No carnage
No trades
No trades
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
iam worried that with Brouch out & the extra media attention, Greenwood may draw extra attention ......been allowed to fly a little under the radar so far IMOWith Greene / Wingard out and having to swing Ryder forward into F5, meant I had to bring Darcy in to R2 and Greenwood into F6.
Was thinking about a fwd trade to avoid one of those.
But with Mumford out, surely Darcy will go large and with Crouch out, Greenwood gets good mid time?
Have you thought about Ryder (22% teams) v Yeo (42%)?Should I bring in Yeo for Greene or go a POD?
It's only Friday? ......don't shoot your load too earlyNo carnage
No trades
Have you thought about Ryder (22% teams) v Yeo (42%)?
There's really no other option that you could depend on, other than YeoGot him in my rucks (sorry should have posted whole team).
Definitely Jelwood ......they have a few SS games where he excels, is upset about the jibe made by Danger about his suntan ........but importantly he's more durable and Jelwood gets going when the business end of the season arrivesI have 3 trades left. Entering finals. Will win the first final guaranteed (6 v 7)
Should I trade pendles for jelwood(did this last week but I foolishly reversed), or for D beams?
Really want motchin/Dangerwood in the team, but maybe could make another upgrade on the back of pocketing the $$$ for beams in finals.
Unsure... I have a s**t forward bench and only have Brennan Cox playing there. I'm leaning toward jelwood primarily because a good finals upgrade could only be made on my other lines (which are stocked...), and can have two direct trades for fwd emergencies.
Definitely Jelwood ......they have a few SS games where he excels, is upset about the jibe made by Danger about his suntan ........but importantly he's more durable and Jelwood gets going when the business end of the season arrives
Just take a look at his head.
Have you considered DeGoey? Especially now Pendles is confirmed out for longer.Got him in my rucks (sorry should have posted whole team).
I'm thinking that Greenwood's strength is his contested ball (65% of his possessions to date have been contested) and tackle count (58 in 8 games), all on about 65% TOG.iam worried that with Brouch out & the extra media attention, Greenwood may draw extra attention ......been allowed to fly a little under the radar so far IMO
iam worried that with Brouch out & the extra media attention, Greenwood may draw extra attention ......been allowed to fly a little under the radar so far IMO
may thanks .....i've just set a screenshot of your post strategy to our coach ......Greenwood says thanksNope.
Pies will tag
Sloane
Laird
MCrouch
Greenwood will hardly be considered imo
Soooooo risky.Newman>Rocky
Nroo> Beams