- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
- Posts
- 17,116
- Reaction score
- 56,439
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Danger fully fit now?
95%
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

StK v HAW · CAR v GEE · SYD v RIC · BL v FRE · WB v COL · MEL v GWS · WCE v ESS ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Danger fully fit now?
I wouldn't think so, but close enough. Duncan's out of the equation for a while now as well I believe. I'll be happy to sideways Daniher to him next week, pending $$$Danger fully fit now?
What his likely Breakeven? I need to wait 1 more week ideally.
What his likely Breakeven? I need to wait 1 more week ideally.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Perfect.

Flynn is the plan assuming Grundy is up and about.Ideally he scores 146+ makes his b/e and y'all need to use 2 trades to get him in.![]()
Ended up doing:
May, Short, Murphy and Heeney
for
Neale, Hall, Haynes and Newcombe
Next week Flynn and Waterman for Danger and 102.4k r/f. Then team is done, 4 trades left.
No. Terrible idea. Play the long game (unless you’re 12th or lower on the ladder).Considering going Short > Langford because I'm agonisingly close to winning this week and I won't without the trade. Would have 7 trades left. Is it actually a good idea?
Im 12th lol.No. Terrible idea. Play the long game (unless you’re 12th or lower on the ladder).
Well if you need to make finals that’s a call you need to make. Depends on draw and if you think you can make finals without winning this week.Im 12th lol.
when theres about 4 rookie options and only 2 trades. it does.I doubt making a trade gets you a trade