Scores and rankings Round 1 Scores

[SM]

2,033. Surprised that has me ranked so high.

 

[Fatrollo]

2009.

Some poor decisions like (ultimately) Blicavs over Macaffer and trading out Andrew Swallow 5 minutes before lockout last week for Dangerfield, but just being inside the top 5000 is fine enough for me at the moment.

 

[Barry_Badrinath]

1981. Not great. Ranked about 9k.

 

[TheVelourFog]

2,033. Surprised that has me ranked so high.

This. I ended up with 2099 and I was really unhappy with my team and then noticed I'm in the top 400. Must have been a crazy week for some people

 

[Spider Klein]

2093.


Swan as C, instead of exploiting partial lockout with Gibbs. (-20 points)

Only cost you 10 points




2070 for me.

Admittedly there were some real under performing premiums but surprised the scores aren't higher.

All obvious rookies scored well. (Goodes, Wines, Pittard, Stevenson, Viney)
And our 2 obvious captains Gaz and Swan scored well. Surely Gaz or Swan were captaining 90% of their dream teams out there

 

[CotchForPM]

2108 for me, had Z Smith and played Whitfield over Viney as well, very happy!

 

[BorisDawg]

1,989 for me. Would've liked a bit more out of Bennell, Franklin and Fyfe. Definitely didn't help only having Jacobs as a scoring ruckman with Leuenberger and Majak not playing.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

1,989 for me. Would've liked a bit more out of Bennell, Franklin and Fyfe. Definitely didn't help only having Jacobs as a scoring ruckman with Leuenberger and Majak not playing.

Wow, so a zero and you still smashed that out? Quality effort

 

[btemplar88]

posted a score of 2112 with watts on the ground. extremely happy

 

[Five long bones]

Managed 1,891, so many mediocre numbers, same shower could score 2300 next week, minus the Ton plus scorers I remove

 

[smiddy9]

2015 for me with Mitchell on ground and Armstrong!

 

[OrangeDuck]

2050. I'm actually pretty happy with that. Ranked in the top 2k.

 

[Jozzy]

1,937, just glad not to many people had a good score this round.

 

[West Coast Weasel]

1918... Putting that one down to round 1 jitters by the players

 

[settingthebarLOW]

Fuark... 1999

 

[QS]

1990 here. Zorko spudded it, as did Franklin the knob.

 

[True Blue Saint]

2,127. Has me ranked at 137th overall.

Positives:

* All 5 premo's tonned it up (Gaz as captain, Swan, Pendles, ROK & Murphy) in the midfield. Wines, Viney, O'Meara, Matt Jones & Komme rall did enough.

* 3 premiums in the backline should work out fine -Gibbs, Birchall & Hanley complemented by Goodes, Johannisen and Pittard/Stevenson all did enough.

Negatives.

* Rucks. Jacobs & Stef Martin. Not good enough.

* Kieran Harper. Why did I pick you?

 

[BlueBagged]

retiree question - if i got exactly 2000 do i tick the 1900-2000 box or the 2000-2100 box?

 

[FlowersByIrene]

retiree question - if i got exactly 2000 do i tick the 1900-2000 box or the 2000-2100 box?

Whichever you feel more comfortable with

 

[Jessbek]

retiree question - if i got exactly 2000 do i tick the 1900-2000 box or the 2000-2100 box?

1800-1900

 

[Fletch Pewterschmidt]

First time DT'er = 1849, ranking 42,472

I know that;
- Broughton & Ryder were massive failures
- I had my fair share of average (Heppell, Fyfe, Martin, Cox)
- My wins were with players most others had (JJ Kennedy, Viney, O'meara, Gibbs, Ablett as Capt.)
- I'd like to trade 2 players from each position

Unsure on;
- Whether to trade for rookies who will play or move Broughton > Geary/Hartlett/Harbrow and Ryder > Jacobs/Krezuer.
- What "par" is for a player; I'm looking at it via a cost / points ratio (?)

 

[lmach]

First time DT'er = 1849, ranking 42,472

I know that;
- Broughton & Ryder were massive failures
- I had my fair share of average (Heppell, Fyfe, Martin, Cox)
- My wins were with players most others had (JJ Kennedy, Viney, O'meara, Gibbs, Ablett as Capt.)
- I'd like to trade 2 players from each position

Unsure on;
- Whether to trade for rookies who will play or move Broughton > Geary/Hartlett/Harbrow and Ryder > Jacobs/Krezuer.
- What "par" is for a player; I'm looking at it via a cost / points ratio (?)

I would go Broughton > Hartlett and Ryder > Kreuzer if I were you.

Par is another word for the average score for this round. So par this round was probably around 1900. Or if you're talking about a particular player; it would be their average that they're priced at. So if they're priced at a score of 70 and they scored 80; they scored above par.

 

[BlueBagged]

1800-1900

?

 

[BlueBagged]

Whichever you feel more comfortable with

thought I'd do the right thing and tick the 1900-2000 box, no need for an inflated retired ego

 

[Krujan]

thought I'd do the right thing and tick the 1900-2000 box, no need for an inflated retired ego

Just wondering if it's at all possible for you to go 1 post without using the following words: retire, retiree, retires, retired, retirement?