- May 18, 2016
- 13,030
- 24,903
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Me too. My first thoughts were he had broken something.Yeah - you'd think he'd be OK provided it isn't fractured or broken as well.
Very relieved it's only a finger to be honest..................
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Me too. My first thoughts were he had broken something.Yeah - you'd think he'd be OK provided it isn't fractured or broken as well.
Very relieved it's only a finger to be honest..................
Fair enough. But that was a year ago.With respect Max watch the first game v Tigers last season
Tigers isolated Zuthries and his opponent at HFF and played through them for 3-4 entries in a short space of time - Zuthrie battled hard but lost each one on one. Great coaching by Hardwick.
I am a wrap for Zuthrie as he kid can play but he does need work on his core strength - which will come with another few preseasons
Zuthrie on Roughead?Just go back and watch any game he has played. Mackie was leaps and bounds ahead of Zuth in terms of smarts. 3 inches taller and longer limbed too. He was smart enough to not need to be big. I don't have the same thoughts on Zac, cause he is still way smaller than even Mackie was and doesn't have the smarts. It's not a massive issue, it won't be the end of him if he doesn't get bigger and stronger, but he needs some more beef to be a more effective player.
In a one on one vs Roughhead i know i'd rather have mackie defending than Zuth. Might not be strong enough to engage in wrestling but mack was 6 ft 4 and had long arms to get a spoil.
In all fairness to Zuth I don't recall much of Mackies early years, just the middle to late years of his career where he was a very experienced player that Zuth hasn't had the chance to be yet.
GAGFDJWHJSKSHDKllH
That would be an unbelievable return.
If we get 20 goals out of Ablett it's a pass. He's not the same player, and much older than when his father moved to forward full time.
It's overblown, like many things that get repeated over and over.
It's the same thing was said of Mackie for years and years.
Show me the instances where he has been "continually pushed off the ball".
There must be plenty to choose from?
I wasn't meaning to compare Mackie and Zuthrie for any other purpose than both have been constantly described as under-developed body wise.Mackie was an elite kick as well as being taller.
Zuthrie can read the play thats about it.
An undersized guy like Zuthrie is going to get exploited 1 on 1, he needs to get bigger and/or be elite at other things to make up for it.
We don't have one competent ruck, and the Premiership team showed the way last year in taking 2 rucks in.
Taking a Stanley, who is injury prone, or a Smith (out of favor), Fort (untested) or Abbott (relatively untested) on their own into a match with just Sav as back up is suicide.
Abbott can mark and kick goals. Stanley isn't completely useless forward. I would be taking both into matches, especially round 1 V Grundy where we need two guys to wear him into the ground, would be the better strategy.
If we had a Gawn or a NicNat or a Grundy you could take one in. We don't have that.
Geez, and here's me thinking he'll kick 50-70 if cemented in the forward line.
I'd be upset if he doesn't kick 20 by Easter Monday.
Degoey is fit isn't he
Me too. My first thoughts were he had broken something.
We don't have one competent ruck, and the Premiership team showed the way last year in taking 2 rucks in.
Taking a Stanley, who is injury prone, or a Smith (out of favor), Fort (untested) or Abbott (relatively untested) on their own into a match with just Sav as back up is suicide.
Abbott can mark and kick goals. Stanley isn't completely useless forward. I would be taking both into matches, especially round 1 V Grundy where we need two guys to wear him into the ground, would be the better strategy.
If we had a Gawn or a NicNat or a Grundy you could take one in. We don't have that.
Thats dissapointing if true. He’s done nothing to warrant an immediate walk up. Constable would be ahead of him imo.Mention of SS being a certain starter next Friday v Pies after no JLT.
Must be highly respected.
No Constable? Not likely ... but it’s a good team you’ve namedMy guess
B: Jordan Clark - Mark Blicavs - Jack Henry
HB: Tom Stewart - Jake Kolodjashnij - Mark O'Connor
C: Cam Guthrie - Joel Selwood - Mitch Duncan
HF: Brandon Parfitt - Esava Ratagolea - Gary Rohan
F: Gary Ablett - Tom Hawkins - Luke Dahlhaus
R: Rhys Stanley - Patrick Dangerfield - Tim Kelly
I: Zach Guthrie - Harry Taylor - Sam Menegola - Tom Atkins
Personally I wouldn't pick Cam Guthrie, Taylor or Rohan, but I think they'll all play.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think they'll force all of JK, Blitz, Taylor, Hendo and Henry into our backline, although it wouldn't surprise.
No Constable? Not likely ... but it’s a good team you’ve named
This talk of blokes like Scooter and Zuthrie getting starts is concerning. Tried and unproven, yet we have kids like Constable and Atkins waiting in the wings. Lets hope its only talk... otherwise, not much has changedI'd pick him, but just think they'll lean towards Zach Guthrie.
Scott still thinks he owes the Guthrie's something for getting Blicavs to the club.This talk of blokes like Scooter and Zuthrie getting starts is concerning. Tried and unproven, yet we have kids like Constable and Atkins waiting in the wings. Lets hope its only talk... otherwise, not much has changed
Since I heard that on 360, there has been nothing to suggest it's true.Thats dissapointing if true. He’s done nothing to warrant an immediate walk up. Constable would be ahead of him imo.
While I want everyone available.... Constable has to be a certain starter. Quite frankly, I dont see room for both he and Atkins and Scooter.Since I heard that on 360, there has been nothing to suggest it's true.
I very much doubt he will play.
Get involved Doc.. if youre responding to the couple of posts above then respond directly.No Bews or Tuohy. One of O’Connor or Zuthrie is playing next Friday. That’s hardly controversial to say too
I don’t care which one tbh.Get involved Doc.. if youre responding to the couple of posts above then respond directly.
If you are, then its OConnor for me..... obvious choice for mind
Clark is a near certainty listening to CS on GW podcast.While I want everyone available.... Constable has to be a certain starter. Quite frankly, I dont see room for both he and Atkins and Scooter.
Lets blood them kids.....they are beauties
Not from me... he cops it because of his size. Its that black and white for meI don’t care which one tbh.
Zac cops slack for sharing the same surname as his maligned brother but he has the ability to make it at this level.
Has great positioning and ball reading skills. Just needs some muscle