I think we would be too top heavy with Warnock, Garland and Rivers all in the backline. It may seem silly given we usually have Frawley, Garland and Rivers, but Frawley has the ability to run and create a lot more than Warnock.
I'd like to see us go with:
Bartram - Garland - MacDonald
Grimes - Rivers - Bail
This gives us two natural talls in Garland and Rivers, two medium-talls in Grimes and MacDonald and two smalls in Bartram and Bail (or another running option). The reason for this is because a lot of teams this season will focus on forward pressure (Collingwood/St Kilda style), so it is vital that we have guys that can run and break the zone from defence. We saw last night how we often struggled to break through Adelaide's zone, so imagine if we didn't have the run of a Bail or Bennell because someone like Warnock was taking their spot.
If we stick with Martin as our "mobile" back-up ruckman, he can also double up as a key defender should something go wrong (injury, mismatch, etc...)
I'd like to see us go with:
Bartram - Garland - MacDonald
Grimes - Rivers - Bail
This gives us two natural talls in Garland and Rivers, two medium-talls in Grimes and MacDonald and two smalls in Bartram and Bail (or another running option). The reason for this is because a lot of teams this season will focus on forward pressure (Collingwood/St Kilda style), so it is vital that we have guys that can run and break the zone from defence. We saw last night how we often struggled to break through Adelaide's zone, so imagine if we didn't have the run of a Bail or Bennell because someone like Warnock was taking their spot.
If we stick with Martin as our "mobile" back-up ruckman, he can also double up as a key defender should something go wrong (injury, mismatch, etc...)






