Sexton 0.1Maybe Long had multiple opponents all night just like all our other defenders did...
Swallow 0.0
Holman 0.0
Long is a marvel on all three apparently, no wonder he didn't get dropped.
What a guy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sexton 0.1Maybe Long had multiple opponents all night just like all our other defenders did...
Please 5 touches and 5 frees against for a half back is ATROCIOUS. If that was Savage people would demand he's out.
The second image looks like Long's meant to be on Ainsworth (#9). He's looking directly at him - he's guarding space then will pick Ainswerth up if the ball comes in the area.Patton appears to be on Rankine:
View attachment 931748
Long doesn't appear to be on anyone:
View attachment 931749
DOwn the ground, no Long on sexton or Rankine:
View attachment 931750
No long again:
View attachment 931751
Next clearance Longs closest opponent is in fact Holman:
View attachment 931752
Sorry but l just don't get any of this conjecture over what Long was or wasn't doing.
The alternative players aren't part of our future, and none of them offer the point of difference that Long brings.
Peeps need to get over it. Good, bad or otherwise he's the best prospect right here right now, and obviously has the faith of the selectors.
Or should they bring Philips back instead?
If he was playing as loose man and was meant to be heavily involved in intercepting, what the fu** was he doing all game!?
I don’t think he should be dropped, the thing with Long right now, I don’t trust him. Hopefully that comes in time. It did with Paton and it’s turning with Coffield. He does hurt people though!
Well, he wasnt intercepting. He didn’t drive any attacks forward or offer any good rebound. He didn’t shut anyone down (I’m sure he did at times). Doesn’t sound like he was doing anything useful.i don't think it's so much itercepting as really attacking the opposition drive forward from the stoppage. then really driving attacks forward.
i think his game should be judged on that. he does spend some time off the ground though in the first half.
if you want to heap praise on someone for their job on sexton it should be Coffield that receives it. Not Long. Likewise Paton is on Rankine.
Long briefly responsible for Ainsworth.
Not sure how that's conclusive. Defensive set ups are positional. You're only man on man when the ball is bounced in the middle and at stoppages in our defensive 50. When we are on the attack , defenders spread to make the ground bigger and the opposite happens when we are defending.Patton appears to be on Rankine:
View attachment 931748
Long doesn't appear to be on anyone:
View attachment 931749
DOwn the ground, no Long on sexton or Rankine:
View attachment 931750
No long again:
View attachment 931751
Next clearance Longs closest opponent is in fact Holman:
View attachment 931752
Im talking less likely to make a mistake.. Long is very capable 1on1if we are talking Goal impact, Paton actually was the worst performed given Rankine was the best performed small forward for the opposition and he had a hard tag on him.
Coffield did well on Sexton, kept him goal-less.
Agree as most times he halves the contest which is what you want from a defenderIm talking less likely to make a mistake.. Long is very capable 1on1
Not sure how that's conclusive. Defensive set ups are positional. You're only man on man when the ball is bounced in the middle and at stoppages in our defensive 50. When we are on the attack , defenders spread to make the ground bigger and the opposite happens when we are defending.