Captains Round 18 VC / Captain

[Hird the news]

Hey Lads,

I've asked this question before but want to be sure...

Got VC on Danger, if I put Hibberd (Nth) on starting mid as Captain and Merret on bench as Sub will I get Danger C score?



On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Jiska]

Hey Lads,

I've asked this question before but want to be sure...

Got VC on Danger, if I put Hibberd (Nth) on starting mid as Captain and Merret on bench as Sub will I get Danger C score?



On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Try the read before posting thread

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...fo-read-before-posting.1094680/#post-38219801

 

[Hird the news]

Try the read before posting thread

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...fo-read-before-posting.1094680/#post-38219801

I've read and understand however it states make sure your Non playing player is playing before your captain.

In my case having hibberd and merret in same would be ok right?

A yes no would be much appreciated


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[DaveyBoy123]

I've read and understand however it states make sure your Non playing player is playing before your captain.

In my case having hibberd and merret in same would be ok right?

A yes no would be much appreciated

You're all good mate... You will get Danger's score doubled doing that.

But if I can make a suggestion: Bench & E someone who is worse than Zerrett. He can't be the worst of your remaining MIDs. Not that it really matters, but still.

Totally separate from the question you asked: Also, keep an eye for any late OUTs from your other starting MIDs. If you have any other playing bench-warmers, you will have to try & E them as well. But don't do that unless there is a late out.

 

[toxic]

Hey Lads,

I've asked this question before but want to be sure...

Got VC on Danger, if I put Hibberd (Nth) on starting mid as Captain and Merret on bench as Sub will I get Danger C score?



On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Yes bud, spot on.

And feel free to keep asking questions and contributing!

 

[MightyRoar]

Prob Selwood > Mitchell, but not sure yet. There are a few that could go well this week.

I went with Selwood as VC over Danger for something different and he scored 127 which is good still but just wandering whether I roll the dice and chuck the C on Bont, just got this feeling that he might go big this round.......what score do people accept for their VC.

 

[stevebbb]

All hail his Godliness





9 round average of 154.8

 

[pincrusher]

I went with Selwood as VC over Danger for something different and he scored 127 which is good still but just wandering whether I roll the dice and chuck the C on Bont, just got this feeling that he might go big this round.......what score do people accept for their VC.

Mad not to take it. Anything over 120 should be an absolute lock.

 

[MightyRoar]

Mad not to take it. Anything over 120 should be an absolute lock.

True mate, I do actually stick with a score of around 120 for Vc's funnily enough.....pending who other players are playing against but i just reckon the Bont is gunna go big this week

 

[Knighta21]

My opponent doesn't even have Danger
Was going to go VC Merret and Bont C but thought if you can VC Danger, you do it!

 

[Faz 2000]

 

[pincrusher]

True mate, I do actually stick with a score of around 120 for Vc's funnily enough.....pending who other players are playing against but i just reckon the Bont is gunna go big this week

And he might ping a hammy in the first minute too.

 

[SC fish]

My opponent doesn't even have Danger
Was going to go VC Merret and Bont C but thought if you can VC Danger, you do it!

My main league opponent had VC Danger but kept the C on Merrett. 44 points lost.

 

[gutsroy]

My main league opponent had VC Danger but kept the C on Merrett. 44 points lost.

Hard to feel too much sympathy for somebody who doesn't lock away a 140 (unless they needed an absolute Hail Mary).

 

[DaveyBoy123]

My main league opponent had VC Danger but kept the C on Merrett. 44 points lost.

I had the same V & C, but obviously took Danger. Tbh though, if Danger had scored in the 110-120 range, I would have left the C on Zerrett. Thought he'd definitely cruise to 120 against the kangas, so quite disappointed with his 98.

 

[Boris the Contradiction]

I think at this stage Danger and Doc are going to be the best options every week.

Danger has scored 141+ nine rounds in a row. Incredible.