Captains Round 13 VC / Captain

[balmainforever]

Oliver vc
Sturt c (maybe Neal)

 

[stevebbb]

**** IT
Rivers to the bench, C on somebody else
SURELY I can't be that unlucky and cop an early injury for 20 points
80-120 will be shit, but not the worst thing

 

[Gene Simmons]

Why’s do you guys think?

Fyfe v Lloyd for Captain..

 

[Bollox]

Going Danger into Neale

 

[BOMBERBLITZ]

Why’s do you guys think?

Fyfe v Lloyd for Captain..

Fyfe is Lyfe

 

[Axly]

Why’s do you guys think?

Fyfe v Lloyd for Captain..

....is Lyfe

 

[Axly]

Going Danger into Neale

[emoji106]
Danger loves Adelaide. Should kick a few too[emoji108]

 

[SC fish]

I'm taking Bonts 135

 

[toxic]

taking Cripps

it'll do

 

[hawkermitch]

Ratts mentions tagging Lachie Neale, do I look someone else or go with the gut and stick to Neale?

 

[SC fish]

Ratts mentions tagging Lachie Neale, do I look someone else or go with the gut and stick to Neale?

VC or C?

 

[hawkermitch]

VC or C?

It is for the C - my VC was Cripps

 

[SC fish]

It is for the C - my VC was Cripps

I'd probably take the Cripps 123 over Neale, unless you have someone else with a high ceiling.

 

[hawkermitch]

I'd probably take the Cripps 123 over Neale, unless you have someone else with a high ceiling.

Not really, according to super coach score projections.

I could do a NicNat or Grundy as my other main mids have played.

Was thinking of Mitch but thought he may have been tired. Oh well...

 

[Walshy_The_Goat]

Lost track of the fact the Sydney game was on tonight, as I was going to loop Gould to get Macrae's VC score.

FUUUUUUUU!

Now I am forced to go with Neale. Otherwise my only other non-playing player is Skinner, but with the E already on Cavarra. So I would be forced to take his score if I was to bench Close if he scores more than him.

Thoughts?

 

[Herne Hill Hammer]

Hawkins into NicNat

 

[stevebbb]

Tempted by Duncan. There's going to be some big scores for the Cats. The Crows have been giving up monster scores all year

 

[hawkermitch]

I still have an opportunity to put the big C back on Neale.

I'm also thinking NicNat could go huge.

I had Cripps as VC, passed on other mids and forgot I had Dusty in my forwards who played well enough to be a C.

I had to decide on my last mid; took Dev as my E in the midfield.
Then I have a non player, Simpson, with a C on field in case I choose Cripps as the tag
issue arose with an interview with Ratts.

Now I'm thinking the mids go head to head based on the Lions and Saints boards comments.

I'd love a score as 2600 or approx and it needs a higher C option to do this.

I noticed in the discussion part many will captain Neale.

Have time on my side as I await any input on what others may feel or if they know a tag will happen...

 

[jdeezy]

I'm half convinced Dangerfield and Geelong as a unit coast through today's game, but Christ, even if they coast they should win by 10 goals, so I'm going Danger as Captain.

 

[Bollox]

Lost track of the fact the Sydney game was on tonight, as I was going to loop Gould to get Macrae's VC score.

FUUUUUUUU!

Now I am forced to go with Neale. Otherwise my only other non-playing player is Skinner, but with the E already on Cavarra. So I would be forced to take his score if I was to bench Close if he scores more than him.

Thoughts?

First world problem.
The loop is a bit tuff this week....do you really need it though ?
If you crunch the issue at hand it is simply trusting a bloke to score 130+....a bloke that has averaged 146 and has a 3 rnd avge of 150.

Is it really much of an issue ?
Downside risk of maybe 30pts ?? Potential upside of 30 points also.

If it was a 160+ VC i'd understand the angst a little.

Relax about it.

 

[RoughysMullet]

Neale or Grundy for C ??
Worried about the Steele tag with Neale but Grundy up against Goldy

 

[stevebbb]

Couple of junk goals to jump from 110 to 130

 

[Walshy_The_Goat]

First world problem.
The loop is a bit tuff this week....do you really need it though ?
If you crunch the issue at hand it is simply trusting a bloke to score 130+....a bloke that has averaged 146 and has a 3 rnd avge of 150.

Is it really much of an issue ?
Downside risk of maybe 30pts ?? Potential upside of 30 points also.

If it was a 160+ VC i'd understand the angst a little.

Relax about it.

The tag is why I was worried, and turned out it was a 70+ point turnaround.