He's gotta play on someone though.No, just part of a 6 man defensive unit rather than having a specific role to beat one player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
He's gotta play on someone though.No, just part of a 6 man defensive unit rather than having a specific role to beat one player.
That’s not how defences operate now. They are accountable for whoever they are on at a particular moment, but the game has changed from when defenders had their man and they stick with them for four quarters. It doesn’t mean they defend any less - of course they are still accountable to whoever is their responsibility at any given moment - but it’s not a case of get one forward and battle with him for the match, generally.Disagree. Defenders are still accountable for a player & have defined roles, even the extra.
And he will but it will be different players throughout the game.He's gotta play on someone though.
No, just part of a 6 man defensive unit rather than having a specific role to beat one player.
McCarthy probably the most likely out of those.Who would you play him on? I don’t like him against Cameron, Zorko, McCarthy or Mcluggage.
Also have Long on the bench.
He will be accountable for different players throughout the game, not just one specific player.This doesn’t make sense. The only time they aren’t accountable is when the defence is pressing up & holding a zone. When the call bounces in the middle, or there’s a defensive stoppage, or the oppo is controlling field position, the defenders will be accountable for a player/s.
McCarthy probably the most likely out of those.
They'll rotate their forwards and we'll rotate our backs though so no doubt we see him with a few different match ups.
He looks a bit beaten up at the moment but hopefully he can play a role
Most of the time our backs seem to spend large portions of games on one opponent. I've got no doubt we'd have preferred match ups for each player going into the game.And he will but it will be different players throughout the game.
We play a zone defense so he won't have the same opponent the entire time.
We haven't really gone with the 7 man back line a lot though have we?Personally I would have it like this
Paton - Cameron
Wilkie - McCarthy
Long - Zorko
Howard - Hipwood
Carlisle - McStay
Geary - resting mid
Coffield - loose
Edit: forgot Rayner is back. Wilkie will need to play on him
He will be accountable for different players throughout the game, not just one specific player.
He will likely have some time on Cameron, some time on McCarthy, then Rayner etc.
All part of the zone defence we play.
We haven't really gone with the 7 man back line a lot though have we?
Only reason Coff ended up loose last week was because that's what the Bombers did I think.
Don't mind those match ups though.
Not really. Occasionally they do, like Paton spending the majority of time on Papley or Howard will play on the deepest forward etc.. But typically, our backs dont have direct one-on-one match ups throughout the entire game.Most of the time our backs seem to spend large portions of games on one opponent. I've got no doubt we'd have preferred match ups for each player going into the game.
Paton spent almost the whole game on Betts and Papley for instance.
Each players have their strengths and weaknesses.
Yes provocativeNewsflash..
Discuss. .Yes provocative
Geary would have to goto the one legged Cameron now id imagine
I think that has a lot to do with the way opposition rotates players on and off the bench though. It makes it impossible to stay on one player for a whole game.Not really. Occasionally they do, like Paton spending the majority of time on Papley or Howard will play on the deepest forward etc.. But typically, our backs dont have one-on-one match ups throughout the game.
Great example of this if Long in the Gold Coast game. He was constantly rotating on the small/mid sized forwards of Gold Coast. This is what the backline does for most games.
Rayner is a pretty low possession player, he’ll be lucky to get a touch if Wilkie plays on him.Personally I would have it like this
Paton - Cameron
Wilkie - McCarthy
Long - Zorko
Howard - Hipwood
Carlisle - McStay
Geary - resting mid
Coffield - loose
Edit: forgot Rayner is back. Wilkie will need to play on him
We need to nullify Neale and Zorko and we will win.Feel for my man lone-dog, best pressure player for us last week and no better small forwards IMO.
Kent deserves to play if fit though.
Solid side on paper, but need Ross, Steele & Jones at their very best to win this.
We can do that.We need to nullify Neale and Zorko and we will win.
Thanks for the kind words. Was fun to write as I've always had a soft spot for the saints. Must be the Lenny Hayes effect.If you haven’t already done so, I recommend you go and visit the Lions board and read the post for the preview of this game on the corresponding thread.
It’s well written and a really good read, with very good analysis of our game and team.