3 emergencies
4 interchange isn't it?
The AFL changed it to four emergencies probably 18 months ago or so. They’ll be eight on our extended bench.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3 emergencies
4 interchange isn't it?
Duman named as a starting 18, Logue and Cerra also named on extended interchange.Bet that Hughes re signed for 2 years today. And will be dropped. Ross loves doing that. Contract extension? Have a week off
McCarthy would be a good selection as he will try and play his heart out I think.
Adam Ceres will also have a go but I think that the boss will try newbies.
Who could be newer than Ceres? I didn't even know he was on our list.
Highly unlikely. Has been emergency a few times. Hasn’t been great for WAFL either. Been good, but underwhelming tbhBewley to get a run?? Or an emergency.
What is it about Taylor.. such a spud yet we play him into formLewis Taylor back in, he's kicked 7 goals against us in their two wins in 17 & 18 and old man Hodge coming over for the trip. Ballenden's a big mobile forward ruck too - I think we bid on him in the draft even though he was tied to Brisbane.
Pretty sure Neale has been tagged nearly every week but still is very damaging.I like the calls for Banfield to Neale. There is no doubt we are going to put a heavy tag on him - Ross is not friends with Neale in any capacity and Neale has been quite frankly a complete dhead in his comments to the media with backhanders to Fyfe and others.
I really want to see us work Neale over in a ruthless display. That is why Banfield comes back for me. He is a tough character with a bit of mongrel and he can be damaging the other way - even kicking a few goals we need. He needed to go back to the WAFL with some poor games, but hopefully with another chance he does the job.
Also agree with the call to manage either Cerra or Brayshaw. I would really like to see Bewley come in. He completely butchered it in the pre season after a lot of hype, but I do not understand why even keep some players on our list if we are not going to play them. We have been competitive, however we need a genuine competition for spots - it would appear this is not the case for some players. Colyer was a good call, but it needs to go to others.
I stand by my calls for some time, that the forward line is suffering simply because of our inability to hit a target at half forward and in the 50. We should not be trying to take contested marks in the forward 50, we should be able to hit leads. But we just butcher it time and time again. It is horrendous. Last week I remember a kick to Cerra for a 1:1 deep on the boundary.... WHY - please tell me how this could even by a 5th option? Our conversion probably makes this look worse than it is, however that seems to be a trend across most teams this year.
It will be interesting where Logue plays. He could spend some time in the midfield, or on the wing - he seems to have the tank, and our defence is the reason we have been competitive thus far. I could be completely off the planet here, but it is a possibility IMO.
oh no, you fell for the media headlinesI like the calls for Banfield to Neale. There is no doubt we are going to put a heavy tag on him - Ross is not friends with Neale in any capacity and Neale has been quite frankly a complete dhead in his comments to the media with backhanders to Fyfe and others.
I dont mind constructive criticism. Justin Westoff is underrated outside your club. On his best day he can be a damaging player. Would love to have a guy like him at freo. Billy Frampton too as he is a South Freo boy. I do rate Brennan Cox. Hell, despite me living in the Port Adelaide area, I am a south Adelaide fan. Even before he was drafted at Freo, I saw a a few Woodville west torrens games. I saw cox play both ends in 2016, His final year in the SANFL before freo drafted him.Ross needs to watch Ports gameplanning for Westhoff over the last 6 years to try and get Cox into a similar role imo as an outside viewer of Fremantle.
Both laconic at times with good marking and generally clean kicking that can be swung around or back up ruck if needed.
Suprised people are throwing him under the bus at 20 when Ross is known to be a poor offensive coach who surely isn't helping his forward development
Again, I do Admire your constrictive criticism. Now you said Ross Lyon hasn't developed good forwards because of his game plan. The toughest bit about quality forwards, especially KPFs, is that some of them take 3-5 years to develop.I didn't say he had, just that Ross hasn't developed good forwards because of his game plan.
Hinkley has his deficiencies as a coach, but how he uses Westhoff has not been one of those. Just a suggestion of how I think Freo could best use Cox.
I wanted Scott Jones to play vs Brisbane. Let both Lobb and Jones both rotate the ruck and full forward spot.I really think we are missing a trick not playing a proper ruckman with Lobb, rather than just him plus a forward rucking. Which game did we score the most points in and what was the setup there?
The thing is, having two decent rucks should afford us more dominance in the centre as the game goes on, which means we get more scores from stoppages. I know we like to setup to be a team that hurts on the rebound but scores from the centre IMO save effort and conserve energy. Likewise it is easier to defend.
It is a shame that Darcy has got injured again, but I reckon there is an argument on principle to pick Jones as a 60% ruck and make Lobb 40% whilst playing more forward in Taberners absence.
Lewis Taylor back in, he's kicked 7 goals against us in their two wins in 17 & 18 and old man Hodge coming over for the trip. Ballenden's a big mobile forward ruck too - I think we bid on him in the draft even though he was tied to Brisbane.
How are they “like-for-like”? They both play in the forward line? Because physically and positionally they are poles apart.
Great - The Lions won't score if we sit him in the back pocket. Get him inHe’s pretty hard to miss, what with his diameter of 945kms.
That's my take on it too. He was able to lock Fyfe out of it.Ballendeen has been playing in defence, But doubt he comes in.
berry out is a huuuge loss for Lions, he did a defensive role on Fyfe last yr till he got injured (obviuosly)
That's my take on it too. He was able to lock Fyfe out of it.
I just hope we don't lose a structural tall right before the bounce and then our best mid during the game.
Saw Ballendon play a couple of times for the allies in his draft year. Was easily their best player in the game against WA. How is he progressing as thought he would have debuted already in a team going through a rebuildBallendeen has been playing in defence, But doubt he comes in.
berry out is a huuuge loss for Lions, he did a defensive role on Fyfe last yr till he got injured (obviuosly)
I reckon Ross is more peeved at Neale letting a Brisbane staff member board with him during the season last yearI like the calls for Banfield to Neale. There is no doubt we are going to put a heavy tag on him - Ross is not friends with Neale in any capacity and Neale has been quite frankly a complete dhead in his comments to the media with backhanders to Fyfe and others.
I really want to see us work Neale over in a ruthless display. That is why Banfield comes back for me. He is a tough character with a bit of mongrel and he can be damaging the other way - even kicking a few goals we need. He needed to go back to the WAFL with some poor games, but hopefully with another chance he does the job.
Also agree with the call to manage either Cerra or Brayshaw. I would really like to see Bewley come in. He completely butchered it in the pre season after a lot of hype, but I do not understand why even keep some players on our list if we are not going to play them. We have been competitive, however we need a genuine competition for spots - it would appear this is not the case for some players. Colyer was a good call, but it needs to go to others.
I stand by my calls for some time, that the forward line is suffering simply because of our inability to hit a target at half forward and in the 50. We should not be trying to take contested marks in the forward 50, we should be able to hit leads. But we just butcher it time and time again. It is horrendous. Last week I remember a kick to Cerra for a 1:1 deep on the boundary.... WHY - please tell me how this could even by a 5th option? Our conversion probably makes this look worse than it is, however that seems to be a trend across most teams this year.
It will be interesting where Logue plays. He could spend some time in the midfield, or on the wing - he seems to have the tank, and our defence is the reason we have been competitive thus far. I could be completely off the planet here, but it is a possibility IMO.
I don't think Neale has been giving backhanders to Fyfe, maybe to the club for poor culture although he says he was misquoted?I like the calls for Banfield to Neale. There is no doubt we are going to put a heavy tag on him - Ross is not friends with Neale in any capacity and Neale has been quite frankly a complete dhead in his comments to the media with backhanders to Fyfe and others.
I really want to see us work Neale over in a ruthless display. That is why Banfield comes back for me. He is a tough character with a bit of mongrel and he can be damaging the other way - even kicking a few goals we need. He needed to go back to the WAFL with some poor games, but hopefully with another chance he does the job.
Also agree with the call to manage either Cerra or Brayshaw. I would really like to see Bewley come in. He completely butchered it in the pre season after a lot of hype, but I do not understand why even keep some players on our list if we are not going to play them. We have been competitive, however we need a genuine competition for spots - it would appear this is not the case for some players. Colyer was a good call, but it needs to go to others.
I stand by my calls for some time, that the forward line is suffering simply because of our inability to hit a target at half forward and in the 50. We should not be trying to take contested marks in the forward 50, we should be able to hit leads. But we just butcher it time and time again. It is horrendous. Last week I remember a kick to Cerra for a 1:1 deep on the boundary.... WHY - please tell me how this could even by a 5th option? Our conversion probably makes this look worse than it is, however that seems to be a trend across most teams this year.
It will be interesting where Logue plays. He could spend some time in the midfield, or on the wing - he seems to have the tank, and our defence is the reason we have been competitive thus far. I could be completely off the planet here, but it is a possibility IMO.