwise. Now maybe we can brandish some excuses here that gets him off the hook a little (and I think there's definitely some valid ones there) but I certainly don't think you can paint his coaching efforts for awhile now in any sort of positive light and that has to have some valid questions that come with it.
 

FreoMonocle

Premium Gold
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Posts
1,725
Likes
3,195
AFL Club
Fremantle
For the pro-camp if we are solely blaming youth for our losses right now how do we explain 2016? For that year we consistently sent out the oldest team in the league and got thumped. I mean we had a 10 game losing streak with a team that was nearly 26 on average. That team was pretty much exactly the same as the prelim team the year before.

I just don't get how he's still seen as this 'super-coach' when every sign from the last three years points otherwise. Now maybe we can brandish some excuses here that gets him off the hook a little (and I think there's definitely some valid ones there) but I certainly don't think you can paint his coaching efforts for awhile now in any sort of positive light and that has to have some valid questions that come with it.
Clarkson has not had a list capable for the last few years, ipso facto he has spent time out of the 8 - even though he is "Supercoach".

So people would be disingenuous to think that Fremantle's current team could possibly have a crack at a flag right now if only it had another coach, the list is too inexperienced and not capable of it at this point in time. Supercoach - whoever it is, can only use the cattle at hand.

Right now, we are paying the price for not having developed quality players from 2006 and on - Where are those 24 to 30 years olds that should be in the prime of their careers and the backbone of this list? We have young fellows and vintage fellows and not enough in between, even the mighty Clarkson could do stuff all with this list as it stands, it is not a balanced list.

So, methinks Ross is doing well enough with the list we have right now - I'm fine with his part in the list degrading, in that, we did well and had poor picks as a consequence. He was handed a list with lot's of missing pieces and we still suffer from that legacy. It's a list managers issue that is missing basically, everyone in our drafting that is older than Apeness/APearce, with only a handful of players right up until you get to the "ancient" players (slightly fixed by recent trading).
 

Dormammu

Club Legend
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Posts
2,876
Likes
949
Location
Out of sight, out of mind
AFL Club
Fremantle
For the pro-camp if we are solely blaming youth for our losses right now how do we explain 2016?
That was the year the AFL set its sights on smashing congestion-based game plans, of which Fremantle was the leading proponent. For example, the 10 metre "no-go" zone rule introduced that year rewarded teams such as Footscray (eventual premiers) that chose to quickly play-on had lots of leg speed and highly skilled ball users.

In contrast, Fremantle had the strongest, but slowest team in the competition (Barlow, Mzungu, Dawson, Griffin, Mundy, 211, Pav, Fishpub, Ibbo, etc) with hardly any players with consistently high disposal efficiency (Mundy, Walters and Shill are all I can think of).
 

eastfreo75

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Posts
5,925
Likes
4,369
Location
pakenham
AFL Club
Fremantle
Ross only plays defenders so how can anyone kick goals, weve averaged 10 goals a season under Ross the Toss, most Premiership teams are averaging 14+ goals per game so make of that what you will
Totally agree. We need 4 goals more per game and at the same time reduce goals against by another 4 goals.

That's a total of 8 goals per game turnaround. We are a very long way of top 4. By the way, we need to replace the influence of Mundy and Sandilands at the same time.

On the current rate of improvement with Mundy and Sandilands we still don't make the finals next year and without them we most likely be in the bottom 6.

If we aren't in the finals for 4 straight years, surely Ross should be under pressure to keep his job.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Square Peg

Club Legend
Joined
Jul 20, 2014
Posts
2,817
Likes
5,630
Location
Fremantle WA
AFL Club
Fremantle
Clarkson has not had a list capable for the last few years, ipso facto he has spent time out of the 8 - even though he is "Supercoach".

So people would be disingenuous to think that Fremantle's current team could possibly have a crack at a flag right now if only it had another coach, the list is too inexperienced and not capable of it at this point in time. Supercoach - whoever it is, can only use the cattle at hand.

Right now, we are paying the price for not having developed quality players from 2006 and on - Where are those 24 to 30 years olds that should be in the prime of their careers and the backbone of this list? We have young fellows and vintage fellows and not enough in between, even the mighty Clarkson could do stuff all with this list as it stands, it is not a balanced list.

So, methinks Ross is doing well enough with the list we have right now - I'm fine with his part in the list degrading, in that, we did well and had poor picks as a consequence. He was handed a list with lot's of missing pieces and we still suffer from that legacy. It's a list managers issue that is missing basically, everyone in our drafting that is older than Apeness/APearce, with only a handful of players right up until you get to the "ancient" players (slightly fixed by recent trading).
This is pretty much all true and a good summary of why we arent contenders for a flag. Which is fine, but I don't see anyone saying we should be. There is plenty of legit criticism of the coach that has nothing to do with not being contenders in 2018

Sent from my TA-1024 using Tapatalk
 

Rion

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Posts
1,586
Likes
2,161
AFL Club
Fremantle
Clarkson has not had a list capable for the last few years, ipso facto he has spent time out of the 8 - even though he is "Supercoach".

So people would be disingenuous to think that Fremantle's current team could possibly have a crack at a flag right now if only it had another coach, the list is too inexperienced and not capable of it at this point in time. Supercoach - whoever it is, can only use the cattle at hand.

Right now, we are paying the price for not having developed quality players from 2006 and on - Where are those 24 to 30 years olds that should be in the prime of their careers and the backbone of this list? We have young fellows and vintage fellows and not enough in between, even the mighty Clarkson could do stuff all with this list as it stands, it is not a balanced list.

So, methinks Ross is doing well enough with the list we have right now - I'm fine with his part in the list degrading, in that, we did well and had poor picks as a consequence. He was handed a list with lot's of missing pieces and we still suffer from that legacy. It's a list managers issue that is missing basically, everyone in our drafting that is older than Apeness/APearce, with only a handful of players right up until you get to the "ancient" players (slightly fixed by recent trading).
You might be missing my point there. I also agree the current list isn't going to be challenging regardless of the coach. I disagree on giving him an out about his massive part in the degradation but that's just my opinion.

I just believe that there's been massive flaws to his coaching for the last 3 years (and as far back as 2013 really) and yet there's a view on here that we don't need to think about replacing him or bringing in experienced assistants that'll challenge him because he's at the top of his game and very few are better.

That was the year the AFL set its sights on smashing congestion-based game plans, of which Fremantle was the leading proponent. For example, the 10 metre "no-go" zone rule introduced that year rewarded teams such as Footscray (eventual premiers) that chose to quickly play-on had lots of leg speed and highly skilled ball users.

In contrast, Fremantle had the strongest, but slowest team in the competition (Barlow, Mzungu, Dawson, Griffin, Mundy, 211, Pav, Fishpub, Ibbo, etc) with hardly any players with consistently high disposal efficiency (Mundy, Walters and Shill are all I can think of).
I think the rule change's were highly overblown personally but like I said they'd be excuses for his performance. But nevertheless surely you've got to question a coach that is completely unable to deal with changes he knew were coming. The league is only going to continue to push changes that reduce congestion and increase attacking and Ross has shown (so far at least) that he's got no clue how to deal with them.
 

salim malik

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Posts
11,999
Likes
23,869
Location
Paradise on Earth.
AFL Club
Fremantle
Clarkson has one of , if not the oldest and most experienced lists in the comp and the Hawks are struggling to make the eight. Is the Hawks season a fail with their squad and has Clarkson reached his use by date. This spin that the Hawks are rebuilding is bulltish.
 

Dormammu

Club Legend
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Posts
2,876
Likes
949
Location
Out of sight, out of mind
AFL Club
Fremantle
I think the rule change's were highly overblown personally but like I said they'd be excuses for his performance. But nevertheless surely you've got to question a coach that is completely unable to deal with changes he knew were coming. The league is only going to continue to push changes that reduce congestion and increase attacking and Ross has shown (so far at least) that he's got no clue how to deal with them.
Important to note that there were other changes made, such as quicker re-starts at stoppages and harsher interpretation of holding the man at stoppages. And, ironically, Lyon was called in by the AFL to help create the "no-go zone" rule.

Yes, the club was unable to deal with these changes because they were so far-reaching. Sydney had a similar game-plan but were saved by their academy (e.g., Heeney and Mills) and having the best forward of the modern era. For us, adapting to such fundamental rule changes (driven by the unholy cabal of the AFL and Channel Slime's desire for higher ratings/profits) can only be achieved by turning over the list and that takes years.
 

StingBitten

Premiership Player
Joined
May 31, 2012
Posts
4,825
Likes
6,896
Location
Bayswater
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Saffa's
Outside of coaching, look at each section of the field.

Personnel wise in defence we’ve got A. Pearce, Hamling, Ryan and Wilson plus rotating half-backs in Hill, Blakely etc.
Logue, Nyhuis, Hughes, Kersten, Duman as handy back ups.

There’s a lot of potential there.

In the ruck we’ve found our LTR in Darcy, and have Strnadica, Apeness, Jones and Meek developing. That’s not our issue either.

Fyfe, Mundy, Neale, B. Hill, S. Hill, Langdon, Blakely, as prime midfielders

Cerra, Brayshaw, Bennell, Giro, Banfield with huge potential. There’s holes there but that’s probably not the issue either.

Forward line:

McCarthy (failed to fire)
Kersten (Failed as a fwd and sent to defence)
Ballantyne (completely past it)
Cox (still young and developing)
Taberner (still developing)
Apeness (will be ever strong games together?)
Matera (failed to fire)

Walters is our only proven performer and he’s out of form.

That’s a disastrous forward line. Three recent recruits who so far have failed to deliver, injury setbacks to two key forwards, a small forward who’s completely past it and a 19 year old still trying to find his feet.

Fix the forward issues you fix the team. Move Ballantyne on and draft a small forward like Ian Hill, given Cox and Taberner more exposure, move Apeness on if he can’t stay fit and move Kersten on regardless. Need to invest more time in Cam Mac to help him reach his potential
 

malpaso

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Posts
6,614
Likes
3,568
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls, Kansas City Royals
Also a fair assertion - we had a very successful period from 2012 - 2015. And I think we are reloading quite quickly.
Totally agree. Such a fickle bunch AFL fans, ourselves as a club were starved for some form of success which we did achieve in that period. Our latest drafts are looking good after picks that didn't pan out and/or unlucky injury curses.
Very important off-season this one both for incoming players and in particular our current crop of tall forwards.
 

Moo

Premium Platinum
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Posts
29,871
Likes
20,929
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Newcastle Utd
Outside of coaching, look at each section of the field.

Personnel wise in defence we’ve got A. Pearce, Hamling, Ryan and Wilson plus rotating half-backs in Hill, Blakely etc.
Logue, Nyhuis, Hughes, Kersten, Duman as handy back ups.

There’s a lot of potential there.

In the ruck we’ve found our LTR in Darcy, and have Strnadica, Apeness, Jones and Meek developing. That’s not our issue either.

Fyfe, Mundy, Neale, B. Hill, S. Hill, Langdon, Blakely, as prime midfielders

Cerra, Brayshaw, Bennell, Giro, Banfield with huge potential. There’s holes there but that’s probably not the issue either.

Forward line:

McCarthy (failed to fire)
Kersten (Failed as a fwd and sent to defence)
Ballantyne (completely past it)
Cox (still young and developing)
Taberner (still developing)
Apeness (will be ever strong games together?)
Matera (failed to fire)

Walters is our only proven performer and he’s out of form.

That’s a disastrous forward line. Three recent recruits who so far have failed to deliver, injury setbacks to two key forwards, a small forward who’s completely past it and a 19 year old still trying to find his feet.

Fix the forward issues you fix the team. Move Ballantyne on and draft a small forward like Ian Hill, given Cox and Taberner more exposure, move Apeness on if he can’t stay fit and move Kersten on regardless. Need to invest more time in Cam Mac to help him reach his potential
Ross's game plan requires a legendary forward capable of multiple re-leads, strong enough to out mark or bring to the ground the ball against 2 players and still give you 2 goals a game.

Ross either puts Fyfe forward, keeps him there and strengthens the midfield or otherwise we get a King wait & hope.

The Eagles will play 1 back and kill us ...McGov & Hurn will switch & rebound. Our 1 back will end up bombing it down the line (hello McGovern & Hurn) or we will try and switch and our skills will result in a turn over.
 

Nodgey

Club Legend
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Posts
2,825
Likes
1,963
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
SDFC, Liverpool, Scorchers
Totally agree. Such a fickle bunch AFL fans, ourselves as a club were starved for some form of success which we did achieve in that period. Our latest drafts are looking good after picks that didn't pan out and/or unlucky injury curses.
Very important off-season this one both for incoming players and in particular our current crop of tall forwards.
The club did bang on about 'sustained success' though. That period, whilst enjoyable for a success-starved Freo fan, does not match my definition nor expectation of 'sustained'.
 

blue shark

Club Legend
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Posts
2,565
Likes
1,640
Location
perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Keep Lyon until the end of his contract and see where we are then
Even if he does get us close to the eight by then, is he our first premiership coach, I don't think so not on his own accord.
We need better systems now, especially with the talent at the club, and less injuries something that has plagued the club
for too long.
I don't think we lead the AFL in anything even with spending millions at Cockburn.
 

Admiral Byng

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
18,574
Likes
14,209
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Perth Scorchers
Outside of coaching, look at each section of the field.

Personnel wise in defence we’ve got A. Pearce, Hamling, Ryan and Wilson plus rotating half-backs in Hill, Blakely etc.
Logue, Nyhuis, Hughes, Kersten, Duman as handy back ups.

There’s a lot of potential there.

In the ruck we’ve found our LTR in Darcy, and have Strnadica, Apeness, Jones and Meek developing. That’s not our issue either.

Fyfe, Mundy, Neale, B. Hill, S. Hill, Langdon, Blakely, as prime midfielders

Cerra, Brayshaw, Bennell, Giro, Banfield with huge potential. There’s holes there but that’s probably not the issue either.

Forward line:

McCarthy (failed to fire)
Kersten (Failed as a fwd and sent to defence)
Ballantyne (completely past it)
Cox (still young and developing)
Taberner (still developing)
Apeness (will be ever strong games together?)
Matera (failed to fire)

Walters is our only proven performer and he’s out of form.

That’s a disastrous forward line. Three recent recruits who so far have failed to deliver, injury setbacks to two key forwards, a small forward who’s completely past it and a 19 year old still trying to find his feet.

Fix the forward issues you fix the team. Move Ballantyne on and draft a small forward like Ian Hill, given Cox and Taberner more exposure, move Apeness on if he can’t stay fit and move Kersten on regardless. Need to invest more time in Cam Mac to help him reach his potential
You're dreaming if you think our forward problems are down to personnel.

We have two forward strategies. First is push everyone back and hope the mids or defenders can create a turnover - if they do - try and get a man loose out the back and beat the opposition back to goal.

Failing that our second strategy is to bring the ball to ground deep inside forward 50, concede possession to the defenders through unequal numbers but then try to win a HTB free kick as they attempt to transition the ball out of defence.

The second tactic is by far the least effective possible strategy there is, but that is really what Ross Lyon football boils down to. Nothing is going to change much regardless of who we play there. It is not the forwards we have recruited that have failed, it is the way we make them play. McCarthy, Matera ad Kersten would be much more effective in a traditional forward set-up.

Plus the umps hate us and never pay us free kicks in front of goal anyway.
 

Rion

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Posts
1,586
Likes
2,161
AFL Club
Fremantle
Important to note that there were other changes made, such as quicker re-starts at stoppages and harsher interpretation of holding the man at stoppages. And, ironically, Lyon was called in by the AFL to help create the "no-go zone" rule.

Yes, the club was unable to deal with these changes because they were so far-reaching. Sydney had a similar game-plan but were saved by their academy (e.g., Heeney and Mills) and having the best forward of the modern era. For us, adapting to such fundamental rule changes (driven by the unholy cabal of the AFL and Channel Slime's desire for higher ratings/profits) can only be achieved by turning over the list and that takes years.
I don't buy that the game really changed much between 2015 and 2016. There were certainly no fundamental changes (or we wouldn't be having the 'ugly football' discussion now). Congestion was still a major factor. Sydney came first and WB won the premiership based off a game-plan that focused on contested football and generating pressure around the contest.

I think you skirt over the Sydney example too easily. Mills and Heeney are quality talents but they were just first year and second year players playing half-back and half-forward in that year. I don't think Blakely and Weller at the time for example were that far off them. Buddy of course is a factor but do you really think that one guy is the difference between the team that finished first and the team that finished 3rd last...
 

poshman

Club Legend
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Posts
2,168
Likes
2,200
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
CFC, San Antonio Spurs
The club did bang on about 'sustained success' though. That period, whilst enjoyable for a success-starved Freo fan, does not match my definition nor expectation of 'sustained'.
I haven't found many willing to look into my posts on here and argue with well-founded reason.

The question that has to be asked to your statement is: What is your definition of sustained success?

Not many clubs have managed to be in the finals, play prelims, minor premier and grand final appearance. I would also argue that had RTB been here earlier we would have played finals for longer.

Do you think with the current rebuild we are positioning ourselves for sustained success?
 

Rion

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Posts
1,586
Likes
2,161
AFL Club
Fremantle
I haven't found many willing to look into my posts on here and argue with well-founded reason.

The question that has to be asked to your statement is: What is your definition of sustained success?

Not many clubs have managed to be in the finals, play prelims, minor premier and grand final appearance. I would also argue that had RTB been here earlier we would have played finals for longer.

Do you think with the current rebuild we are positioning ourselves for sustained success?
A 4 year period where we make finals before a 4-5 year (we hope) complete rebuild certainly isn't sustained success... In the current AFL it simply isn't good enough when you compare it to the better teams.

I agree that eventually Hawthorn, WC, Geelong, Sydney etc will have to dip down but it will without a doubt not be to the same length of time we've already spent down here, let alone the time we may still have to go before we're back. Hawthorn did one rebuild and have sustained over 10 years of consistent competitiveness out of it and who knows if they have the capacity to do a Collingwood esque soft rebuild (where the team hangs around mid-table) and challenge again without falling too hard down the ditch like us.

WC have only had 4 seasons below 10 wins in 17 years and haven't dropped below 9 wins in 8 years. In Ross' 7 year tenure we'll already have 3 after this year.

I don't think building for sustained success has got anything to do with how you rebuild. The challenge comes every single year you're contending to continue to refresh and rejuvenate the team which despite promises otherwise we completely and utterly failed at.
 
Top Bottom