- Mar 20, 2007
- 28,264
- 24,782
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Ive got 16 trades and 2 rooks.
I've also got Billings, Parker, Merrett, Neale, Gray, Taranto so the definition of keepers is pretty loose.
Round 11 trades
- Thread starter Agechamp
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I've also got Billings, Parker, Merrett, Neale, Gray, Taranto so the definition of keepers is pretty loose.
amos
Mozzie Bites FFC CEO
Lloyd, Laird, Simpson, Sicily, Seedsman, Doedee (Mirra/Rice)
Macrae, Mitchell, McLean, Coniglio, Gibbs, Merret, Whitfield, Rockliffe (Coffield/Barry/Phillips)
Gawn, Lycett (Crossley)
Smith, Heeney, Walters, Billings, Christensen, Fritsch (Guelfi/Smith)
It's far from perfect because I have Christensen, Billings, Whitfield and Lycett, though. Lycett is doing his job for now, so might now hold him to the bye. The three forward rookies (two on bench and one on field) are doing enough to cover the F6, and even F5 for now as well, certainly to cover Billings or Christensen when I have an inkling they'll spud it up, but we'll dump one, bring McLean back down and grab dusty or another underperforming mid during byes.
Anyway, either:
1) Murray and Lycett to Rice and Grundy (leaves around 60k in the kitty from memory)
2) Murray and Kelly to Rice and Smith (leaves 600k in the kitty)
3) Kelly and Lycett to Smith and Grundy (leaves about 10k in the kitty)
Last edited:
If you've got enough coverage in defence, I'd go option 3. Kelly is just leaking money, where Murray will hold his value.
Thanks, I was thinking the same. Its just all Brayshaw at the moment with his big score. Was leaning towards Simpson as a more solid premo.
Huttabito
Premiership Player
- Jan 13, 2017
- 3,696
- 9,452
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Players revert back to a mean, and if you've missed the 166 then you are paying for past scores, not the future. He may well be a fine pick, but like you said, Simmo is a premium with a solid scoring history and for me, worth the extra $35k. Call it an insurance fee if you will.
PepeSilvia
Norm Smith Medallist
Am I crazy bringing Ridley in over Rice? I'm really unsure about how long Ridley will stay in the senior team, but he'd be so helpful for my bye structure.
Slipps
Norm Smith Medallist
- May 25, 2012
- 6,961
- 7,077
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Crazy as a coconut !! Go rice for sure
toxic
Premium Gold
Rice is much healthier
PepeSilvia
Norm Smith Medallist
Faaaaaaark, I know Rice is the better option but he really doesn't help me across the byes. I guess Ridley also doesn't help me across the byes if he ends up not playing at all. Really struggling with this one.
Please tell me this pun was intentional.
Was going to go
Cole downgrade
And coffield upgrade
But with the teams have changed that to mirra out. Cant trust that mirra will play throughout the byes
Will have to keep cole through the byes instead
Cole downgrade
And coffield upgrade
But with the teams have changed that to mirra out. Cant trust that mirra will play throughout the byes
Will have to keep cole through the byes instead
Agechamp
Club Legend
- Feb 25, 2018
- 1,777
- 668
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #88
So I've got 2 mids to finish off.
Curnow will be my last get after his bye.
I need to choose 1 for this week.
Currently have danger traded in.
I have macrae, Titch, treloar, fyfe, coniglio, o'meara, danger, Walter's (moved to fwd when I get curnow).
Anyone better over danger?
Curnow will be my last get after his bye.
I need to choose 1 for this week.
Currently have danger traded in.
I have macrae, Titch, treloar, fyfe, coniglio, o'meara, danger, Walter's (moved to fwd when I get curnow).
Anyone better over danger?
Super jealous of your midfield, top 5 mids right there! Curnow and Danger will be the cherry on the top!
- Mar 20, 2007
- 28,264
- 24,782
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Sticking with my initial trades
Finlayson --> Rice, Kelly --> Rockliff
Means Rice at D6 this week, Murray and Mirra EMG (iliketolivedangerously.jpg)
Depending on scores this week, could have enough coin next week to go
Murray --> Heron (hope he plays well, a gold coast rookie would be great through the byes)
Brayshaw --> Simpson (Seedsman into the middle for the time being)
Fritsch --> McLean (Billings becomes F7)
I'm not too fussed about trading in R12 players ahead of their bye. I have 24 to choose from
Finlayson --> Rice, Kelly --> Rockliff
Means Rice at D6 this week, Murray and Mirra EMG (iliketolivedangerously.jpg)
Depending on scores this week, could have enough coin next week to go
Murray --> Heron (hope he plays well, a gold coast rookie would be great through the byes)
Brayshaw --> Simpson (Seedsman into the middle for the time being)
Fritsch --> McLean (Billings becomes F7)
I'm not too fussed about trading in R12 players ahead of their bye. I have 24 to choose from
- Jul 9, 2013
- 10,728
- 12,733
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I don't think so. Ridley has looked really good at the level and look at the players named on the bench and as emergencies for Essendon. Ridley isn't going anywhere. Rice likely has to play as a tall defender and could have quite the impact on his scoring.
Still going with my ZGL->Smith and Kelly->Rocky trades after the Howe out. Just have to hold Howe and hope he is back next week. If he isn't then he may be fodder for a round 12 premo over his bye.
My hardest choices are which rookies to play - Richards v Rice (thinking Richards) and Ronke v Smith v Guelfi (still unsure on this. Smith is safer, but if Ronke outscores him handily it could be a good POD, Guelfi has tougher opposition so probably doesn't get a look in).
My hardest choices are which rookies to play - Richards v Rice (thinking Richards) and Ronke v Smith v Guelfi (still unsure on this. Smith is safer, but if Ronke outscores him handily it could be a good POD, Guelfi has tougher opposition so probably doesn't get a look in).
Huttabito
Premiership Player
- Jan 13, 2017
- 3,696
- 9,452
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Torn on the second trade. ZGL -> Smith locked.
Was planning on going Richards -> Rice, however the 87 last week and new BE of 13 has thrown a spanner in the works. Had he scored another 60, he was in the gun and gone for sure. Thinking I should stick with the upgrade plan and be thankful for the extra $37k he gave.
Was planning on going Richards -> Rice, however the 87 last week and new BE of 13 has thrown a spanner in the works. Had he scored another 60, he was in the gun and gone for sure. Thinking I should stick with the upgrade plan and be thankful for the extra $37k he gave.
Feels like I'm the only one trading out Frisch. You guys think he's a keeper (M6/M7) or still more money to be made ?
I’m keeping him until his bye. Has been scoring well recently so you wouldn’t think he’s going to crash.
Thinking his cash generation is about 25-50k more (max). Guelfi and Spargo aren't ready to be moved on. I still have ZGL.
Do we think he's Plateued? He only needs one or two good scores to start producing more $$.
Slipps
Norm Smith Medallist
- May 25, 2012
- 6,961
- 7,077
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Scoring potential atm is fine keep him til his bye he may bust out another big score which is handy
I'm in the exact same spot as you. Locked ZGL > Smith and was gonna do the Richards > Rice. I'm now thinking of Cole > Rice instead. I still have Murray and Coffield on the pine but would rather trade them both out in their bye round in case they come back in next week..
debra17
Rookie
I’m trading him out as well for smith. The profit from doing so allows me to go Barry> rockliff which helps my bye structure immensely.
I will be fielding guelfi/smith who I think are capable of producing similar scores so won’t lose too much in terms of onfield scoring (I hope!). Smith has the same by so it also means my bye structure remains the same. Happy to keep ZGL around as a warm body through the bye and hope he doesn’t get dropped, who knows he might score a 50 just when I need it though the byes lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Option 1
Seedsman -> Mid
Brayshaw (Freo) -> K.Simpson
Fritsch (Mel) -> Walters
Then during the bye go hard on the trades and move Seedsman back and finish off the midfield
Not sure if it's a smart idea turfing fritsch just yet, reversing about a bajillion times
Option 2
Fritsch (Mel) -> Walters (Freo)
Brayshaw (Freo) -> A.Brayshaw (Mel)
Straight trading
Seedsman -> Mid
Brayshaw (Freo) -> K.Simpson
Fritsch (Mel) -> Walters
Then during the bye go hard on the trades and move Seedsman back and finish off the midfield
Not sure if it's a smart idea turfing fritsch just yet, reversing about a bajillion times
Option 2
Fritsch (Mel) -> Walters (Freo)
Brayshaw (Freo) -> A.Brayshaw (Mel)
Straight trading
