WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #26
That was the "old" Danger ...........hasn't looked like a (VC) option this yearI’m going Danger vc also. Great record vs Adelaide. Last 3: 142 149 132
Danger v Mitchell, on the rebound ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was the "old" Danger ...........hasn't looked like a (VC) option this yearI’m going Danger vc also. Great record vs Adelaide. Last 3: 142 149 132
That was the "old" Danger ...........hasn't looked like a (VC) option this year
Danger v Mitchell, on the rebound ?
This is true.But I bet he wasn't spending most of his time in the forward line during those three games.
I’ve flamed our numerous times on Danger vc like Andrew above, but he still possesses that X factor which is what I want in my vc. Still think it’s worth the punt. Gawn is a safe option to fall back on.That was the "old" Danger ...........hasn't looked like a (VC) option this year
Danger v Mitchell, on the rebound ?
Gawn VC
Neale C
So much can happen in a game it's not worth risking the VC until it's at least the 3rd quarter IMO.
I get into Sydney about 2pm. However, I plan to have a drink or ten when I get thereWhen's the flight?
Same as last week. Titch could be 30 within first 10-15 minutes, in which case lock him in. And if he's single digits at quarter time, then he probably isn't worth sticking with
Really wish i had JPK this week... he slaughters us! I predict min 130
Won’t Jacobs run with him?
Won’t Jacobs run with him?
I'm looking for opinions. Opinions backed up by analysis - even better!
The guy in 2nd place doesn't have Grundy. So he is sure to go VC Titch / C Gawn
So the question is - Do I go defensive and do the same, or attacking and do VC Gawn / C Grundy?
They not going to trade in Grundy?
Titch has the biggest ceiling of the three, would you consider VC Titch / C Grundy?
I'm looking for opinions. Opinions backed up by analysis - even better!
The guy in 2nd place doesn't have Grundy. So he is sure to go VC Titch / C Gawn
So the question is - Do I go defensive and do the same, or attacking and do VC Gawn / C Grundy?
Titch will be tagged by Berry 100%. He kept Cripps to 21 touches last week. I know tags don't always work, but for me it would be the two rucks if you have loop options. I'm going VC Gawn C Grundy if required. Gawn should go nuts against the ruckless dogs. Mcevoy scored 135 against them and he missed half of the last quarter.They not going to trade in Grundy?
Titch has the biggest ceiling of the three, would you consider VC Titch / C Grundy?
I thought we debunked that myth last week?
Did we!? Must have missed it.
Gawn has gone over 160 twice in his career (I think)
Mitch done it twice this year, and once each of the past 2-3 years.
Jacobs ran with him in Rd7 and JPK scored a season high 151
160+
Gawn: 160, 160, 167, 168, 168, 172, 174
Titch: 161, 167, 178, 181
I seem to recall him following Parker.....