Round 12 discussion

[mrpig]

Griffen pendles and swan great qtr

Dwyer and macaffer. Step on the gas.

Macaffer not tagging Griffen reall helps both players

 

[Jcpdragonx]

Had a shocking round and will end up with 1900. Will probably see people hit 2100+

 

[Rise_up_Stiffy]

Kyle Martin well done champ, 1962 here. Should have 20 for round 13 as well

 

[Ball Hog]

1983 all finished.

Solid score to back up 1970 last week. 393 points from Swan, Pendles & Cloke from that game was handy

EDIT: 1987, Pendles got an extra 4 after the game

 

[Crawb]

1899! One short of 1900!! Oh well it's not a terrible score, a little below par though?

 

[lion4life]

2022 here

 

[Anzac16]

1832 all up.... Will drop heavily in rankings.

Only consoling factor for me is that there will be a lot of people who will get screwed over next week with the bye whilst I should still be able to field a pretty decent team.

 

[CrozaN]

1866...not bad but am already dreading next week!!

 

[Teal]

Finished on 1889, next week should be fun

 

[Jessbek]

1990. Hmm.

 

[Premiumtrim]

This week I have 21 players playing, opponent has 20 playing. Means I lose 3 players scores due to 'best 18' and he only loses 2 scores. So it's a disadvantage to have more playing? Can someone shed some light on this?

 

[Taylor]

2035, good result from a firing midfield.

 

[OrdinaryJoel]

1751

 

[Butler]

1977.

Only one more week of byes Too bad I have just 17 players before trades for next week and that is including Pittard

 

[Taylor]

This week I have 21 players playing, opponent has 20 playing. Means I lose 3 players scores due to 'best 18' and he only loses 2 scores. So it's a disadvantage to have more playing? Can someone shed some light on this?

It's a disadvantage on the other weeks for you. If you both have the same bottom four players and two of your unique players get over the top of them, you'll be laughing.

 

[Blue and Gold Blood]

1842. Thought it was a good score till i checked this thread. Birchall and Hanley killing my score yet again. Cant wait to upgrade them to Gibbs and Heppell.

 

[Scrotes2000]

1845. Murphy's 24 really hurt.

 

[Fitzey]

Will my ranking drop with 1852 at 9950?

 

[Forward Press]

1916, satisfied with that considering I had Zorko and Lewis amongst other underperforming premiums.

This week I have 21 players playing, opponent has 20 playing. Means I lose 3 players scores due to 'best 18' and he only loses 2 scores. So it's a disadvantage to have more playing? Can someone shed some light on this?

It's an advantage to you - your team has more scores to draw from for a best 18.

 

[Clint Beastwood]

1829. Was pleased with that after having to field Staker and Neade, and Lewis, Hanley and Murphy (more so Hodge) screwing me over.

 

[CACA_TAZZA]

1818, another horrible bye score, I hate the byes!!

Edited: 1822, Pendles got some locker room touches

 

[lmach]

1724 FFS. 18 players and still couldn't get a decent score.

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

Waitin on the site to adjust and drop the low scoring players to save me. Unless its already been done??

 

[Ball Hog]

Waitin on the site to adjust and drop the low scoring players to save me. Unless its already been done??

It should have already been done. My 3 lowest scores were dropped in the last game as soon as Pendles, Swan & Cloke beat them.

 

[Plugger35]

1908

Came home like a steam train with captain Swan, Goodes and Stringer.

Very happy with Stringer's 96 pts, made up for some shit scores.