Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
There are a few guys that do this - Taylor is good at targeting his spoils at well, Ben Brown is very good at "not taking a mark" but basically palming the ball to his feet for a Melbourne player to run on to. It's really underrated, but it really only works for those gifted with abnormal size/reach.It was interesting to listen to Jed Adcock in a recent interview talk about not just defending to stop the other team from scoring, but also focusing on positioning to help win the ball back.
The amount of times our guys have been able to rebound directly off Andrews' spoils in recent weeks has been a feature, and given its regularity I find it hard to put it down to random chance.
I think this has been a huge benefit of swapping Davis and Adcock... We're seeing both our forwards defend better and our backs attack better.
I know Melbourne specifically train Brown and I think Pickett on palming it down for the front and centre. Controlling how the ball ends up going to ground is definitely a poorly understood and underrated skillThere are a few guys that do this - Taylor is good at targeting his spoils at well, Ben Brown is very good at "not taking a mark" but basically palming the ball to his feet for a Melbourne player to run on to. It's really underrated, but it really only works for those gifted with abnormal size/reach.
I know Melbourne specifically train Brown and I think Pickett on palming it down for the front and centre. Controlling how the ball ends up going to ground is definitely a poorly understood and underrated skill
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don't have concerns about our fitness, it looks like a bit of composure/drop in concentration that means we aren't finishing games off as well as we could. Late game accuracy is a theme I've found looking back over our games a bit closer. This season, we've had more games (compared to Port and Collingwood) where statistically we are very unlikely to lose a game based on the score at 3 quarter time or early in the 4th. Anything less than 5 goals isn't enough as we've found out recently.Agree with all of this. The way we are playing right now is absolutely premiership football. The way we cut off basically every attempt Geelong made to come back into the corridor was quite spectacular, on par with our ball movement against Melbourne the week prior.
I fear however it will all count for nothing given the growing issues with our last quarters. Yes, we all want to be able to sweep it under the carpet with cliches like "they're a good team, they were always going to come at us" or "we knew the game was over and we just put the cue in the rack".
But the fact is that our last quarters have been an issue all season, even last season as well, and unfortunately there appears to be a pretty strong correlation between teams who finish games strongly and teams who finish seasons strongly.
It'll be intolerable having to watch arguably the most talented playing group in the competition, combined with the best game plan in the comp, get brought undone by a lack of fitness. But I have an awful feeling that is what we're going to see.
This is my only concern I have now with the way we're playing. We literally tick every other box. No, it's not perfect all the time, but in a high intensity game played by human beings we can't ask for much more. It's infuriating that we're absolutely nailing all this really quite complicated stuff like game plans and real emotional buy-in from the whole playing group, yet the most straightforward ability to run out games doesn't seem to be there any more.
Maybe things like physical fitness and scenario training are things we sacrificed during preseason when we went to town on our defensive structure? Only so many hours in a day I suppose.
I'm not sure that Footy is more physical than it was previously. For me the most physical footy was, outside of behind play hits etc was the 90s to mid 2000s. The speed though is so much quicker, and requires so much more high speed running, resulting in far more fatigue from what I see. Fatigue can often be a big contributer to injuries. A fresh Ashcroft maybe reacts differently to the situation or his body moves slightly differently and better, or his other legs aren't fatigued, so the same movement has more support from the surrounding muscles rather than all the pressure being put on the joint.To be fair, I think that's 3 ACL's across the AFL just this week. Lachie Weller redoing his as well as Nick Murray at Adelaide.
They seem to be becoming more and more common. I wonder if this is simply due to the increasing speed and physical nature of the game? It seems so odd that so many of these injuries are happening as a result of seemingly innocuous acts, just like Rayner and Hipwood's were.
| Game Result | Margin | Opponent | Home/Away | Q4 Result | Margin |
| Loss | 54 | Power | Away | Loss | 22 |
| Win | 11 | Demons | Home | Loss | 27 |
| Loss | 14 | Dogs | Away | Loss | 6 |
| Win | 33 | Pies | Home | Win | 3 |
| Win | 75 | North | Away | Win | 21 |
| Win | 21 | Giants | Away | Loss | 1 |
| Win | 48 | Dockers | Home | Win | 14 |
| Win | 26 | Blues | Away | Loss | 14 |
| Win | 42 | Bombers | Home | Win | 25 |
| Win | 43 | Suns | Home | Win | 32 |
| Loss | 17 | Crows | Away | Loss | 2 |
| Loss | 25 | Hawks | Away | Loss | 15 |
| Win | 16 | Swans | Home | Loss | 3 |
| Win | 28 | Saints | Away | Win | 1 |
| Win | 81 | Tigers | Home | Win | 9 |
| Win | 81 | Eagles | Home | Win | 10 |
| Loss | 1 | Demons | Away | Loss | 22 |
| Win | 11 | Cats | Home | Loss | 14 |
| 9 Home 9 Away | 8 Wins 10 Losses |
